ver able to communicate via IPv6, relay to
Postfix B, if not, relay via IPv4 directly to dest. Mail-Server
Which solution should be the easies and which works? ;)
Greetz Daniel ;)
ent_domain,
reject_unauth_pipelining
smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_unknown_client_hostname
I Have to be sure that the mails must be arrive. Dont know why it get
droped by a 450 error.
greetz to all
--
Mit freundlichen Grü
> Once you have a well-thought-out and tested configuration, you should
> set:
> unknown_address_reject_code = 550
> unknown_client_reject_code = 550
> unknown_hostname_reject_code = 550
Can you tell me why? What does 550 mean?
And why is it importent to set it?
greetz
estination
syslog_name = postfix_mtaprod
transport_maps = hash:/etc/transport
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
What am I missing there? Any insight on this matter would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Daniel
Hi again.
On 06/06/17 12:11, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> I am gradually migrating the accounts of a server (let's say
> mail1.domain.com) to another server (let's say mail2.domain.com).
>
> In mail2.domain.com I'
On 06/06/17 17:44, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Daniel:
Hi, Wietse.
What an honor to receive this response from you :)
> Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
Here the signature is validated correctly with Thunderbird and Mutt.
Maybe the client does not have the public key (ID 14E61D3
Hi again, Wietse.
On 06/06/17 18:27, Daniel wrote:
>>>> I am gradually migrating the accounts of a server (let's say
>>>> mail1.domain.com) to another server (let's say mail2.domain.com).
>>>>
>>
ll the
mails, just the one that are sent using a client software, or a client
webmail...
Any help is appreciated!!!
Daniel
Hi,
Sorry for the informations missing. Here they are. This is running on a
vserver, which are behind a iptables firewall, and the local IPs are in the
range 10.0.32.0/24.
Daniel
Modification from the original master.cf
> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:36:07 -0600
> From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
> To: jackey...@hotmail.com; postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Your Email
>
> Daniel C wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry for the informations missin
vered directly through PHP (with mail()) is not delivered
twice...
I can't understand the logic behind all this...
Daniel
something else?
Daniel
---
Message #1
---
Received: from localhost (homer.mydomain.com [10.0.32.13])by
mail.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561804498EF
ail. I've included the
Amavis part in case it could help. As you can see, there's only one "Connect
from", which seems to mean that the client is only connecting once.
Daniel
---
Message #1
---
ge below?
User 207 is Postfix, the user that is running Postfix, Amavis and Courier-IMAP.
Daniel
aildir correctly, without
having to change the ownership of the directories to allow "group" or "other".
I hope I'm using a right strategy. ;)
Here's a complete copy of my master.cf file. I don't think I made a mistake in
there, but maybe I'm wron
What would be the best strategy? Create a new user and change postfix, amavis
and Courier-IMAP to use this user for message storing? Is it easy to adjust
configuration for this new user?
Also, I think this is not causing my duplicate email, right?
Daniel
> No, this is wrong, the "
py to itself at the same time...?
Daniel
> Daniel C a écrit :
>> What would be the best strategy? Create a new user and change postfix,
>> amavis and Courier-IMAP to use this user for message storing?
>
> No. do not the same user for different services:
>
> - keep the &
rks the message. Don't do that.
Thanks for the analysis. Look at the top of my mail for the uid/gid usage. I'm
really beginning to think there's a dual authentication somewhere. Or maybe a
misconfiguration in amavis...
Daniel
IMAP connection by copying
# a message to the INBOX.Outbox folder.
So when a mail was submitted via IMAP, mail was sent through SMTP, and a copy
was sent using Courier-IMAP.
Thanks everyone for the help, insight and explanation on how mails were
delivered.
Daniel
>> What use
9}
Is this supposed to be this way? Apparently GMX gets the email without
the local part and I think the map might apply later then the address
for the is generated/kept.
Anyway, is smtp_generic_maps a good way to solve this?
I'm using Postfix 2.5.1-2ubuntu1.2.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
http://daniel.hahler.de/
tched_extensions = canonical
>
> The default is:
>
> propagate_unmatched_extensions = canonical, virtual
But that would also include the whole of virtual delivery, no? (e.g.
to virtual_domains etc
Don't you think that smtp_generic_maps is a better approach?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
http://daniel.hahler.de/
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:09:17PM +0200, Daniel Hahler wrote:
>
>> > propagate_unmatched_extensions = canonical, virtual
I was referring to "propagate_unmatched_extensions = canonical" here.
>> But that
ne you use.
Is it an option for you to use policyd-weight or postfwd to reduce
mail lost and/or false-positives?
--
Daniel
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch as a smtpd_sender_restrictions
Daniel
originating would be greatly
appreciated.
Likewise, if anyone knows any other approach to stopping authenticated
users from
abusing the system.
Many thanks, Daniel Howard
ad of made up robot sign-ups
and hence loads of bounces.
It seems to me it would be useful to have a logwatch script that will
produce a report listing how many emails were sent by each authenticated
user. It would then be very obvious to an admin if a user's account was
being abused by spammers. I might try and write one and post it on here.
Thanks again,
Daniel Howard
> myhostname = apac3.apac.org.ni
In DNS: apac3.apac.org.ni = 165.98.119.11
BUT
165.98.119.11 != apac3.apac.org.ni
165.98.119.11 == pppleon11.ibw.com.ni.
s not provide much detail about your specific scenario.
Best Regards
Daniel Ryslink
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Patric Falinder wrote:
Thats just it, I'm not even sure if I have configured it right and I'm starting
to think there is something wrong with it cause I'm not 100% sure how
sasl w
but I'm not sure what. I seem to recall
that members of the postfix-users list typically want the output of postconf or
something similar, but I forget exactly what. Let me know, and I'll send it.
Thanks for any assistance you can provide.
Daniel
ct value
without a problem... So it really seems like a postfix problem.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
--
Daniel Gomes (SysAdmin)
dgo...@ipfn.ist.utl.pt
Ext. 3487 - 218419487
Instituto de Plasmas e usão Nuclear
Instituto Superior Técnico - UTL
Av. Rovisco Pais - 1049-001 Lisboa - Portugal
Hi all.
I posted this the other day but got no replies, on or off list. I'm really
hoping someone might have an idea of what I can do here. I've been looking
into things for the last couple days and have not made any progress.
Thanks.
Daniel
---
Today I think I am trying to do
On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:40, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Daniel L'Hommedieu:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I posted this the other day but got no replies, on or off list.
>> I'm really hoping someone might have an idea of what I can do
>> here. I've been looking into
On Mar 24, 2010, at 16:26, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Daniel L'Hommedieu:
>> On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:40, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Daniel L'Hommedieu:
>>>> Hi all.
>>>>
>>>> I posted this the other day but got no replies, on or off list.
On Mar 24, 2010, at 17:14, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Daniel L'Hommedieu:
>>> If all you want is treat anything.example.com as example.com, use:
>>>
>>> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>>> mydestination = localhost example.com pcre:/etc/postfix/mydestination.p
7;t know if postfix has a similar feature, but if it does, that's what I'd
implement.
Daniel
ured.
>
> Blocking forged mails from real_u...@domain to real_u...@domain is harder, as
> if any of your users use SMTP servers other than your own then it's very hard
> to distinguish between that and forgeries.
Mark,
I find that using the Zen spamhaus list does a very good job at blocking mail
from real_u...@example.com, for my domains example.com.
Daniel
.1.el5_2." It's interesting that both of these Linux versions
offer a version of postfix that is so old...
Maybe I need to look into maintaining postfix manually...
Daniel
On Mar 28, 2010, at 19:28, Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:51:27 -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu
> articulated:
>
>> After seeing this comment, I decided to see what versions of postfix
>> I have installed. The RPM available for both CentOS 5 and RHEL5 is
>>
y)
I have explicitly (for sure) stated in main.cf:
maximal_queue_lifetime = 5d
What's wrong? Is the queue lifetime valid only for locally delivered mail?
--
Daniel Cizinsky at lists
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 03:40:04PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>> Daniel Cizinsky at lists
>
>
> This is expected behavior. Mail released from hold with "postsuper -H"
> always gets at least one chance to be delivered regardless of its age.
Thanks a lot!
But IMHO it
sk the admins of said relayhost to help troubleshoot your
> problem with delivery to gmail. This is not a Postfix issue.
Jeff,
It's just what Sahil said. Your ISP is blocking outbound SMTP, at least to
gmail, so you will only be able relay through your ISP.
Daniel
On Apr 6, 2010, at 08:30, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:41:31 -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu
> articulated:
>
>> On Apr 5, 2010, at 23:51, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010, Jeff Lacki wrote:
>>>> I havent touched the config in a few weeks
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 05:12:52PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> Move it to the "maildrop" queue of a different Postfix queue (instance)
> whose queue directory is on the same file-system, and main.cf contains
>
> content_filter = error:...
Thanks a lot! That wo
from my domain '
mydomain.univ.edu' and have them redirected from my new Postfix server to
domain 'univ.edu'. How could I make that work?
Thank you for your help,
Daniel
p://groups.google.com/groups/unlock?hl=en&_done=/group/list.postfix.users/browse_thread/thread/59e45e627b99c294%3Fhl%3Den&msg=82d2317b674054fd>@mydomain.com>,
relay=local, delay=0.06, delays=0.04/0/0/0.01, dsn=5.1.1,
status=bounced (unknown user: "student1")
Daniel
Brian,
On 8/18/2010 2:17 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 2:05 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Hello,
I have moved from Sendmail to Postfix and eliminated Student email
accounts and kept staff accounts.
I'm using 'virtual_alias_maps" to forward old student email a
On 8/18/2010 4:16 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 3:50 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Brian,
On 8/18/2010 2:17 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 2:05 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Hello,
I have moved from Sendmail to Postfix and eliminated Student email
On 8/19/2010 2:33 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/19/2010 2:21 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
On 8/18/2010 4:16 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 3:50 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Brian,
On 8/18/2010 2:17 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 2:05 PM
to=, relay=local, delay=0.05, delays=0.05/0/0/0.01,
dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to mailbox)
Aug 26 10:17:01 mail postfix/local[17242]: 6A759BF109A:
to=, relay=local, delay=0.06, delays=0.05/0/0/0.01,
dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command: /usr/bin/vacation user1)
Thank you,
Daniel
So what is the alternative to vacation for Postfix?
Thanks,
Daniel
On 8/26/2010 10:48 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Daniel Prieto:
Is there a substitute 'vacation' feature from Sendmail for Postfix for
all my users? Is Postfix.admin the best bet?
I compiled vacation on my linux box and
lf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Daniel Prieto:
So what is the alternative to vacation for Postfix?
Huh? Why alternative? The "normal" vacation works just fine.
Just read the manpage, there are options to answer to every mail etc.
On 8/26/2010 11:26 AM, Udo Rader wrote:
On 08/26/2010 04:39 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Hello,
Got some error in my logs below:
Aug 25 21:22:16 mail local[29944]: fatal: execvp /usr/bin/vacation: No
such file or directory
Aug 25 21:22:16 mail postfix/local[29867]: EF319BF1087:
to=, relay
vacation reply message.
Daniel
On 8/27/2010 3:53 AM, Simon Waters wrote:
On Thursday 26 August 2010 21:48:06 Daniel Prieto wrote:
delays=0.04/0/0/0.02, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command:
/usr/bin/vacation testuser)
I suspect at this point it ceases to be a "postfix"
when
> connections to the proxy fail. Perhaps something along the lines of:
I second this: please add this improved logging.
I am facing a similar problem, and would like the error to show up in
the log.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
>
> Index: src/smtpd/smtpd_proxy.c
> --- src/smtpd/smtpd_p
I notice that postconf -n does not return my entries regarding the
slow transport and wonder if there's an error my setup.
My version is 2.8.0
The lines in main .cf are:
slow_destination_recipient_limit = 20
slow_destination_concurrency_limit = 2
The lines in master.cf:
slow unix -
if I migrate from postfix 2.2.7 to 2.8.0 postfix, what 's up with the mails
contained in the mails queues. Will they be recovered ?
Thanks in advance
Daniel Madaoui
Thanks for your response.
I read the RELEASES_NOTES and my upgrade was fine.
Cheers
Daniel Madaoui
--On 26 janvier 2011 07:04:11 -0500 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Daniel Madaoui:
if I migrate from postfix 2.2.7 to 2.8.0 postfix, what 's up with the
mails contained in the mails queues.
ance of getting something very wrong is just very
high, what with ensuring I have separate directories for all the right
things.
Someone set me straight?
Thanks,
-Daniel
ers I would think.
Anyway, thanks for the quick follow-up, resolved.
Daniel
On 1/30/2011 5:58 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/30/2011 3:31 PM, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
Hi,
I've recently started using postfix several weeks ago to run
my e-mail services. Using spamassassin/spamd,
greylists/SQLgre
ually do anything, like process untrusted input,
write or delete a file, or send a message.
More experienced admins, please confirm with acknowledgements and/or
refinements of this.
-Daniel
On 1/30/2011 9:32 PM, varad gupta wrote:
Thanx for all the replies - I now understand the reason for m
ad one has to look at throttling or
quota limits based on usage statistics (assuming overuse is the real
concern). If this were a standard need, I imagine there would be a
canned, comprehensive, iron-clad solution.
-Daniel
On 1/30/2011 10:16 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/30/2011 6:17 PM, Daniel Br
r, I have none. As for "external
sender address", are you referring to the envelope field, the Reply-to:
field, or the From: field? If either of the latter two, yes we agreed
earlier in the threat that that would have to be done with a cleanup filter.
Clarify?
-Daniel
On 1/31/2011
On 1/31/2011 7:24 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/30/2011 11:12 PM, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
Re: the From:/Reply-To cases: It seems one can write a better
regexp then given by mouss, such as including angle brackets
in the match field, or the full syntax
[the custom on this list is to bottom post
On 1/31/2011 3:40 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 03:32:20PM -0500, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
smtp.example.com:smtp inet n - n - -
smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
smtp.example.com:smtps inet n - n - -
smtpd
el like
Horde should live entirely in MySQL and only needs to communicate with
mail via its built-in IMAP client.
Thoughts?
-Daniel
On 1/31/2011 8:06 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 07:58:30PM -0500, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
I'm puzzling over the various discussions on using Courier's maildrop as
the local agent with Postfix. It plays well enough, but not...great. First
its error messages are
initial
replication.
I believe efficiency in a replicated setting will still be very high.
Mail is very heavily read-oriented for DB's: settings/user migration/new
users don't change that much but there are 10^n lookups a day.
-Daniel
It felt wrong to have to run the Cyrus authentication daemon and a
conceptually duplicate SQL config file just to help maildrop talk to my
database.
-Daniel
- n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=$submission_client_restrictions
-o syslog_name=postfix-submission
Is there some other part of the config I haven't discussed and need to, that is
making this work already for me?
-Daniel
" to our server
whether or not SpamAssassin et al. classifies it correctly and socks it
away, then can we do better?
More of a general question, no clear technical answer expected. Any
insights?
-Daniel
x27;%d' cannot be gleaned from the login string, which would
need to contain the '@'.
As Viktor said, focus on the translation layer, as Postfix is totally
neutral to how these maps work. Think like a programmer, not a
configurator*, and design the mapping function any way you want.
-Daniel
*You should never think like a configurator, because that's not even a word.
On 2/3/2011 4:44 AM, J4K wrote:
[snip]
I can attest to the awesomeness of Stan's pcre file. I run it on all 5
of our Postfix servers, and it catches a LOT of stuff. From my logs,
what it seems to do best is block zombie mailers on dynamic IPs.
And I updated to your latest version today, Stan. T
onse, possibly all at the same time. these tools generally
have too much power for the average user, not too little (which seems to
be your concern)
The thread is over I believe. If you like, start a new thread on how to
write a forwarding/vacationing $HOME/.mailfilter file properly.
-Daniel
On 2/4/2011 4:19 AM, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
On 2/4/2011 4:02 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
On 02/04/2011 08:36 AM, mouss wrote:
Le 03/02/2011 10:24, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
Hello
I'm migrating my mailhub.
on the fly I'm converting the mailboxes format from MBOX to Maildir
and I wonder
details of /dev
and /etc that have to be worked out? On a per-installation or
per-kernel-iteration basis? (Linux-biased perspective sought but others
welcome)
Finally, how does one use Postfix properly in the possessive?
"Postfix's, Postfixs', Postfix', and Postfixes" all look wrong.
-Daniel
On 2/8/2011 5:39 PM, GB GB wrote:
postconf -n -c /etc/postfix-hd will render the output I sent in the
earlier mail
regards,
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
GB GB:
here is the outputthe current version of postfix is 2.3.19
I asked for "postconf -n" output.
I di
ditions or failure
modes have occurred?
Bottom line: what's not working? What are users complaining about?
What's making you impatient? If I were snide, I'd say the server needs a
new bobblehead on top of it, and if I were cynical, I'd say you're
wanting to fiddle just to learn more. I try not to be, though. :-)
-Daniel
nd you can do nothing but contact the
remote site's postmaster. (By phone perhaps, depending on the level of
brokenness?!? :-))
-Daniel
uestion listed as a
current MX for domain.com? (Or is your webserver somehow accessing
stale MX...) But If the MX indeed is current, the receiving server is
probably just misconfigured and you can do nothing but contact the
remote site's postmaster. (By phone perhaps, depending on the level of
b
On 2/14/2011 8:51 AM, Georg Schönweger wrote:
[SNIP]
[REPOSTED FROM PERSONAL REPLY]
Hello Daniel,
thank you for this clear explanation! How can i figure out if the
receving mail server is listet as current MX for the recipient mail
address? It's not a big problem for us if the recipients
s I shutdown all mail
service temporarily and did a bulk transfer overnight (both servers were
IMAP/Maildir stores; your situation may be different but talk to the
cloud vendor.)
I'd be curious to know what you work out in any case.
-Daniel
y, you should not use @domain wild-cards and just write
a script to create those 6000 table entries for the old domain.
Let the computer do the work for you, it already has the data.
Wietse
Scott,
Are you fully table-driven? How about some SQL magic to build the
aliasing value dynamically, instead of a flat file?
-Daniel
oot 15590 0.0 0.0 6624 1868 ?Ss Feb07 0:33
/usr/libexec/postfix/master
-Daniel
e help
straighten me out, ideally in a more concise manner than my usual wordy
posts.
Thank you,
-Daniel
uns whatsoever relating to all those
IMAP transactions. Look into, for example, the dovecot quota module.
Personally, I find it irritatingly complex and rely on the law of
averages for my total mailbox store to be a reasonable size. Someday
I'll work it out.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota
-Daniel
those who create it.
-Daniel
On 2/18/2011 12:43 PM, Swapnil Bhaigude // Viva wrote:
How can I pass dkim and spf while sending mail campaigns?
Incase of any further queries, Please feel free to mail me or contact
me on the numbers provided below.
Thanks & Regards,
Swapnil A Bhaigude
Server
t to other ports (ftp/ssh),
traceroute, tcpdump, check routing firewall rules on all intermediate
hops, ipchains settings, incorrect local DNS settings...
-Daniel
the public internet domain
space. This private DNS server's zone file would be scriptable to query
(SNMP? MySQL tables?) your queue lengths of your MTAs and translate
these into MX priority values. If this is a good idea, it's probably
been done before, and you can copy an existing technique.
-Daniel
On 2/23/2011 1:58 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
No additional "failover" unless you want some hosts to receive mail
only when it fails to deliver to others. I prefer hot-hot.
Just vocabulary question, what is "hot-hot"?
-DB
ring this transition, so
there doesn't seem to be any rush. Perhaps someone can advocate for a
true service model in the meantime for things that *don't* change and
*should definitely* happen right at boot?
-Daniel
archives for "restricting outbound e-mail to be from the authenticated
user only" around 1/30/2011.
-Daniel
On 2/27/2011 1:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Thank you for your informations and very good documentation!
Has anybody an eye to systemd/postfix because systemd will
replace sysvinit/upstart in the upcoming Fedora 16 and
so also in future RHEL-Versions and maybe replace
upstart/sysvinit sooner or l
s tweaking will show up in the postfix log."
So just cut off the connection most ungraciously with Ctrl-] and quit
from the telnet prompt, or just Ctrl-C from the openssl client. Or,
graciously exit with a QUIT command (i.e. RFC 2821 4.1.1.10)
-Daniel
On 2/28/2011 11:17 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
jeffrey j donovan:
Thanks
I guess blew past that,.. okay so just kill the session and use
a client. I thought i would be able to then send or type a test
message like MAIL FROM: soandso
-j
You can (
openssl s_client -connect host:port
provid
# openssl s_client -connect smtp.example.com:465
220 smtp.example.com ESMTP Postfix
HELO example.com
250 example.com
AUTH login
334 VXNlcm5hbWU6 [the base64 encoding of "Username:"
ZGFuaWVsQGJhc2V6ZW4uY29t [base64 encoding of "dan...@basezen.com"]
334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6 [and of "Password:"]
[base64
On 2/28/2011 12:25 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
HELO example.com
Wrong. If you want to use extensions, you have to use EHLO.
250 example.com
AUTH login
MAIL FROM:
Wrong. See the RFC, no space after ":".
RCPT TO:
See above.
This i
fy anything as "meeeh" rather than accept/reject,
but from a few hundred samples (admittedly, quite small), this is a 100%
mass-marketing-positive classifier.
-Daniel
ut no success.
--
Eero
Should go without saying that you need to post all relevant
configuration file excerpts from your latest effort for further help
(with redactions for privacy), and errors from the log if any, yes?
-Daniel
entirely different scenario? Some kind of
*outgoing* relay issue?
-Daniel
etse
A cheers from this corner as well. A light just went on. Did not even
realize until now the referent was an old fashioned, jailbroken blue-box
Linksys router. Talk about consolidation! "Oh, that's your home router?
-- No, corporate mailhub." Please, post a detailed blog and link to it
when you're done!
-Daniel
1 - 100 of 540 matches
Mail list logo
