KK> There is currently no mechanism at all
KK> that is part of the Internet which can lock out machines that
KK> are dangerous or detrimental to the functions of the network.
KK> There are no processes in place that identify users of infected
KK> systems and keep them off the network.
Actually, t
Sorry, doesn't seem to work.
I'm using SA 2.55, if that makes a difference.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 12:41 PM
To: [EM
"Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Before I submit a bug report on this I wanted to check my understanding.
>
> If I get what's going on, RBL checks such as NJABL_DIALUP and DYNABLOCK
> are checked, and weigh in heavily when they are the last hop before local
> machines, so
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 11:22:35AM +1000, Terry Allen wrote:
> 1 Is it possible to install Spam Assassin for filtering & deleting
> the spam without altering the existing sendmail configuration?
Yes, there is. If your machine is already using procmail as the
mailer for local delivery, it is enou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Bernd,
Saturday, September 13, 2003, 5:34:11 PM, you wrote:
BK> since I am not the only having this problem according to some other
BK> newsgroup I would like to ask why the Bayes filter does not help.
I'm not one of the most technically advan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Daniel,
Would you have any objection if we added your link to the "Other rules
sites" section of http://www.exit0.us/ ?
Bob Menschel
Friday, September 12, 2003, 11:36:29 PM, you wrote:
DL> Guys,
DL> FYI, I've released a bunch of rules to de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Sérgio,
Saturday, September 13, 2003, 2:17:11 PM, you wrote:
SMB> Hi
SMB> Is it possible spamassassin eats an email or for sure just tag
SMB> email ?
I've never had SpamAssassin eat any email. SpamAssassin has no code
within it to delete or dr
On Saturday, Sep 13th 2003 at 22:39 -0400, quoth Steven W. Orr:
=>I upgraded and now I have the following error message on every mail
=>message:
=>
=>dccproc[11141]: no valid DCC server hostnames
=>
=>I did delete the old /var/dcc/map and copied in the new map.txt and then
=>ran cdcc 'new map'.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:39:27PM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> I upgraded and now I have the following error message on every mail
> message:
> What else am I suppoed to do?
does "dccproc -H < message" work? if not, you'll have to ask the DCC folks.
if so, try a SA -D run and see what the outp
I upgraded and now I have the following error message on every mail
message:
dccproc[11141]: no valid DCC server hostnames
I did delete the old /var/dcc/map and copied in the new map.txt and then
ran cdcc 'new map'.
What else am I suppoed to do?
TIA
--
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 04:32:47PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>> Anybody running spamc from procmail with sendmail is vulnerable to
>> having
>> their server overloaded because of uncontrolled concurancy of local
>> deliveries - despite the options mentioned above, sendmail just doesn't
>> have
Guys,
FYI, I've released a bunch of rules to detect Brazilian spams. This is just
the beginning. Hopefully I'll get help from the community over here to make
better rules. I'll try to release a new version every two weeks. The URL is
www.lafraia.com.br/spambr/br_rules.cf
Thanks
-Daniel Lafraia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> "Mike Loiterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'm getting a growing number of messages that appear to have been
>> skipped by SA.
>
> spamc skips large messages by default. That could be it.
>
> SpamAssassin doesn't ti
Hello,
since I am not the only having this problem according to some other
newsgroup I would like to ask why the Bayes filter does not help.
Ok, the long story: Since yesterday I am bombarded with spam. Those
mails look like bounces of mails I sent, but I didn´t.
As To: adress is some random n
I've reached the point where my email client isn't able to handle all of
the rule matching analysis I'm asking of it. So I'm trying to get
mass-check to work so I can analyze individual rules.
Minor handicap: I'm a domain user on a shared virtual domain server. I don't
have admin access to most o
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Terry Allen wrote:
> 1 Is it possible to install Spam Assassin for filtering & deleting
> the spam without altering the existing sendmail configuration? If so,
> could somoeone point me to some sort of wlakthrough or eail me with
> some details please.
Yes. Sendmail is pr
Hi there,
I have yet to download Spam Assassin, but I am seriously
looking at it & wonder if anyone would mind replying to this, taking
into account the following information.
I am running a low volume Mac OSX (client version, not
server), machine which runs server applications from Tenon
in
Hi,
After a week of collecting spams and hams my Bayes database has finally
activated in SpamAssassin :)
I have a customer site which I have also installed SA but their
auto-learn is picking up spam at a very slow rate.
Are there any problems with copying my Bayes DB from my server to theirs
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael W. Cocke wrote:
| I think the odds are against it being either of these 2 programs, but
| I'm losing what's left of my mind Mailman won't send any
| mail No error messages, logs look ok, and it doesn't LOOK like
| mimedefang or spamas
Hi
Is it possible spamassassin eats an email or for sure just tag email ?
thanks
--
SérgioMB
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who gives me one shell, give me everything.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:55:27PM -0500, Bill Polhemus wrote:
> I run SA 2.55.
> I'd like both "learned" and "scanned", if possible.
>
> I tried the check_bayes_db script, fwiw, and saw nothing but a long, long
> list of words that (apparently) have been tokenized in the database.
yeah. look at
> Just for a data point, rc4 did not overwrite local.cf on my linux
> machine. "perl Makefile.PL; make; make install"
Nor mine...
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
I run SA 2.55.
I'd like both "learned" and "scanned", if possible.
I tried the check_bayes_db script, fwiw, and saw nothing but a long, long
list of words that (apparently) have been tokenized in the database.
Is there any way to get more information (or a more readable report) than
that?
Will
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 11:49:43AM -0500, Bill Polhemus wrote:
> Is there a script available to tell me simply how many emails I have
> processed through "SA-LEARN?"
Do you mean "processed through Bayes?"
> I would just like to know how many SPAM and
> HAM messages have passed through the data
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 17:54, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 04:36:02PM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> > that I can just add?
>
> The point is moot. Sobig.F expired on 10-Sep-2003, due to an
> internal timebomb.
The timebomb appears to be somewhat of a damp squib.
Our mail ser
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 11:49:43AM -0500, Bill Polhemus wrote:
> Is there a script available to tell me simply how many emails I have
> processed through "SA-LEARN?" I would just like to know how many SPAM and
> HAM messages have passed through the database.
That you've scanned, or that you've l
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:34:40PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> 2. SobigF expired on September 10th. There may be a few
> errant worms floating around from computers that have their
> dates wrong, but you probably won't see many.
You won't see any. Earlier version of Sobig did use local
clocks
I SEND AN EMAIL and it bounce b/c i used a blacklist expression
just veryfying my email did not get blacklisted
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 04:36:02PM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> that I can just add?
The point is moot. Sobig.F expired on 10-Sep-2003, due to an
internal timebomb.
That being said, SpamAssassin-2.55 caught Sobig.F just fine for
me, no local tuning required.
See http://vvv.koehntopp.de/rrd/kri
Is there a script available to tell me simply how many emails I have
processed through "SA-LEARN?" I would just like to know how many SPAM and
HAM messages have passed through the database.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welc
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 09:41:26AM -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
> What is your rule of thumb for the Postfix max process limit and the number
> of spamc max children?
I started with 5 and pushed it up from there when it appeared the machine
could handle it. 5 was a very cautious number; I set it so
I'm curious. Can you not just use "rpmbuild --rebuild" on the .src.rpm
alone, and not worry about the .spec file?
That's what I do, and it seems to work okay.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EM
Michael W. Cocke wrote on Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:52:09 -0400:
> they won't
> accept messages from my domain because I use dyndns and not a static
> IP.
>
No problem, use the smarthost given by your provider. That's what it's
for.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive In
Hi Jim,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim
> I actually do use the -m switch, but on top of that I use a
> concurrency limit on the spamc transport (I am using
> Postfix). So Postfix will never launch more than "n" copies
> of spamc, and will trickle the mails out of the queue when
>
On Friday 12 September 2003 17:56 CET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Malte, I'm not sure if I ever got a response back to you after this, but
> I sent a message back to list saying that I couldn't UNINST=1 like you
> suggested.
No, sorry I didn't answer. I tried to find any logic in that but couldn't.
Excellent catch. Thank you. I still think that score is a little high
for a subject having spaces. Can I configure that test in local.cf to
be lower? Any other way without changing 50_scores?
>>> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9/11/2003 2:19:22 PM >>>
At 01:07 PM 9/11/2003 -0400, Alicia Fors
Hello All,
I am a new Spam Assassin user via Tenon Intersystems Post.Office mail
server. Tenon has release a Spam Assassin plug-in for their OS X based mail
server.
I have Spam Assassin up and running and trapping spam via Post.Office. The
problem is that I can't seem to get the 'always_add_hea
On Friday 12 September 2003 21:12 CET German Staltari wrote:
> Hi list, i would like to warn about the overwriting of the local.cf file
> when you do a make install. Hopefully i have a backup of the file :).
Could you please send me the generated Makefile (should be in your source
directory) to m
On Saturday 13 September 2003 00:17 CET Mike Loiterman wrote:
> Be careful! I just upgraded to 2.60rc4 and my
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf got blown away.
Could you please send me the generated Makefile (should be in your source
directory) to my e-mail address?
Thanks,
Malte
---
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:20:49AM -0400, Covington, Chris wrote:
> It can't be that specific. There must be some way such as a header
> regexp that searches for "unknown" or the lack of a DNS name:
Well, we can already look up Received IPs in RBLs, so it can't be much
harder to just do a reverse
I am having difficulty, and was wondering if anyone
can shed some light on the subject.
I can't get spam assassin to read any user_prefs
file.
it works with the local.cf just fine.
is there something i've missed?
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, AWShirley wrote:
> I'm trying to install DB_File from CPAN so I can use Bayes, but the install fails.
> I get these error messages:
>
> version.c:30:16: db.h: No such file or directory
> make: *** [version.o] Error 1
> /usr/bin/make -- NOT OK
> Running make test
> Can't
Just for a data point, rc4 did not overwrite local.cf on my linux
machine. "perl Makefile.PL; make; make install"
Mojo
On 12 Sep 2003, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> "Mike Loiterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Be careful! I just upgraded to 2.60rc4 and my
> > /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf g
Hello David,
Friday, September 12, 2003, 11:04:28 AM, you wrote:
DBF> On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Abigail Marshall wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't know but I have the same problem. It seems to
>> happen when my bayes_toks file reaches about 5k.
>>
>> So far, I've lost the bayes database 3 times. If I monitor
Before I submit a bug report on this I wanted to check my understanding.
If I get what's going on, RBL checks such as NJABL_DIALUP and DYNABLOCK
are checked, and weigh in heavily when they are the last hop before local
machines, so even if a dynamicly listed IP is in the Received, it shouldn't
t
"Mike Loiterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm getting a growing number of messages that appear to have been
> skipped by SA.
spamc skips large messages by default. That could be it.
SpamAssassin doesn't time itself out at all.
Daniel
-
that I can just add?
TIA
--
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have -
-happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ
-Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all-
-individuals! What if this weren't a hy
Hey guys,
i'm a newbie using spamassassin with Qmail. It works perfectly because
the job of the previous administrator was well done ... but nowadays
Sobig is generating a lot of bounce mails ... So i found this page
giving some rules to add to spamassassin:
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/VirusBou
Hello All
I get following errors when I run Spamd? Any ideas...
[admin admin]$ spamd
Could not create INET socket: Permission denied IO::Socket::INET: Permission
denied
Best Regards
O. TUNC ERESEN
ISP & Security Consultant
Mobile: (44)07785 363 481
17 OAK ROAD, BRACKLEY, NORTHANTS, UK, NN
49 matches
Mail list logo
