On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 00:28:58 -0800 Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html > > Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generates spam, since it inserts an > "ad" for SA into messages it tags for spam (though I fail to see how a link > to http://spamassassin.org/tag/ could be considered an ad). It considers > rule descriptions like "Uses words and phrases which indicate porn" to be > defimation, which could get ISPs and SA developers sued. And it considers > that altering email messages is likely a crime, similar to tampering with > postal mail. Gee!!!! I'd better check may mail server config to avoid any problems! It insists in add a Received: line on all messages it gets trough! Damn! Altering the message subject should be taken seriously, though... headers are for sysadmin, except the Subject, which is dealt by the user. SA provides a way to not alter the Subject line, it is a sysadmin decision, so *the sysadmin* could be sued, not the software developer. And the only one who could sue someone is the end user... BTW, I've seen some spam coming trough angelfire.com lately... -- Marcio Merlone ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
