Title: Message
I'm not sure if this went out or not, I apologize if it
double posted.
~~
Hi,
I checked the
archives looking for solutions to individual user preferences not being read
from mysql even though the @GLOBAL settings were but did not find any posts t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Colin,
Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 1:17:13 PM, you wrote:
CAB> What is everyone's feeling on spreading rules about? I would guess
CAB> it's more effective to tell as many people as possible, via the
CAB> list, about the rules. But as soon as the
At Wed Nov 5 14:16:04 2003, me& wrote:
>
> In the spamd configuration file (/etc/default/spamassassin on debian) I had
> to add '-F 0' to the startup options.
As far as I can tell, the -F flag was removed from spamd prior to
version 2.40 of SpamAssassin. This indicates that you're running 2.31
Example 1. Use spamc/spamd, it defaults to only scanning messages under
250k and you can change that limit with spamc's -s switch.
Example 2. What version of Spamassassin are you running? There's a
whole ton of tests based upon the ratio of image to text.
-tom
___
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs
This page explains how to add your own RTBLs.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
Nigel Featherston wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if SpamAssassin uses the following blacklists:
>
> rhsbl.ahbl.org
If it's already 100% sure that it's spam, how is it helpful to train it
that it's spam? It's not like it's going to be 110% sure that it's
spam. It's already trained!
Not trying to be a wise-ass, I've just seen this question come up fairly
often, and can't wrap my head around it.
-tom
> -O
> "JM" == Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Going to write /home/kreme/.cpan/Metadata
>>> Mail::SpamAssassin is up to date.
>>>
force install Mail::SpamAssassin
JM> Great. We'll have to avoid using rcN designations in future I think...
Yep. Just stick with the underscores.
-
I think you may be putting a lock on the recipe that runs spamc - you
don't want to do that. The only time you need to lock in procmail is
when you're writing to a file that might be called by multiple
procmail processes at one time.
So, instead of:
:0 fw:
| spamc
you want:
:0 fw
Zlatko Hristov wrote:
I am trying to setup SA on Qmail gateway/relay server. All the mailboxes
are on Exchange, Qmail does filtering only with qmailscanner and SA. SA
marks the message with Spam status= yes.
I have a similar setup where I receive all the mails, pass them through
Q-S, spamassasin a
> Spamassassin 2.54 Cobalt Raq4 w/sendmail, mailscanner, Clam antivirus
>
> After making some changes to my custom.cf I tried to restart spamd:
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd restart
>
> I get returned with:
> spamdCould not create INET socket: Address already in use
> IO::Socket::INET:
> Address alread
Hi there,
I just installed spamassassin 2.60 and everything worked fine. However I
to get spamassassin running I need the perl HTML parser 3.24 (or older)
and on the machine I'm using (and I'm not root and root is not cooperating
on installing a newer version) 3.21 is installed. Is there a way t
Fellow Assassins,
Here is an example of some of the URLs coming through in spam mail.
http://www
Would a rule like /w/ match this?
Regards,
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does Sourc
I received 3 identical spams from the same e-mail address that did not
get classified as spam. I tried to do a sa-learn --spam on the message,
and it said it learned from 1 message, but when I tried to filter the
message again, the Bayesian filter says that the spam probability is 0
to 1%. I even
I am contemplating using the spamproxyd.pl code for spam filtering. It seems
to function, but I am trying to setup spam filtering on a dedicated machine
The problem is that the mail server may go down or refuse connections and
I want the spamproxyd.pl code to either queue or retry during these dow
Here is our setup...
2 inbound mail servers solaris running sendmail, one primary one
secondary. Secondary has all users inboxes NFS mounted to the primary
and 4 imap/pop servers.
If I crank up spamd/spamc things start to bog down greatly.. I never see
but one spamd/spamc process at a time b
Spamassassin 2.54 Cobalt Raq4 w/sendmail, mailscanner, Clam antivirus
After making some changes to my custom.cf I tried to restart spamd:
/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd restart
I get returned with:
spamdCould not create INET socket: Address already in use IO::Socket::INET:
Address already in use
what c
I would like to have my users be able to forward spam that they receive to
an email address like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I would then configure my
mail server to send this email through "sa-learn -spam". Do I need to worry
about first stripping off "FW: ", the from address (this would be my user
an
Hello,
I would like to know if SpamAssassin uses the following blacklists:
rhsbl.ahbl.org
dnsbl.ahbl.org
And I would also like to know under what conditions they are enabled
(i.e. by default, etc.)
Thank you very much,
Nigel Featherston
---
I've been working hard to build a network that
stops spam from entering mail boxes, but I'm getting tired of what appears to be
solutions to problems that don't need solving.
EXAMPLE:Message comes in that is 13 Megs (big
attachment) -> message goes quickly through spamassassin, but sits in
Chris Santerre Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:15 PM
> Finally got another update done. The Emporium is going to go through some
> MAJOR changes in the coming months. For all of those people that contacted
> me about mirroring the site, Thank You! I'm all set for now, secret plans
to
> take ove
> Hi there,
> I just installed spamassassin 2.60 and everything worked fine. However I
> to get spamassassin running I need the perl HTML parser 3.24 (or older)
> and on the machine I'm using (and I'm not root and root is not cooperating
> on installing a newer version) 3.21 is installed. Is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Robert,
Wednesday, November 5, 2003, 8:37:22 AM, you wrote:
RLI> What threshold most of you use out there? I realize that it
RLI> probably isn't the same number for each of you, but certainly the
RLI> 'default' isn't enough anymore..
I use a
How hard would it be to create a new rule for BAYES scoring that IS used
by autolearn?
Specifically, when I see this:
* BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.]
in the header, I'm fairly comfortable with having it autolearnt and
letting my .procmailrc script s
At 08:57 PM 11/5/2003, Nigel Featherston wrote:
I would like to know if SpamAssassin uses the following blacklists:
rhsbl.ahbl.org
dnsbl.ahbl.org
And I would also like to know under what conditions they are enabled
(i.e. by default, etc.)
No they are not used by default, and there's no built-in ru
No, but you can enable it if you like. Their web site tells you how.
Just save this text as /etc/mail/spamassassin/something.cf
http://www.ahbl.org/using/spamassassin.txt
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Nigel Featherston
> Sen
Title: SignatureENCH Stationery
Hello,
I am trying to setup
SA on Qmail gateway/relay server. All the mailboxes are on Exchange, Qmail does
filtering only with qmailscanner and SA.
Can I setup
qmailscanner/qmail so it will copy or send or delete the message with Spam
status=yes header
:) i find this kind of thing very therapudic. on the same equivilance of
telling the evening news on TV how full of crap the politians are (that's
true the world over).perhaps this was an experiment come from Dr
Electron's psycology 'expertise'. muahahahahahah
-Original Message---
Dear folks,
I am trying to reply to a post, and suddenly, all throughout the day, I get
messages like these:
-
Nov 6 01:10:01 asarian-host sendmail[49251]: hA609idi049249:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(1074/1074), delay=00:00:17, xdelay=00:
Yes i also found this 'Smart Gateway' rather entertaining. i hope he
didn't just write an article but took out a patent on this new invention of
his. even in 2002 NAT/port forwarding has been used for centuries before
then. :)One shudders to think what massive breakthrough's hes made in
his
I would like to know if SpamAssassin uses the following blacklists:
rhsbl.ahbl.org
dnsbl.ahbl.org
And I would also like to know under what conditions they are enabled
(i.e. by default, etc.)
(Not a SpamAssassin user at the moment.)
Thanks,
Nigel
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
>At 07:16 PM 11/5/2003, Lukreme wrote:
>>My spam assassin is still 2.60-rc6:
>>
>>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,CLICK_BELOW
>>autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc6
>>
>>So
>>
>
>
>
>>Going to write /home/kr
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Cline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Spam Assassin Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:48 AM
> Subject: [SAtalk] Anti-SA article: "ISP Assassin"
>
> http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
>
> Hmmm... The ar
At 07:16 PM 11/5/2003, Lukreme wrote:
My spam assassin is still 2.60-rc6:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,CLICK_BELOW
autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc6
So
Going to write /home/kreme/.cpan/Metadata
Mail::SpamAssassin is up to date.
cpan>
color me confused
CPAN thinks o
I have been running spamassassin for quite a while and upgrading using
cpan the entire time.
I recently tried upgrading to 2.60, but it some tests and won't
install. I was wondering if
someone could give me a few tips on where to look to get it working again.
Thanks,
Greg
t/spamd_maxsize..
Haha this guy "Doctor Electron" is a moron oops I defamed him...
His paper "The Smart Gateway: Port-to-Local-Host Address Mapping" was
also entertaining
tm.
Matthew Cline wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generate
On 05 Nov 2003, at 17:00, Robert Leonard III wrote:
I'd like to add negative points to an email that comes in saying:
" I love Fuzz99.com's products!"
But to NOT add these negative points if it says:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED], you are a winner!"
well, in regex you would say
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
--
"Queen
At 06:52 PM 11/5/2003, Robert Leonard III wrote:
Do I need to restart SpamD every time I make a modification or add a new .cf
file to my configuration?
Yes, SA only parses the .cf files when it first starts up. Only user_prefs
is parsed each time a message comes in.
If so, when I do a restart, w
My spam assassin is still 2.60-rc6:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,CLICK_BELOW
autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc6
So
cpan> install Mail::SpamAssassin
CPAN: Storable loaded ok
Going to read /home/kreme/.cpan/Metadata
Database was generated on Sun, 02 Nov 2003 12:45:5
One more for the gang, if you will permit..
I'd like to add a negative point to any email coming in that contains my
company name, but.. and it's a big butt, I don't want it to apply the
negative point if the reference to the company name is in email format..
For example.. say.. my company name i
Do I need to restart SpamD every time I make a modification or add a new .cf
file to my configuration? If so, when I do a restart, what happens to all
those messages that are currently being analyzed? When I restarted just a
minute ago, there were 10 ID's running.. SA restarted and now there is j
I found a rule to check for white on white text to spot possible spam.
However, I am finding that spammers are not including the body color as
white since the email client background default color is white. Thanks.
How could you write the following rule to give the email a score if ,
was missing
Title: Message
Hi,
I've got SA +
vpopmail + mysql. I am trying to get the mysql userpref functionality working. I
verified that @GLOBAL works from mysql but the individual userpref's do
not.
I added a little
debug routine inside of qmail-scanner-queue.pl and I can see that the email
rec
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
>
> Its crap like this article that keep ISPs from even telling users
> they have the ability to use SA!!! I've seen major ISPs never tell
> there customers unless they ask for some antispam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Kelly writes:
>The following mail gets a score of 0.1. How come?
BAYES_00. You need to train on more 419 scams ;)
- --j.
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_24_48,
>FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, NO_REAL_NAME, TO_
--On Wednesday, November 05, 2003 2:07 PM + Darren Coleman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The funny thing about that article is that he claims his "private email"
> was altered, when in fact the email in question was a wide-copy
> unsolicited press release. I normally call the latter spam.
>
Justin Mason wrote:
[...]
Further examination of the raw message showed that the MIME boundaries
don't seem to match, therefore Mozilla obviously can't decompose the
message.
[...]
anyone??? I really need to get this solved ASAP, since users are already
complaining... :-(
Sorry, I haven't a clue.
>I scored them super high in a fit of rage.
...that makes me smile. I can picture you leaning back in your chair,
watching the next one come through with a score of 790, laughing
maniacally and flutter kicking your feet in the air. :)
/My dog is very promiscuous\./
...while enigmatic, this co
Someone asked if Nov rules replaces Oct rules. Nope. They are additional
rules.
They also asked about the "Rule authors general goal comments in the files."
like DomainDigits1.cf. They wanted to see more of them.
They also asked if all of the rules could be placed in a big tar file.
All this
A friend sent me this one:
http://j-walk.com/other/spamu/index.htm
Not just an education... a career."
Welcome to Spam University, the world's top-rated educational institution
for the growing spam industry.
Are you tired of your dead-end job? Want to make some big-time cash without
actually wo
> First of all.. a HUGE thank you to everybody who has put all
> the work in to
> the "Supplimental" rulesets that I have been adding to my
> setup.. what a
> difference they have made!!! The only drawback seems to be
> that the rules
> seem to catch something 'spamish' in just about any email
At Wed Nov 5 16:57:04 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> All have a tracking header, but name changed:
> Kel-Tracking:
> The key is it they ALL ended with "==>"
That string is the base64 encoding of
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Base64 encoding in that form will
end in ==> or => or just > depending on the
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> All have a tracking header, but name changed:
> Kel-Tracking:
> The key is it they ALL ended with "==>"
That looks like base64, if you drop the < and >. Running it through
"mmencode -b -u" gives "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", how surprising.
The "=" signs are
You really might want to consider rebuilding your bayes db if a spam came
through with bayes_00...
I was having wishy-washy bayes results a while back for some reason. Lots
of ham and spam came in with bayes scoring ~40-~60. After I rebuilt,
almost every spam gets bayes_90 or 99 and most ham get
Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
>
> Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generates spam, since it
> inserts an "ad" for SA into messages it tags for spam (though I fail
> to see how a link to http://spamassassin.org/tag/ cou
> Chris Santerre Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:42 PM
>
> > THe idea is that you WILL stop more spam in total if you share them.
> > Sorry, I got a little excited! Share your rules!
>
> My rules are attached. Here's the story behind them. Over the
> past month I
> got about 15 FN's in my p
> seem to catch something 'spamish' in just about any email now.. so my
> threshold of 5.5 just doesn't seem practical..
>
> What threshold most of you use out there?
My low threshold is 5.0, and my high was 8.0, but I found even with Bayes_90
set at 6.00, I still get a ton of spam scoring 7.4-7.8
>
> http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
>
> Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generates spam,
> since it inserts an
> "ad" for SA into messages it tags for spam (though I fail to
> see how a link
> to http://spamassassin.org/tag/ could be considered an ad).
>
[this is a repost. yesterday i posted this and it never showed up on the
list. lost on sf.net? sorry if it's a duplicate. -cb]
Chris Santerre Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:42 PM
> THe idea is that you WILL stop more spam in total if you share them.
> Sorry, I got a little excited! Share your
Apologies in advance if this question has been asked and answered many
times over and I have just missed it. It also ends up being more a
sendmail question but since this has occurred since installing and
running SA I think there is relevance.
Configuration
SA 2.60 is referenced from procmail
Robert Leonard III Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 11:37 AM
> What threshold most of you use out there? I realize that it probably
isn't
> the same number for each of you, but certainly the 'default' isn't enough
> anymore..
I still use the default 5. It works just fine for me and since I get
>
> At Wed Nov 5 16:57:04 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >
> > All have a tracking header, but name changed:
> > Kel-Tracking:
> > The key is it they ALL ended with "==>"
>
> That string is the base64 encoding of
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Base64 encoding in that form will
> end in ==> or => or ju
The following mail gets a score of 0.1. How come?
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_24_48, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, NO_REAL_NAME, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.60-jdk.2.9.1
Body:
Permit me to introduce myself – I am fredu makudo,
special Aide to the
Title: Nachricht
HI to
all!!
I have a BIG problem with sa-learn. In debug-mode
sa-learn told me, he can't use Bayes because DB_File is not
installed.
DB_File and
AnyDBM_File are up to date.
What can I
do?
Thanks
debug: Score set 0 chosen.debug: running in
taint mode? yesdebug
I've been using one for PowerMTA for a while. I know it has legit uses, and
I've scored it low just for testing.
278 spams / 68 hams MY_POWERMTA
out of ~7500 spams.
Not that heavy a hitter :(
--Chris
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: S
First of all.. a HUGE thank you to everybody who has put all the work in to
the "Supplimental" rulesets that I have been adding to my setup.. what a
difference they have made!!! The only drawback seems to be that the rules
seem to catch something 'spamish' in just about any email now.. so my
thres
Matt, thanks for this. It's a great resource. However, I'm wondering
why the following were scored as zero and thus don't have numbers to
support their efficacy or lack thereof:
0.000 0. 0.0.500 0.110.00 RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK
0.000 0. 0.0.500 0.110.
> /My dog is very promiscuous\./
>
> ...while enigmatic, this could very well hit quite a few porn spams!
>
LOL!!
I looked thru some corpus and I have a bunch of these spams. They score from
8.5-24 points :)
Common points among the spams:
Sent from differnt IP's (What a surprise!)
All have a
Damn stupid FP's from another list!! ARGH Already fixed on the website.
Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: Colin A. Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 9:15 PM
> To: Chris Santerre; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Rule Emporium Up
> > I'm just beginning to use 'exim' (now have qmail) but
> > I've seen something like this, when a config file had
> > spurious ^M () in it, so SOME things
> > were written as
> > ...half headernext half
> > or a File was editeid in Win* AND in UNIX,
> > and got single 's in Variable/Header
In my experience users find it a lot easier to create rules that catch
"*SPAM*" than "X-Spam-Header", etc. It's certainly a lot easier
from a Tech Support perspective explaining it on the phone. :)
The funny thing about that article is that he claims his "private email"
was altered, when
Apologies for being slightly OT.
I'm looking for an example of a webpage that a sender might be directed to
if their email got bounced due to spam blocking measures, something that in
a lot of flowery words says "you're here because your ISP sends us too much
shit, so to contact us fill in this
Here is our setup...
2 inbound mail servers solaris running sendmail, one primary one
secondary. Secondary has all users inboxes NFS mounted to the primary
and 4 imap/pop servers.
If I crank up spamd/spamc things start to bog down greatly.. I never see
but one spamd/spamc process at a time b
> http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
>
> Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generates spam,
> since it inserts an
> "ad" for SA into messages it tags for spam (though I fail to
> see how a link
> to http://spamassassin.org/tag/ could be considered an ad).
> It
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 00:28:58 -0800
Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
>
> Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generates spam, since it inserts an
> "ad" for SA into messages it tags for spam (though I fail to see how a link
Very helpful tool for regex
http://weitz.de/regex-coach/
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Menschel
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:00 AM
To: Christopher Eykamp
Cc: Spamassassin Talk
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RegEx Question
W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Carlos,
Wednesday, November 5, 2003, 2:38:29 AM, you wrote:
CJS> First of all thanks for your reply.
My pleasure.
>> I ran your rules against my personal corpus (scores are xx spam / xx
>> ham of 43,638 emails in my corpus):
CJS> Hummm this
Title: SignatureENCH Stationery
Hello,
I am trying to setup
SA on Qmail gateway/relay server. All the mailboxes are on Exchange, Qmail does
filtering only with qmailscanner and SA. SA marks the message with Spam status=
yes.
Can I setup
qmailscanner/qmail so it will copy or send or del
Fred I-IS.COM Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 6:14 PM
> I came up with another idea to tackle these, I really liked that spam, you
> can say it inspired me because it too slipped past my SA rules!
> full FVGT_rb_WICKED_SPAM_12
> /.{1,2}.{1,2}.{1,2}.{0,400}<\/td>/is
> describe FVGT_rb_WICKED_SPA
> I'm just beginning to use 'exim' (now have qmail) but
> I've seen something like this, when a config file had
> spurious ^M () in it, so SOME things
> were written as
> ...half headernext half
> or a File was editeid in Win* AND in UNIX,
> and got single 's in Variable/Header Definitions
>
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:41:05AM +0100, me& wrote:
> When I check out the 'source' of the mail I can see this :
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 09:26:41 +0100
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 5 09:26:41 2003
> the rest of all the headers and the actual mail
Hi Robert,
First of all thanks for your reply.
Robert Menschel wrote:
I ran your rules against my personal corpus (scores are xx spam / xx ham
of 43,638 emails in my corpus):
MAILER_LPI -- 0s/0h of 43638 corpus
MAILER_FM -- 0s/0h of 43638 corpus
MAILER_AM -- 1s/0h of 43638 corpus
MAILER_PMTA
Hello
people,Spamassassin version : 2.20 (Debian package
2.20-1woody)Exim version 3.35recently I installed Spamassassin
to work with Exim.Let me first explain my problem before I describe the
configuration.All the mails that go through Spamassassin are delivered to
the mailboxesbut they ar
http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generates spam, since it inserts an
"ad" for SA into messages it tags for spam (though I fail to see how a link
to http://spamassassin.org/tag/ could be considered an ad). It considers
rule des
hi
I am using SA 2.6 on a Linux box [sendmail/procmail]. Things have been ok till now.
Since 2 days spamd is taking up too much memory. We had 256 MB RAM, I increased both
the RAM and Swap space today. Still things haven't improved.
What could be wrong? Are there any files in .spammassassin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>anyone??? I really need to get this solved ASAP, since users are already
>complaining... :-(
Hi Ralf --
Sorry, I haven't a clue. :( I've never seen a message's boundaries
being "lost" like that. Have you checked with the amavis list?
- --j.
HI!
You can test this one:
Spamfilter.sh:
#!/bin/sh
# spamfilter.sh
INSPECT_DIR=/var/spam
SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail
SPAMASSASSIN=/usr/bin/spamc
EX_TEMPFAIL=75
EX_UNAVAILABLE=69
cd $INSPECT_DIR || { echo $INSPECT_DIR does not exist; exit $EX_TEMPFAIL; }
trap "rm -f in.$$; rm -f out.$$" 0 1 2 3
Hi there,
anyone??? I really need to get this solved ASAP, since users are already
complaining... :-(
Thanks,
Ralf
Original Message
Subject: "report_safe 1" breaks MIME messages
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:41:01 +0100
From: Ralf G. R. Bergs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: spamassassin-
87 matches
Mail list logo
