> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 04:32:47PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote: >> Anybody running spamc from procmail with sendmail is vulnerable to >> having >> their server overloaded because of uncontrolled concurancy of local >> deliveries - despite the options mentioned above, sendmail just doesn't >> have adequate control of local delivery concurancy. > > I actually do use the -m switch, but on top of that I use a concurrency > limit on the spamc transport (I am using Postfix). So Postfix will never > launch more than "n" copies of spamc, and will trickle the mails out of > the queue when necessary. Works well.
Yeah, pity sendmail doesn't (yet) have a way to limit the local delivery concurancy in an internal manner like that.... It would be more efficient that my method, as it would keep the server optimization (number of simultaneous spamd processes) just right during times of high load... Regards, Simon ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
