Hello mairhtin,
Thursday, December 18, 2003, 12:09:40 PM, you wrote:
m> I am getting a new flood of spam that appears not to be even
m> selling anything, but merely trying to get through the filters.
m> Could they be trying to "learn" from this? I don't see how, but
m> someone suggested as muc
There was a lengthy thread on this topic recently,
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10711571901&r=1&w=3
but it didn't look like it concluded with a definitive
rule definition.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Bec
Tim B wrote:
Bill Larson wrote:
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/36402
http://www.enterpriseitplanet.com/security/news/article.php/3288771
http://www.secunia.com/advisories/10395/
Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 833786:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=833786
In this exploit using:
http://[E
Bill Larson wrote:
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/36402
http://www.enterpriseitplanet.com/security/news/article.php/3288771
http://www.secunia.com/advisories/10395/
Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 833786:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=833786
In this exploit using:
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:01:22PM -0500, Tim B wrote:
I don't think I've seen this covered ever. can required_hits = 5.5?
yes. the documentation (and code) specifies 5.0 as the default.
integers are used just for simplicity, but floats are allowed.
Ok great...
I though
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/36402
http://www.enterpriseitplanet.com/security/news/article.php/3288771
http://www.secunia.com/advisories/10395/
Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 833786:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=833786
In this exploit using:
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/malicious.html
h
Hello,
I've been using auto whitelist for a while now, but today while doing some
experimentation I'm wondering if the explicit (auto) white listing feature
is working at all (version 2.61)? I'm also unsure of the exact syntax for
explicitly (auto) white listing an address.
I begin by trying to
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:01:22PM -0500, Tim B wrote:
> I don't think I've seen this covered ever. can required_hits = 5.5?
yes. the documentation (and code) specifies 5.0 as the default.
integers are used just for simplicity, but floats are allowed.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"The most u
I don't think I've seen this covered ever. can required_hits = 5.5?
everywhere points to a whole number, like 5, or 6 ect ect.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.
Great!
How is this done. Where and how do I tell SA to not scan messages that have
the string *SPAM* in the subject line.
I am guessing that it goes in procmailrc, but what is the command / syntax
that does this?
Bill
--On Thursday, December 18, 2003 5:38 PM -0800 "XLNC Studios (Bill Pogue)"
<[E
yes indeed it seems to be working -
but if i look through all the rejected spam i never see any instance of
BAYES amongst the tests used ... so is it actually being used ?
Alexei.
"Christopher M. Iarocci"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18/12/2003 22:25
To
Alexei Moulton
Alan Munday wrote:
> I get failed dependency errors for Mail::Internet and
> Digest::Nilsimsa when I try and rpmbuild from the src.rpm
>
> However when I use CPAN its telling me they are up to date.
Because rpm doesn't know about anything you've installed via CPAN,
tarball, or any other package m
--On Thursday, December 18, 2003 5:38 PM -0800 "XLNC Studios (Bill Pogue)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running SA version 2.6 with sendmail, on a debian Linux system. All
> is working well except I would like all messages labeled as Spam to be
> sent to my email address. Sounds funny I kno
Nope, no control characters.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:27 PM
To: 'Marc Steuer'
Cc: 'Spamassassin-List'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] importing spam from exchange users for sa-learn?
Hi Marc,
Do you see control characters
Hi,
I am running SA version 2.6 with sendmail, on a debian Linux system. All is
working well except I would like all messages labeled as Spam to be sent to
my email address. Sounds funny I know, like I don't have enough Spam as it
is. Right now I have all Spam sent to a folder on the server so I c
Hi Marc,
Do you see control characters when you open the message with a text editor?
I am wondering if Outlook is converting the text message to a .msg format
during the copy.
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Steuer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--snip--
> Let me put in my $.02
Theo has all the SRPMS for the required Perl modules and so do I. You
should try rebuilding the perl-Digest-SAH1 RPM, installing it, and then
rebuild the Razor RPM. I just found that if I stick with RPM, I am much
better off.
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Munday [mailto:[E
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony W. Bunce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 2:08 PM
> To: Spamassassin-List
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] importing spam from exchange users for sa-learn?
>
>
> I tried option 1 and it also modifies the headers the say way
> as if y
Right now I've got qmail putting all incoming mail thru a perlscript
whereby I then use Mail::Audit to filter the mail based on certain
criteria and then programtically invoke Spam::Assassin to determine
what is spam. I also maintain my own whitelist using this filter. I
want to be able to send
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 16:27, Robert Nicholson wrote:
> So I was thinking about how one could maintain Bayes from an MUA for
> certain messages.
>
> Specifically whenever you see false positives in your spam that perhaps
> were learnt by bayes
> you could have something described below.
>
> Assu
I am sure this was rehashed befor but I can't find anything about it.
We are running SA 2.6. Any reason why I couldn't download the latest .cf files
from the SA web site and replace all the files there, which are dated 10/8/03 ?
Shalom Ya'll
Amnon Nissan
Deltaforce
919-852-2121
http://www.delta
Larry
Closer... But that gets me back to a Digest::SHA1 error which I've been
running around with for a while now.
Thanks
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 December 2003 22:29
To: 'Alan Munday'
Cc: 'Spamassassin-List'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] So
Hello Rich,
Friday, December 19, 2003, 12:37:34 AM, you wrote:
Greetings,
We'd like to provide a mirror of spamassassin.org or/and
distribution of this software for Russian Federation. If there's
someone responsible for such a decision -- drop me an email,
please. If not, but someo
So I was thinking about how one could maintain Bayes from an MUA for
certain messages.
Specifically whenever you see false positives in your spam that perhaps
were learnt by bayes
you could have something described below.
Assuming you can fetch mail with courier IMAP thru it's message-id and
n
Sounds like you are trying to mix RPM and CPAN installations. If you are
using a .src.rpm with a .spec file that includes lines like:
BuildRequires: perl(URI), perl(Time::HiRes)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Copy), perl(File::Copy)
BuildRequires: perl(Digest::Nilsimsa), perl(Digest::SHA1)
BuildRequir
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/001161.html
December 18, 2003
Spam: Behind the scenes
Ever wonder about the mindset of the people who clog your inbox with
unsolicited e-mail? The lawsuits filed today by Microsoft and the New York
Attorney General against an alleged spam ring
Alexei Moulton wrote:
I am running exim 4.12 with exiscan and spamassassin 6.1
The list of TESTS in X-Spam-Report header never includes BAYES and also
the bayes score from _BAYES_ is always 0.5000. From this i gather that the
bayes database is not being used?
not sure exactly what spamassassin
Ricki wrote:
Hi
Is there any danger in setting the spamdoption to m30 ?
Every now and again this happens
sendmail log.
hit max-children limit (20): waiting for some to exit
and mail is delayed.
I increased it from 5 > 7 > 10 > 20 now 30
Is this safe ?
any help will be appreciated.
What version of Linux are you using. I've had good luck
with upgrades using a little program called YUM or the Yellowdog Updater
Modified. When you need to upgrade you just type in yum --upgrade and it
solves all dependencies for you.
Page here:
http://linux.duke.edu/projects/yum/
-
Dam... Yet another attempt to install Razor2 foiled.
I get failed dependency errors for Mail::Internet and Digest::Nilsimsa when
I try and rpmbuild from the src.rpm
However when I use CPAN its telling me they are up to date.
Seems as if I'm never destined to get Razor installed. :-(
Alan
:-)
Anybody know how to reply or forward but still have the original
message-id in order to forget
an incorrect learnt spam message?
The idea is that my filter is gonna learn spam or ham depending on
status->is_spam
but I just want to reply thru my filter and capture the original
message id and un
At Thu Dec 18 12:03:19 2003, Martin, Jeremy wrote:
>
> By the way, I changed it a bit at the bottom to use html tables to
> make it a bit more readable. Thought I'd post what I came up with
> here in case anyone wanted to try it out.
>
> I'm using a little shell script as follows to save the outp
We only have one exchange server. Its 2003 upgraded from 2000
I don't know a lot about CDO but thus far I have only been able to find
methods that can retrieve specific parts of a message but nothing that
can retrieve the raw message as a whole. I'll keep looking though.
Thanks,
Tony B, CCNA, Ne
Thanks Kris!
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Deugau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 2:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Source RPMs - Razor2 and DCC
>
>
> Larry Gilson wrote:
> > Does anyone have up-to-date source RPMs for DC
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, mairhtin wrote:
> I am getting a new flood of spam that appears not to be even selling anything, but
> merely trying to get through the filters.
> Could they be trying to "learn" from this? I don't see how, but someone suggested
> as much.
>
> Here's a copy of the spam mail
I have my own domain and I have rules that automatically kick out any
message not addressed to recognised users at my domain. None of these
messages get anywhere
near SpamAssassin. Those that do I'm finding that required_hits of 0.6
is working quite well for me.
On Dec 18, 2003, at 2:09 PM, mai
Interesting - so it does sound like Public Folder issue and not just the
mechanism for accessing the store. Are all your Exchange servers the same
version or does the message traverse different versions of Exchange.
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony W. Bunce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of mairhtin
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 2:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] new spamming techniques are flooding me.
> Any suggestions?
>
> I am getting a new flood of spam
Are you using the backhair rules? If not, read the archive.
Alex
--
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:09:40 -0800
"mairhtin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am getting a new flood of spam that appears not to be even selling
> anything, but merely trying to get through the filters. Could they be
> trying to
It looks like just a badly setup spam with bayes poison. Either that or they
are trying to sell "beefy satin" :D
THe IP 200.223.153.82 is listed in quite a few RBLs. You might be able to
tag from that.
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: mairhtin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursd
Hi
Is there any danger in setting the spamdoption to
m30 ?
Every now and again this happens
sendmail log.
hit max-children limit (20): waiting for some
to exit
and mail is delayed.
I increased it from 5 > 7 > 10 > 20 now
30
Is this safe ?
any help will be appreciated.
Rega
I am getting a new flood of spam that appears not to be even selling anything, but
merely trying to get through the filters.
Could they be trying to "learn" from this? I don't see how, but someone suggested as
much.
Here's a copy of the spam mail and headers :
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
spamassassin -t < spam.mail shows the bayes score, high scores as
spam
spamc -y -u qscand < spam.mail does not show the bayes score, does not
score high as spam
I'm using qmail, qmail-scanner 1.20
running spamd as user qscand
After reading the spamd readme, I set local.cf to:
bayes_path /var/qsc
Larry Gilson wrote:
> Does anyone have up-to-date source RPMs for DCC (1.2.22)
Not me...
> and Razor2 (2.36 including the patch)?
... but I have posted these. ftp://ftp.deepnet.cx/pub/devel/razor/
SRPMS in ftp://ftp.deepnet.cx/pub/devel/SRPMS/.
Perl modules required for Razor/Razor2/SA/MIMEDe
I tried option 1 and it also modifies the headers the say way as if you
access the public folder with a IMAP client. Maybe the mail client
(outlook 2003 for me) is modifying the message when it moves the
message?
When I get some time I'll try option #2
Thanks,
Tony B, CCNA, Network+
Systems Admi
> I think it's an issue of public vs private folders. I have an
> IMAP script that pulls the files from an SA account just
> fine. It was when I tried to use public folders that the
> problem arose.
> --
Interesting discussion all the way around...
I have an RH 7.3+ box running sendmail, pr
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
[...]
> dccifd[3408]: [ID 528926 mail.error] missing message body
> spamd[15366]: DCCifd -> check skipped: Permission \
> denied Died at /opt/gnu/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 638.
just did an upgrade to 1.2.22 now i get ano
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 12:40, Hamilton, Kent wrote:
> I've done it via IMAP on both 5.5 and 2k and had no problems with the
> headers getting munged. I just went and checked 'em again by pulling them
> via IMAP dumping to a file and looking at 'em and the headers appear to be
> fine with no added M
Greetings,
Razor2 and DCC appear to work fine when invoking spamassassin from the
command line (as in spassassin -tD < spam). They do not appear to be
working at all when called during normal email processing (Mimedefang 2.39
calls spamassassin, also using sendmail 8.12.10). I have installed the
I was thinking of tackling this problem from the other end. Below are some
options from the Exchange list I subscribe to. I asked the question as to
how to extract the message to a text file. Presumably, the message would be
raw. The thought is that the extraction method would be a solution mor
I've done it via IMAP on both 5.5 and 2k and had no problems with the
headers getting munged. I just went and checked 'em again by pulling them
via IMAP dumping to a file and looking at 'em and the headers appear to be
fine with no added MS junk. You guys are making me nervous though because
we a
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 05:31:28PM -, Alan Munday wrote:
> Does this include the SDK?
No. You wouldn't find the SDK in a single RPM anyway. I should have
all the required module SRPMs in that directory though. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Anyone who thinks UNIX is intuitive should be
Does this include the SDK?
Alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Theo Van
Dinter
Sent: 18 December 2003 16:44
To: Larry Gilson
Cc: 'Spamassassin-List'
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Source RPMs - Razor2 and DCC
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:38:32AM -0
Since this morning I've a strange problem with SA 2.61 and Razor2
(razor-agents-sdk-2.03 and razor-agents-2.36).
My log say:
"spamd[13319]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Died at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassi
n/Dns.pm line 428, line 1. "
I've read some messages in t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hoyle
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 8:53 AM
> To: Tom Meunier; SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] importing spam from exchange users for sa-learn?
>
> > -Original Message-
I am running exim 4.12 with exiscan and spamassassin 6.1
The list of TESTS in X-Spam-Report header never includes BAYES and also
the bayes score from _BAYES_ is always 0.5000. From this i gather that the
bayes database is not being used?
not sure exactly what spamassassin -D --lint is showing m
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 December 2003 15:37
> To: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] importing spam from exchange users for sa-learn?
>
>
>
> Compare the headers. Mine was dragged & dropped into a
> public folder from a mailbox, using
Thanks Theo!
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have Razor at
> http://www.kluge.net/ftp/pub/felicity/SRPMS/razor-agents-2.36-1tvd.src.rpm
>
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:38:32AM -0500, Larry Gilson wrote:
> Does anyone have up-to-date source RPMs for DCC (1.2.22) and Razor2 (2.36
> including the patch)?
I have Razor at
http://www.kluge.net/ftp/pub/felicity/SRPMS/razor-agents-2.36-1tvd.src.rpm
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I'm just sa
--On Thursday, December 18, 2003 8:55 AM -0700 Brian Horncastle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been getting hit by allot of spam from a few spammers, so I set up a
> blacklist with SpamAssassin to explicitly block their messages. The
> problem I now have is that Postfix / SpamAssassin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of AltGrendel
>
> We're running Exchange 2k that was upgraded from 5.5, which
> was upgraded from ...(you get the idea). Anyway, I'm still
> seeing the old header style and I'm wondering if it's n
Hi,
I've been getting hit by allot of spam from a few spammers, so I set up a
blacklist with SpamAssassin to explicitly block their messages. The problem
I now have is that Postfix / SpamAssassin is sending bounces to the
spammers, and of course with most of the addresses being fakes I'm then
get
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 10:03, Yackley, Matt wrote:
>
SNIP!
>
> Here is what we saw while moving from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000:
> 1. Mail is sent through SA and marked up.
> 2. Message is sent from SA relay to Exchange 5.5 IMC (Internet Mail
> Connector)
> 3. Message that stayed with the 5.5
Hallo und guten Tag peter,
danke für die Email, die Du am 18.12.2003 um 16:25 schriebst - you wrote:
> Hi,
> today i have updated my Spamassassin via cpan on Debian Linux 3.0.
> After this i have an probblem with the config files like that:
> ---
> configuration file "/usr/share/spamassassin/20_
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hoyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 8:41 AM
> To: Tom Meunier; AltGrendel; SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] importing spam from exchange users for sa-learn?
> >
> Interesting... what did you set on exchange to make it do th
Hi,
today i have updated my Spamassassin via cpan on Debian Linux 3.0.
After this i have an probblem with the config files like that:
---
configuration file "/usr/share/spamassassin/20_body_tests.cf" requires version 2
60 of SpamAssassin, but this is code version 2.61. Maybe you need to use the -C
Thanks. I just updated. I'm WAY behind in a general rules update. And the
end of the year crunch is killing me :)
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:50 AM
> To: 'Stephen M. Przepiora'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> Chris S
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tony Hoyle
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 8:41 AM
> To: Tom Meunier; AltGrendel; SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] importing spam from exchange users for sa-learn?
>
> > -Original Message-
Hi Stephen
> Hello, I am running SA 2.55 with the bigevil and backhair rules. I
have
> been getting hit with seom spam lately by this one guy and he is
> relentless.
You possibly have the older version of the backhair rules. Check out
http://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm to be sure.
If you h
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 December 2003 14:20
> To: AltGrendel; SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] importing spam from exchange users for sa-learn?
>
>
> It doesn't beat 'em up too badly. Here's one I just pulled out of an
> Exchange 2000
Does anyone have up-to-date source RPMs for DCC (1.2.22) and Razor2 (2.36
including the patch)?
Thanks,
Larry
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of AltGrendel
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 7:54 AM
> To: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] importing spam from exchange users for sa-learn?
>
> Wasn't there a big issue with public folders stripp
Hello, I am running SA 2.55 with the bigevil and backhair rules. I have
been getting hit with seom spam lately by this one guy and he is
relentless.
The spam has an image that won't load, and the image is in an tag,
but the interesting thing is it is FULL of bad html tags:
Banned CD Governmen
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 00:38, Tony W. Bunce wrote:
> The way we have it setup is we have a public folder on the exchange server for spam
> (and/or ham)
> and there is a script on our spam server that reads the public folder, creates a
> file for each message,
> and deletes the message from the pu
Dan,
Thanks very much. That worked. I installed the Active perl 5.6.1.635 and
the installation went smoothly. Thanks for the timely help..
Regards
Sam
At 04:03 PM 12/17/2003, you wrote:
Samuel,
Michael Bell (the author of the HOWTO) recommends using ActivePerl 5.6.1
as that's what he's tested wit
Hello,
since a couple hours i'm using dccifd instead of dccproc.
when i start spamd using -D option all seems fine. dccifd gets found and
used by spamd, there are also DCC_CHECK in final scoring summery.
so when i start spamd wihtout the -D option (syslog gets a bit too huge
..) i get the followi
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_i
Hi there.
Is there any problem with the list?
I've stopped receiving any email.
Best regards.
Bruno Guerreiro
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
By the way, I changed it a bit at the bottom to use html tables to make it a bit more
readable. Thought I'd post what I came up with here in case anyone wanted to try it
out.
I'm using a little shell script as follows to save the output of the report script to
a .html file, then emailing it to
Hello guys,
I'm using SA for a long time now, but now run into trouble with
attachments sent through SA. In this case I was receiving PDF files as
attachments which
seem to be corrupted. Well, I compared the original and the corrupted
PDF file and I discovered that the corrupted one was half the
Yes this is the one I used and it was very useful but I had to dig for
some specific stuff like the site.config.m4 stuff so that libmilter is
implemented correctly. Also if you are on Solaris and want hash DB
files you need to stuff some more stuff in site.config.m4. You also
have to change the s
Hi,
Im using SpamAssassin Ver2.60 though amavisd-new-20030616 (platform Gentoo
Linux) and im trying to specify trusted networks thoughthe configuration
file /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
but for some reason SpamAssassin is still blocks email from the local
network which is not spam,
SPAM FROM L
On 15 Dec 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:45:00 +, Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
> spamassassin-talk:
> > (If you're paranoid, you could make sure that you don't have
> > confidential single tokens in there: bank account numbers and
> > important --- i.e., non-Mai
83 matches
Mail list logo
