Hi Jim,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jim > I actually do use the -m switch, but on top of that I use a > concurrency limit on the spamc transport (I am using > Postfix). So Postfix will never launch more than "n" copies > of spamc, and will trickle the mails out of the queue when > necessary. Works well. What is your rule of thumb for the Postfix max process limit and the number of spamc max children? I have Postfix max process set to 5 but have not been throttling spamc. If the Postfix max process is set, why do you also set spamc max children? Is it necessary or are there potentential situations where it may be beneficial? Regards, Larry ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
