Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html > > Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generates spam, since it > inserts an "ad" for SA into messages it tags for spam (though I fail > to see how a link to http://spamassassin.org/tag/ could be considered > an ad). It considers rule descriptions like "Uses words and phrases > which indicate porn" to be defimation, which could get ISPs and SA > developers sued. And it considers that altering email messages is > likely a crime, similar to tampering with postal mail.
The author is a complete and utter moron. Too bad they didn't use their real name (typical) -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes Computer Systems Manager ph: 979-845-7801 Department of Physics fax: 979-845-2590 Texas A&M University ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
