> http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
>
> Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generates spam,
> since it inserts an
> "ad" for SA into messages it tags for spam (though I fail to
> see how a link
> to http://spamassassin.org/tag/ could be considered an ad).
> It considers
> rule descriptions like "Uses words and phrases which indicate
> porn" to be
> defimation, which could get ISPs and SA developers sued. And
> it considers
> that altering email messages is likely a crime, similar to
> tampering with
> postal mail.
>
This article is almost a year old (dec 2002)! An eternity in
net time. AAMOF, Deersoft was already being acquired by
Network Associates by that time. Wow, I saw very little fact
in the article anyway. Most of the article was laughably
inaccurate.
But just to be sure, I asked every
employee at my place of employment (50+) to tell me if they
were upset that I was tagging 'suspected' spam by changing
the subject. Not a single person was concerned and asked if
I could lower the score at which I shunt the spam to ground
(err.. forward email to /dev/null).
Mike Schrauder
www.specialtyblades.com
www.olfablades.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
