--On Wednesday, November 05, 2003 2:07 PM +0000 Darren Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The funny thing about that article is that he claims his "private email" > was altered, when in fact the email in question was a wide-copy > unsolicited press release. I normally call the latter spam. > > Still, it's refreshing to see an alternative slant on SA - the author > almost managed to hide his contempt for having his spammy email tagged > in his vitriol. Almost, but not quite. Didn't the schmu.. (wait.. that'd be slander..) gentleman realize that if he e-mailed a organization, and that organization CHOOSE to install SpamAssassin, that that is because they DON'T want cra... messages like his?Most ISP's I've seen allow SA to be turned off on a per individual basis. So if Joe Writer wants all the Spa... Press Releases, he can turn off SA. Now I can see how an idi... someone could see the "This message has been marked as spam. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details." might be construed as SPAM - IF there were banner ads, links to PURCHASE SA, etc. But I agree with the concensus - this sch... gentleman is upset his Press Release IS... err I'm sorry - somehow got marked as spam. Evan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
