My understanding is that they are launching using commercial CDNs. Highly
likely those CDNs don't know what their traffic share will be like just yet.
The ASN you're seeing pop up is a mid tier, not for delivery.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:38 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> but hey... they're getting
Yes.
Best Regards,
-Dave
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 1:24 PM -0400, "Weir, Colin"
wrote:
Is Wednesday night the only social?
--
Colin Weir
Engineer, Quality of Experience, Comcast Cable
Desk: 215-286-5406
Cell: 215-279-1733
From: NANOG on be
Just to clarify based on offline messages:
There are still the usual after-Plenary programs such as Peering Personals,
Beer & Gear, etc.. There are just no off-site socials aside from Wednesday
evening. The agenda is up to date.
-Dave
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 1:47 PM -0400, "Da
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Aled Morris wrote:
>
>
> Me too and I was confused about what the point of it was.
>
> I had always assumed the customers of those IXs he singled out were
> generally happy with the service they were getting and the money they are
> paying.
>
> Is Dave trying to s
General, with the four being used as varying examples. I could have included US
IXP's, but almost none publish their prices and the ones that do only started
recently, so the comparison wasn't worthwhile.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:39 AM -0500, "Nick Hilliard" wrote:
I hope you'll excuse the aggressive snipping, as I wanted to try to address
as many of your points without repeating myself as possible.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Dave Temkin wrote:
>
> With respect to all parties involved in
Hi Nurani,
Much of what you've asked me below is answered up-thread, so I'm not going
to rehash it for the sanity of the others following this discussion. I have
snipped what hasn't been.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>
>
> I take your point about the Netnod fees (eve
A key point:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
I have studied Netnod extensively because we want to become members
>
You meant a customer, but because of a lack of transparency (and great
marketing) amongst some IXPs, it's very easy to conflate member-mutual
IXPs, commerci
It seems as though most subtlety is lost on this crowd, or perhaps there's
just a language barrier.
I'm saying that if you were to, for example, look at the homepage of
https://www.peering-forum.eu and see the "Hosts" block, you might think
"There are four similarly named IXPs are all similar orga
Starting to see people like Telehouse move into the monthly XC market, so
one might think we're at the precipice of the slippery slope.
And with Equinix buying Telecity, how long until we see US-style XCs in
Europe?
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Brandon Ross wrote:
>
>
> Value based pricing is all the rage these days, which is why they charge
> you so much for cross connects.
Exactly. Not that I don't like free cross connects (they're the bees knees,
in fact), but at the end of the day, an existing col
If you look at companies that have foundered due to failure to innovate, most
of the time it's because they were too focused on what made them money then,
not what was going to make them money 5 years from then.
And networks don't track very well to Moore's law...
_
We (Netflix) are investigating this now.
-Dave
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 12:44 PM -0500, "Velocity Lists"
wrote:
We have seen it as well.
In our cases it is all TCP DNS traffic as well.
Velocity Online
850-205-4638
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Eamon Bauman
wrote:
> We're ra
:
-
Will Charnock - 3 years
-
Patrick Gilmore - 3 years
The officers elected and committee liaisons are:
-
Chair - Dave Temkin
-
Vice Chair - Ryan Donnelly
-
Treasurer - Will Charnock
-
Secretary - Betty Burke
-
Communications Committee Liaison - Jezzibell
back provided. We
decided that it was in the best interests of the organization to move
forward with these fee increases immediately and to programatically
consider our fees on an annual basis.
For the NANOG Board of Directors,
Dave Temkin
Chair
___
N
Hi Sam,
As you may have noticed, Netflix no longer uses Cogent as a transit
provider. You will see all of your transit traffic from us traverse Level3.
We are happy to try to work with you to find the best way to deliver your
traffic. Please reach out to peer...@netflix.com and the team will try
change the makeup
of the Election Committee. In past elections, it was made up of two
non-conflicted board members and the Executive Director. Going forward, two
board members will be joined by 3 NANOG members, to be selected by the
seated board.
Best Regards,
-Dave Temkin
Chair, NANOG Board of
The Peering Personals has been shelved while we try to figure out a better
option.
There was no peering content submitted to the Program Committee that justified
a separate track, and so they chose to include the content in the general
session throughout the program.
Regards,
-Dave
On Feb 6,
Hi Bob,
This was inadvertent and we will bring this back for NANOG 70.
Regards,
-Dave
On Feb 6, 2017, 6:58 PM -0500, Bob Evans , wrote:
> I suggest in the future NOT to get rid of something because a new method
> is attempted. I.E nanog had a nice method of identifying potential and
> existing
a *silent*
> rolling slide show on a screen, with 1-slide per submitter,
> for peering news items or general peering requests...
>
> Cheaper... quieter... shorter... But having all the people
> in the same room at the same time for the same purpose, usually
> pretty useful.
following to the Ad-Hoc NANOG On The Road Committee:
Chair: Steve Feldman
Additional Members: Mohit Lad, Jeff Ringwelski, and Ryan Landry
In the coming weeks, the new Program Committee will hold its first meeting
and select a Chair and a Vice-Chair.
Sincerely,
Dave Temkin
Chair, NANOG Board of
FWIW (reviving an old thread)-
Putting an OCA with bypass through the CGN with RFC1918 space will actually
work just fine. We (Netflix) don't formally support it because of the vast
number of non-standard CGN implementations out there, but if your clients
are in RFC1918 space and the next hop rout
>
> On Nov 25, 2018, at 10:47 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:
>
> FWIW (reviving an old thread)-
>
> Putting an OCA with bypass through the CGN with RFC1918 space will
> actually work just fine. We (Netflix) don't formally support it because of
> the vast number of non-standar
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:48 AM Grant Taylor via NANOG
wrote:
> On 11/25/2018 09:47 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:
> > Putting an OCA with bypass through the CGN with RFC1918 space will
> > actually work just fine. We (Netflix) don't formally support it because
> > of the vast
See this post for more info:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r32136909-Has-Vz-disabled-TTL-propagation
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 3:09 PM Nick Zurku wrote:
> Can anyone from Verizon take a look at this behavior for us?
>
>
> We’re having multiple Verizon FiOS users in the NYC/NJ area appear to
>
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 11:33 AM Naslund, Steve
wrote:
> They shouldn’t need OOB to operate existing lambdas just to configure new
> ones. One possibility is that the management interface also handles master
> timing which would be a really bad idea but possible (should be redundant
> and it sho
Yes, frankly, it doesn't cost us (NANOG) anything - the sponsors like to do
it for the "cool" factor, and so long as it's not an undue burden on us,
they can throw as much bandwidth at us as they'd like.
-Dave
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 4:02 PM, James Breeden wrote:
> Yeah, I was wondering about th
aggressively pursue any abuse of NANOG's attendee information, trademarks,
and mailing list.
-Dave Temkin
Chair, NANOG Board of Directors
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Dave Temkin wrote:
>
> This is highly inaccurate. The PC and Board have done everything in our
>> power to keep sponsorship out of the program. Yes, Beer & Gear looks like
>> a
>> NASCAR rac
NANOG-Bylaws-October2016.pdf>
or follow the links to the Board and Committee pages from the General 2017
NANOG Elections Page <https://www.nanog.org/elections/2017/general>.
Best regards,
Dave Temkin
On behalf of the NANOG Board of Directors
below.
Best Regards,
-Dave Temkin, for the NANOG Board of Directors
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:
> Hello NANOGers!
>
> We are once again approaching the annual NANOG election
> <http://nanog.org/elections/2017/general> and appointment time. Board
> candida
o the group. You are free to vote whomever you choose.
Best Regards,
-Dave
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Robert Brockway
wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, Dave Temkin wrote:
>
> Hi NANOG Community,
>>
>> Nominations are rapidly coming to a close - September 8th is the last
and the torch over to the next guard, and that's the root of my
diversity screed. If we try to be everything to everyone, we end up as
nothing to no one (or worse, ITW). The board has been nothing but receptive
towards ideas on how to make these meetings more valuable to long time and
first time attendees alike.
-Dave Temkin
NANOG Board Chair
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> >> On Sep 10, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote:
> >> I point specifically to the opening talk at Bellevue where there were
> wackily photoshop'd pictures of NANOG star heavy-hitters.
> >> Had I been a first-time attendee, I would've
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > So how do we fix it?
>
> this is most strongly an american disease. nanog has encouraged and
> supported a frat boy ego parade and beauty contest. try the ietf
> nomcomm approach, but with zero white boys on the nomcomm.
>
>
Love the idea,
Sean - I think I speak for all of us when I say thank you very much for
these updates! The concise nature of them is super helpful.
-Dave
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> Disclosure note: AT&T and Comcast public relations folks have been sending
> information about what
Talks about GSRs and Sup720's, but still relevant today.
https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog39/presentations/Scholl.pdf
-Dave
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:05 AM, BRAD RAYMO wrote:
> Its up to you and how you want to manage your sessions. Some networks
> require it, some prefer it but do not requ
I appreciate your tenacity!
SSI = Streaming Services Inc., always wholly owned by Netflix.
We had three ASNs at one point. We needed a fourth to do a migration and the
ASN gods smiled down on us and gave us 2906 out of a newly released pool of
unallocated ASNs, back in 2011.
That ASN birthed o
New bill out today as part of a larger set of broadband infrastructure
bills, the result of some of the NANOG community's conversations with House
staffers (and likely other 3rd parties influence):
H.R. , “Promoting Exchanges for Enhanced Routing of Information So
Networks are Great (PEERING)
David Freedman wrote:
e.
We will need to set up a L2TPV3 tunnel to their old location (single
homed, no BGP on that side). Upon initial reading of Cisco docs to do
this, we will need a routable IP on a loopback interface for starters.
I'm pretty sure this is just a recommendation base
Jeff Wheeler wrote:
1) Comcast believes they can exact a great deal of revenue from
content networks. For this to be comparable to their captive
customers, per-megabit rates must be reminiscent of pre-Level3 days,
when $30/Mb was a bargain. This would spell bad news for Netflix. Of
course, si
Jeff Wheeler wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:
I disagree. Even at $1/Mbit and 6Tbit of traffic (they do more), that's
still $72M/year in revenue that they weren't recognizing before. Given that
that traffic was actually *costing* them money to abs
George Bonser wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Wheeler [mailto:j...@inconcepts.biz]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 1:22 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:
I do. And yes
George Bonser wrote:
What I think George's
comment
does not completely appreciate is that (ideally) cities are imposing
such requirements at the behest of and for the benefit of the (local)
public, whereas private constraints on local access are (by design)
motivated by profit.
I wasn't re
George Bonser wrote:
They do already. It's called HBO, Showtime, HDNet Sports, etc. -
they
get charged per eyeball for those networks, and so they pass the
charge
on per eyeball to the customer.
Nothing is new here.
The municipality charges the cable company per HBO
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
BTW, they rejected my very nice comment on their blog asking if they
would be willing to share the graphs of their transit provider
interfaces (which are NOT peering relationships, and not under NDA) to
back up their claims that the published graphs are false, so
Hi Richard,
You may be confusing Idaho for Portland, but either way we are constantly
adding new POPs and Portland is a great example of us bearing the cost that
ISPs were bearing before to haul traffic from Seattle or San Jose. I would
consider that a great success.
Regarding Comcast in SF, they
We've never been asked to POP that location. If I can, I will, just as my
team has POPed 15+ other locations this year alone.
Brett doesn't seem interested in finding a solution. He's sent dozens of
harassing emails demanding payment and nothing else. I've offered to speak
to him directly but he h
On Monday, July 14, 2014, Matthew Petach wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Brett Glass > wrote:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > If Netflix tries to use its market power to harm ISPs, or to smear
> > us via nasty on-screen messages as it has been smearing Verizon, ISPs
> have
> > no choice but to rea
The box doesn't even download 10% of the whole catalog and churns less than
1% a day.
Obviously our demand curve is proprietary information, but I can assure you
that a lot of people - engineers, mathematicians, etc. have looked at and
improved the algorithm - but we are still constantly working t
We inquired about space & power in the location that Brett mentions
(Level3) as well as the Coresite location. We were told there was no power
to be had in either building, hence we went for the third option. We have
transport options available back to both should we need it.
That said, that shows
ation can be found about how the NANOG community governs itself here:
http://www.nanog.org/governance/ .
Thanks,
-Dave Temkin
s and Draft Slides Due: December 5th, 2011
Final Slides Due: December 19th, 2011
The NANOG Program Committee intends on having a draft program published by December 20th, 2011 and the final
agenda published by January 16, 2012.
---
Thanks,
-Dave Temkin
(for the NANOG Program Comm
Please note that the Early Bird registration for NANOG54 expires on Sunday, 12/4. Register now and save $75
off the regular registration fee!
Also, as a reminder, the Call for Presentations is still open! Have something that you think is relevant to
the NANOG community and would like to have
Feel free to contact peering@netflixcom - we're happy to provide you with delivery statistics for
traffic terminating on your network.
Regards,
-Dave Temkin
Netflix
On 12/7/11 8:57 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:
Yeah, that's an interesting one. We currently utilize netflow for this, but you
on Monday at 9:30AM
Regular registration ends on 01/29/2012 and late registration starts on 01/30/2012. Save $75 and register
today!
Thanks to our host, Telx, for bringing us to sunny San Diego. We are all set
to have a great meeting!
-Dave Temkin
NANOG PC Chair
for
Network Operators. Both tutorials will be available later for review.
You may see all streaming options at http://www.nanog.org/streaming.php
-Dave Temkin
For the NANOG Program Committee
___
NANOG-announce mailing list
nanog-annou...@nanog.org
-2012
Final Agenda Published: 15-May-2012
Please submit your materials to http://pc.nanog.org
Looking forward to seeing everyone in San Diego.
-Dave Temkin
(Chair, NANOG Program Committee)
___
NANOG-a
All,
A reminder as per below - abstracts are due today, and we would like to ask for
slides by April 9th.
Best Regards,
-Dave Temkin
On 2/20/12 5:43 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:
NANOG Community,
After an awesome meeting in San Diego, we're already starting to get ready for NANOG
ons/meeting.asp#question2>**
The NANOG Program Committee is proud of the program that we have assembled for Vancouver and we are looking
forward to welcoming everyone to this amazing venue.
*Regards,
-Dave Temkin
For the NANOG Program Committee
Just to close the loop on this - UltraDNS has an issue with CNAMEs and their Directional DNS service. We
(Netflix) have applied a workaround and it appears stable.
-Dave
On 6/6/12 8:05 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
I started monitoring IPv6 access to www.netflix.com after seeing this
posting
(http://
engineers, and
architects.
Please see below for the full program description.
Regards,
-Dave Temkin, for the NANOG Board of Directors
NANOG College Immersion Program
Summary:
NANOG is committed to ensuring next generation of networking professionals
have an opportunity become part of the o
essor be
> required to participate or can students apply by on their own?
>
> -Colin
> On Sep 26, 2014 10:26 AM, "Dave Temkin" wrote:
>
>> I'm excited to announce that for NANOG 63 in San Antonio that we will
>> begin
>> the NANOG College Immersion Program
Ressurecting this thread: GIGLINX is still at it.
They contacted me on an email that was only ever used for registering an
ASN with ARIN.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:14 PM, John Curran wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Barry Shein wrote:
>
> > The usual method is to insert "ringers" which wo
Hi all,
FL-IX has started issuing LOAs for both 36 NE 2nd Street and NOTA in Miami.
If you have a network that peers at either location, we'd love to have you
as a member. We've committed to keeping the IX platform free for 3 years
(you bring the cross connect; we have pre-negotiated deals for in
Quite simple - Verizon doesn't offer BGP or any other type of custom
service over FIOS. No Layer 2, no non-VZ Layer 3, etc... You get the IP
space you pay for from them (per IP).
-Dave
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Dennis Burgess
wrote:
> Got a customer that needs a /25 block routed to him,
Our (Netflix) call center has been trained on how to handle calls for false
positive issues with proxy/VPNs. If you don't achieve an acceptable result,
please feel free to reach out - but believe it or not, they are the best
ones to handle.
-Dave
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:36 AM, chris wrote:
>
Daniel,
I don't see any emails from *.nodesdirect aside from a peering request from
a long time ago. Feel free to email me directly with the IP ranges in
question and I'll make sure they get looked at.
-Dave
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Daniel Stephens
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone from N
Seems like an odd waste of resources; what if Google, Akamai, Netflix, and
anyone else who wanted caches wanted IPs in that block? The IX would be out
of address space pretty quickly, forcing a majority of users to re-number
because of a small number of other users.
-Dave
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at
Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Joe Greco wrote:
It's not the initial assignment fee that's really an impediment, it's
moving from a model where the address space is free (or nearly so) to
a model where you're paying a significant annual fee for the space.
We'd be doing IPv6 here if not for the a
Alexander Harrowell wrote:
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 00:27:55 Joe Greco wrote:
Assuming that the existence of an infected PC in the mix translates to
some sort of inability to make a 911 call correctly is, however, simply
irresponsible, and at some point, is probably asking for trouble.
Randy Epstein wrote:
No need for me to repeat what Mike has posted. I agree 100% with him on all
fronts. Mike and his team have gone out of their way to promote and support
IPv6 from the very beginning and I think everyone knows this. In the past,
I had some differences with Mike over legacy p
Marco Hogewoning wrote:
Cogent: You are absolutely insane. You are doing nothing but
alienating your customers and doing a disservice to IPv6 and the
internet as a whole.
You are publishing records for www.cogentco.com, which means
that I CANNOT reach it to even look at your looking gl
Randy Bush wrote:
As for accusations, I challenge you to show where I accused them of
anything.
From: patr...@ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:09:58 -0400
Subject: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <
Nathan Ward wrote:
On 16/10/2009, at 1:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Is there any good solution to this? I don't expect us to fill the /32
to justify expanding it (although I do see ARIN appears to have left
space for up to a /29; I guess that's their sparse allocation policy?).
Your justificati
Completely agreed; in many situations even if one of those carrier
locked data centers allow another carrier in, they may severely limit
the portfolio of services that are allowed to be offered by them.
For example, one of the vendors listed below only allows "lit"
crossconnects from 3rd party
Ken Gilmour wrote:
Hi There,
I am looking for carriers who offer peering in Latin America
(Specifically Costa Rica). So far the only carrier in Costa Rica who I
have been able to find that does this is ADN (American Data Networks,
www.data.cr). While they are already on my list for a quote, we n
Alex Balashov wrote:
Thought-provoking article by Paul Vixie:
http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1647302
I doubt Henry Ford would appreciate the Mustang.
-Dave
Alex Balashov wrote:
For example, perhaps in the case of CDNs geographic optimisation
should be in the province of routing (e.g. anycast) and not DNS?
-- Alex
In most cases it already is. He completely fails to address the concept
of Anycast DNS and assumes people are using statically ma
The problem with that solution mainly being that the application itself
still needs some sort of intelligence as well as the border device
potentially doing L7 operations (header insertion/etc.) - unless you're
OK with generally losing all information about the source of incoming
tra
This has been a recurring problem, especially in the Bay Area - and it
seems as though neither side really cares all that much.
-Dave
Andris Kalnozols wrote:
This post to the NANOG list in the hope that an interested
engineer from either Qwest or GBLX will act on the problem
I have observed.
Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:31:38PM +0100, Matthias Leisi wrote:
Mark Andrews schrieb:
I don't see any reason to complain based on those numbers.
It's just a extremely high growth period due to technology
change over bring in new functionalit
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Feb 10, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:
Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:31:38PM +0100, Matthias Leisi wrote:
Mark Andrews schrieb:
I don't see any reason to complain based on those numbers.
It's just a extremely high gro
Ravi Pina wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:39:25AM -0400, Rodrick Brown wrote:
Not sure if anyone has followed the recent announcement of OnLive and
their new gaming service which will basically allow them to stream
video game gameplay output realtime to any commodity PC over a
broadband net
Wade Peacock wrote:
We had a discussion today about IPv6 today. During our open thinking
the topic of client equipment came up.
We all commented that we have not seen any consumer grade IPv6 enable
internet gateways (routers/firewalls), a kin to the ever popular
Linksys 54G series, DLinks , SMC
I purchased a single GigE transport link from them between a off-net
building that they lit for us and a lit site. Install went without
issue, including pulling in new fiber. Never underestimate the
advantages of having pole and conduit rights. My only complaint would
be interval - it took n
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:26:16 +0900
From: Randy Bush
arista 7120t-4s...
hot box. but you are giving away the secret sauce!
Hot box for the datacenter, but small buffers make it unsuited for
long distances. In the right place, this box can't be beaten
On 3/27/11 2:53 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 25, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Single AS worldwide is fine with or without a backbone.
Only if you want to make use of ugly ugly BGP hacks on your routers, or, you
don't care about Site A being
able to hear announcements from Sit
On 4/20/11 1:42 PM, Eduardo Schoedler wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Bret Palsson wrote:
I submitted my objects April 11. the mtrner object needs to be created
by the db-admin. I realize this is a volunteer thing. Could I help out
or could the people that are helping out look at adding my record? I
On 4/23/11 6:06 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
You can try the SCW IRR [1].
It's free, but is in Portuguese.
Reference:
[1] http://whois.scw.net.br/
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Sounds like that doesn't help the OP, who wanted help with RPSL, not
*really* help from AltDB.
Actually it does, because of a wizar
If you or others are not receiving a satisfactory reply from us (Netflix)
on this issue, please feel free to reach out directly and I'll make sure it
gets handled.
So far as we know, we handle CGNAT (and IPv6) appropriately. Sometimes
ranges get reassigned and the data that we have gets stale - th
92 matches
Mail list logo
