ace... :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
STM32Primer2. If desired I can also perform similar low-level
hardware dumps done with STM32Primer1 for full protocol comparision
(if still anything is unknown for Primer1).
Here are the files:
http://files.tomek.cedro.info/electronics/arm/cortex-m3/stm32/
Best regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 6:04 AM, somboon sopee wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:29 AM, CeDeROM wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> If anyone is interested to work on the SWJ/RLink with STM32Primer2,
>> here goes the pinouts:
>> http://www.tomek.cedro.info/content
Hello!
If anyone is interested to work on the SWJ/RLink with STM32Primer2,
here goes the pinouts:
http://www.tomek.cedro.info/content/view/236/1/lang,en/
Best regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development
; SWD "interfaces".
> And For AVR ISP, SPI "interface" support will be needed.
> So this is the framework for managing all these "interfaces".
Oh yes, SPI interface would be very helpful also for FPGA devices
programming, maybe I2C should be also im
(if needed) :-) I wonder also about speed of this cable - is there a
change to be faster than FT2232H based interface?
Best regards!
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-developme
details at:
http://www.kamami.pl/dl/stm8sdiscovery.pdf
Regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
ently I dont get to other tasks until
those are finished. But there could be a support for parallel work on
other cables (I can't manage all this myself in sensible time) - and
here I can help in dumping transfers at physical layer :-)
Best regards! :-)
Tomek Cedro
Best regards,
Tomek
--
Ce
interface, but
I dont have one (is it expensive, maybe Ill get one?).
Best regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
ds,
Tomek Cedro
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
s to sort/read them out :\
Maybe there is some kind of web-interface to the mailing list?
Regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.d
o I cannot perform this task :-(
Best regards!
Tomek
ps/2: Does anybody know how to reply to a message hidden in a
plaintext-digest as in this situation? ;P
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing l
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:10 AM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010, CeDeROM wrote:
>> > But also ... don't all those "STM32Primer" boards require
>> > SWD support? OpenOCD doesn't yet support that.
>>
>> Partially - the
For those interested - status of the port can be verified online at:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=143967
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https
Hello David!
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:08 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010, CeDeROM wrote:
>> Hello! I have some problems with running STM32Primer1 and the
>> 0.4.0-rc2 on FreeBSD :-(
>>
>> %openocd -f interface/rlink.cfg -f board/stm32f10x
ACK=OK/FAULT in JTAG-DP transaction
Timeout (1000ms) waiting for ACK=OK/FAULT in JTAG-DP transaction
(...)
Best regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
h
zy should know: cd /usr/ports; make quicksearch key="openocd" hehehe :-)
Best regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios
in official port :-)
> Thanks a lot for the helps.
You are most welcome and thank you for testing on FreeBSD! You see -
it was even not a half of a day to get a brand new working and
functional operating system hahaha! ;P :-)
Best regards! :-)
Tomek Cedro
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:35 AM, CeDeROM wrote:
>
>> If you want to test the latest 0.4.0-rc2 source code, please download
>> this unapproved port package and uncompress it into /usr/ports/devel:
>> http://file
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:35 AM, CeDeROM wrote:
>> Xiao, the port is a some kind of a program plug into a FreeBSD system
>> - for a program to work on a FreeBSD it must have its own Port, also
>> any change in the pro
0-RC2 and in this case the ports is
already prepared) - I have to consult the system developers...
Best regards,
Tomek Cedro
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berl
but I will try to find the solution.
So is it sensible/worth to preape a port for this purpose, or assume
that developer use git anyway?
Best regards,
Tomek Cedro
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
oblem with the parse of the config files or misleading device
names (ie. linux eth0+eth1 vs bsd nfe0+rl0). Because the "main tree"
here is a Port System, and it is separated from a system core, there
is no "intergrating into a main tree" that could make system
inconsistent, and
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:49 PM, CeDeROM wrote:
>
>> Xorg will autoconfigure though HAL and DBUS so you should have these
>> installed. If you install gnome2 (pkg_add -r gnome2 xorg) it will
>> download and install
Hello Xiao! :-)
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:38 AM, CeDeROM wrote:
>
> I have now a working 8.0-Release system, only console though. X
> is kind of working, but no keyboard and mouse, so not really
> useful, tried the vesa
resolve this issue :-)
Best regads,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
- it builds of-the-box! :-)
The define "__FreeBSD__" allows compilation without additional define
flag which is correct ofcourse - some minutes ago I made the same
mistake twice :\
Now I try to install and see what happens =)
Best regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, ht
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:32 AM, CeDeROM wrote:
> Hello David!
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:11 AM, David Brownell wrote:
>>> I finally got for better testing if 0.4.0-RC1, there are no big issues
>>> as for now, however I have some remarks:
>>
>> Good
of the USB/Ethernet stuff... but I still remember
playing with LEDs on Amiga's parallel port ~15 years ago hahah :-)
> A loadFile() call sounds more like a Win32-ism than something
> a Real Operating System would use. ;)
Im not sure, but remember this thing caused troubles bef
ibs/libopenocd.a(libserver_la-httpd.o)(.text+0x790): In function `ahc_echo':
: undefined reference to `loadFile'
gmake[4]: *** [openocd] Error 1
That's it for now - the skeleton for a new release is ready, also for
RC2, but please, if possible avoid "-" mark before "RC&
r that, except writing your own
code CMSIS and StdPeriph_Lib conformant? Maybe you have already a
template/skeleton for STM32 projects on Unix? :-)
Best regards,
Tomek Cedro
--
CeDeROM, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing l
cd -c erasemem" from a Makefile.
Please advise,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
help with RLink support for
> those boards.
Sure thing! I have even one interesting toy to play with rlink :-P
Best rehards! :-)
Tomek
[1]
http://urjtag.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/urjtag/tags/URJTAG_0_10/web/htdocs/book/_jtag_commands.html
[2] http://www.stm32circle.com/
--
CeDeR
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> No. I think work might start in 0.5 timeframe, but a first release is
> probably 0.6/7'ish.
>
> Unless someone steps up and does some amazing work that is...
I see, thank you Øyvind! :-)
Best regards,
Tomek
be done by credit
card, and the order is in your home next day (UPS for 5EUR)! :-)
Best regards :-)
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:46 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Sunday 10 January 2010, CeDeROM wrote:
>> What will be next step after rc1 - a release or some short rc2?
>
> Not sure yet. I sent a post yesterday about RC1 status, and
> merging that FreeBSD buildfix knocks off
- no time right now sorry I
will be able to test it within few days :-( :-( :-( - but if Steve and
Robert use it well then it should be fine..? :-)
What will be next step after rc1 - a release or some short rc2?
Best regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
ssues, so I considered it would be better to stay with older but more
stable release and wait for a 0.4.0. Happily 0.4.0 will be out in a
few days and it will go straight to the port tree :-)
Currently I have some project to be done within a days with a STM32
device, and I got bran
c0? If rc0 why it is named 0.3.0? :-(
Regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
Libftdi is also important on systems that have no libtd2xx (like BSD)
and have no problems with licensing :-)
And... when the serial engine would have to be used - it is not
lawyers who add them to the libftdi.
Regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, http://www.tome
nditional include basing on WIN32 define (it is removes in cvs
version already).
I did not modify other sources as I did not have enough time, but I
can check it out soon :-)
Can You please tell me all dependencies OpenOCD is/will be based on?
Regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, http://www.tomek.c
Hello Zach!
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Zach Welch wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 09:22 +0200, CeDeROM wrote:
>> Hello world!
>>
>> OpenOCD 0.1.0 is now available on FreeBSD platform :-)
>> Not all cables are available though - most of USB dongles work, these
&g
://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135094
Is it already known when 0.2.0 will come to the light?
Best regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de
looking with oscilloscope on nTRST and nSRST lines driven by
OpenOCD, they periodicaly turns low and high.
What is exact timing of signals these lines gets low and high (what
moment/what function)?
Is there any good and commonly available document on JTAG timing?
Regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, http
44 matches
Mail list logo
