The nature of these unrelated e-mails reflects the likely spammy
attitude of your company which no doubt sends out millions daily.
As far as I'm concerned, you've stumbled onto your enemies. People on
this list are concerned with preventing spam because it clogs the
Internet, not those who create it.
-Daniel
On 2/18/2011 12:43 PM, Swapnil Bhaigude // Viva wrote:
How can I pass dkim and spf while sending mail campaigns?
Incase of any further queries, Please feel free to mail me or contact
me on the numbers provided below.
Thanks & Regards,
Swapnil A Bhaigude
Server Administrator
Viva Infomedia Pvt. Ltd.
242, Oshiwara Industrial Centre,
Opp. Oshiwara Bus Depot, New Link Road,
Goregaon West, Mumbai 400104.
Direct: +91.22.4293 0162
Board: +91.22.4293 0100
Email: swap...@vivaconnect.in <mailto:avin...@vivaconnect.in>
Web: www.vivaconnect.in <http://www.vivaconnect.in/>
Viva Infomedia: Awarded as Best SME (E-Commerce) at CNBC Emerging
India Awards 2009
Disclaimer:
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies and the original
message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure,dissemination,
forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in
reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The recipient acknowledges that Viva Infomedia Pvt.Ltd. or its
subsidiaries and associated companies are unable to exercise control
or ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the
information contained in e-mail transmissions and further acknowledges
that any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender and no binding nature of the message shall be implied or
assumed unless the sender does so expressly with due authority of Viva
Infomedia Pvt.Ltd. Before opening any attachments please check them
for viruses and defects.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Reindl Harald
<h.rei...@thelounge.net <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote:
Am 17.02.2011 08:43, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net
<mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>>:
>
>>> so orange.stuon.com <http://orange.stuon.com> told
antispam.stuon.com <http://antispam.stuon.com>: 550 5.1.1 ...
>>> and
>>> antispam.stuon.com <http://antispam.stuon.com> converted this
to 450 4.1.1 ...
>>> thus your postfix got a 450.
>>>
>>> so the problem is on antispam.stuon.com
<http://antispam.stuon.com>
>>
>> *argh*
>>
>> i looked only at the end of the line :-(
>> so they have a poor setup
>
> That's a very commonplace error
are they all drunken out there?
a few minutes ago i did get the bounce from our server
because we are bouncing after 3 days instead of five
unbelieveable....
seems my mail to their hostmaster reached someone after
greylisting :-)
[root@mail:~]$ cat maillog | grep stuonline.at <http://stuonline.at>
Feb 17 00:05:53 mail postfix/smtp[6807]: EA7FCC5:
to=<hostmas...@stuonline.at <mailto:hostmas...@stuonline.at>>,
relay=antispam.stuon.com
<http://antispam.stuon.com>[82.96.70.21]:25, delay=0.27,
delays=0.08/0/0.15/0.03, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred (host
antispam.stuon.com <http://antispam.stuon.com>[82.96.70.21] said:
450 4.7.1 <hostmas...@stuonline.at
<mailto:hostmas...@stuonline.at>>: Recipient address rejected: Policy
Rejection- Please try later. (in reply to RCPT TO command))
Feb 17 00:21:46 mail postfix/smtp[6997]: EA7FCC5:
to=<hostmas...@stuonline.at <mailto:hostmas...@stuonline.at>>,
relay=antispam.stuon.com
<http://antispam.stuon.com>[82.96.70.21]:25, delay=953,
delays=942/0.02/0.06/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok,
id=13195-04, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
5DD2C493C002)
