Matt, thanks for this. It's a great resource. However, I'm wondering why the following were scored as zero and thus don't have numbers to support their efficacy or lack thereof:
0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.11 0.00 RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.11 0.00 RCVD_IN_MAPS_RSS 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.11 0.00 RCVD_IN_MAPS_RBL 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.11 0.00 RCVD_IN_MAPS_DUL 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.11 0.00 RCVD_IN_MAPS_NML 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.11 0.00 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET -tom > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Matt Kettler > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:19 PM > To: Steve Heggood; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Best Blacklists > > > just use: grep RCVD_IN_ STATISTICS-set1.txt > > > As a quick example: > OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME > 39.058 56.1503 0.2042 0.996 0.98 1.10 RCVD_IN_DSBL > > This means that DSBL match 39% of all email in the test, > 56.15% of the spam, and 0.2042% of the nonspam. > > By comparison NJABL didn't do nearly as well, it got about > the same amount of spam, but over 10x more nonspam. > > 41.161 57.6715 3.6322 0.941 0.84 0.10 RCVD_IN_NJABL > > OPM has impressively low nonspam hit rate, but it's spam hit > rate isn't quite as high as some others (less than half the > spam hit rate of DSBL, but 1/50th the nonspam hit rate): > 15.868 22.8473 0.0040 1.000 0.95 4.30 RCVD_IN_OPM > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
