ient
> in what you accept, and strict in what you emit."
Personally, I don't care what people use as long as they don't start
piling up like this:
sv: re: sv: re: ax: er: tr: gq: The original subject here
That's really annoying...
--
Grant
On 2011-12-01, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:40:43PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> Personally, I don't care what people use as long as they don't start
>> piling up like this:
>>
>> sv: re: sv: re: ax: er: tr: gq: The original subject h
view it in
> the pager, then close it, coming back to the index, the byte number has
> changed to the lines number (76), which I'd like to have there all the
> time.
With IMAP there's no way to know the number of lines in a message
until after it's been opened. IOW, you can't
he 'p' key in slrn. I read all mailing lists (including this
one) via the NNTP server at gmane.org
I find slrn+gmane to be far more efficient than having all that stuff
actually sent to me and then having to sort it into mailboxes and read
it with mutt.
--
Grant Edwards
nd ran the messages through
formail to remove the tags.
These days I leave all my mail on an IMAP server, so that approach
wouldn't really work unless I could run procmail/formail on the
server.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I hope something GOOD
stipped the tags out for years and never noticed any
problem with any of the mailing lists I posted to. But, IMO,
gmane+slrn is far superior (if gmane carries the list in question).
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I had a lease on an
On 2012-04-12, Sebastian Schwarz wrote:
> On 2012-04-11 at 12:58 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> It may not be applicable, but back before I switched to usnig
>> gmane for reading mailing lists, I used a procmail script to
>> sort mailing list postings into their ow
ail based on 'mydata' and
> the results of some-program..., maybe you shouldn't use mutt, which I
> believe is designed for interactive use.
It works fine for some cases sending mail non-interactive:
echo "this is the message body" | mutt -s "
t; less secure - try telnetting to that port and seeing.
The "openssl s_client -connect " command can be awfully
useful when diagnosing stuff like this...
http://qmail.jms1.net/test-auth.shtml
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I want to mail a
nts because the MX record for the
domain in the message From: header didn't match up with the static IP.
I finally had to give up sending e-mail direct and went through the
mail server provided by my ISP and/or mail provider.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I li
On 2012-09-25, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:25:22PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2012-09-25, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
>> > [ Ian Barton wrote on Tue 25.Sep'12 at 7:04:39 +0100 ]
>> >
>> >> On 24/09/12 18:52, Jerem
On 2012-09-29, P. Mazart wrote:
> Ambrevar schrieb am 28.09.2012 13:22:13:
>> ??? [Content-Disposition-Header] ???
>>
>> But I must disagree: a *lot* of people are using the stock MUA.
>> Simply because they don't care. That's why this issue shouldn't be
>> neglected.
>
> I agree. But is this real
mail from a mailing list temporarily, use the
"nomail" setting. The simplest example is
set LISTNAME nomail
The list uses the "majordomo" server. More info here:
http://www.greatcircle.com/majordomo/
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.
lliant!
I've been swearing under my breath at Microsoft for _years_ because
all of Outlook's attachements (other than MS Office documents) get
sent as application/octet-stream.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! if it GLISTENS,
would be useful as-is in a procmail
recipe -- it's intended for use when viewing messages, so you do
"loose" attachements that aren't text/plain or text/html.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! My Aunt MAUREEN was a
between good (wrapped
lines and trimmed/interleaved posting) and evil (unwrapped lines and
Microsoft-style top-posting). That war is always being fought even if
it's out-of-sight. Seemingly innocuous events can spark a battle.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edward
re two kinds of people:
>>
>> 1) Those who oppose ambiguity
>> 2) Those who are wrong
>
>[...]
>
> ok, thanks for clarifying that. Seems a very rigit method of judging
> a person but hey, i'm sure you're right.
Of course he's right. You can tell
kind taught on real typwriters with paper and eraser by
instructors trying to prepare people for entry into positions where
typing correctly was your _job_ a couple mistakes in an important
letter could put you on the unemployment line).
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards
rs of, say, GMail.
There are those of us that use mutt as the UI for GMail. :)
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! does your DRESSING
at ROOM have enough ASPARAGUS?
gmail.com
use mutt as an MUA for GMail, but I neglected
> to consider that small group.
I think there are probably about seven of us world-wide, so
statistically speaking we are completely negligible. :)
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Now I understand the
y too bad. When I read messages in mutt that
were composed in the Gmail web UI, they're usually OK. It's the
Google Groups Web UI for newsgroups and mailing lists that's an
unmitigated disaster
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Mr and Mrs PED, c
m are always very badly written and rarely contain
enough information to even guess what the poster is asking, let alone
formulate a useful answer. Attempts to pry useful information from
the poster usually prove fruitless.
I killfiled all postings from google groups years ago...
--
Grant Edwards
On 2012-11-30, Jim Graham wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:20:00PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> I killfiled all postings from google groups years ago...
>
> Well, I suppose you'll never be on my list, then (it's a support and
> announcement type list for
On 2012-12-01, jim graham wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 02:12:03AM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2012-11-30, Jim Graham wrote:
>
>> > announcement type list for the freeware hurricane tracker (JStrack)
> []
>> > It's a google groups list.
>
&g
On 2012-12-01, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Grant Edwards [11-30-12 21:13]:
> ...
>> I think the Yahoo list server can be used by anybody (I guess you have
>> to sign up for a Yahoo account, to do admin stuff). They offer a web
>> UI, but you don't actually have t
On 2012-12-01, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Grant Edwards [12-01-12 10:27]:
>> On 2012-12-01, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>>> Yahoo now requires posting from a yahoo account via their smtp or
>>> from their web service,
>>
>> Weird. I posted to a Yahoo
On 2012-12-02, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Grant Edwards [12-01-12 11:07]:
>> On 2012-12-01, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> ...
>> > I am not explaining properly/sufficiently. Yahoo *requires* your posting
>> > addr matches your smtp.
>
>:^)
>
>> Ah
On 2012-12-01, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:20:00PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> The main Python mailing list gets regular posts from Google Groups.
>> Those posts are always malformatted (the formatting seems to change
>> over the years, but it never
es Mutt to bypass the system configuration file.
That may be telling mutt to ignore the configuration file that you're
specifying with the -F options.
I do the exact command above all the time (I have 4 different muttrc
files. It always works fine for me without the "-n&quo
port 25 which is UNauthenticated.
>>
>> See the SMTP AUTH verb. Anything you can do on those oddball ports,
> [lots of additional info deleted for brevity]
>
> Thanks. I only went by what I read in comments in /etc/sendmail.cf .
If you keep looking at sen
On 2013-04-06, Jonny Osch?tzky wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
>> The local read test really seems to indicate that it's not the database
>> backend that is controlling performance when switching folders here. It is
>> presumable network communication with Google's imap servers. And that
>> presumably means t
On 2013-04-07, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 04:01:25PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
>> Usually if I get to the point where I decide I'm going to have to look
>> in "All Mail" for something, I fire up a browser and do it via the
>> GM
quot;google way". Google's philosophy is roughly this: since
disk space is free and unlimited, and Google's search/tagging is so
utterly cool, there's no cost to keeping all mail forever. OTOH, there
_is_ a cost in deleting an e-mail that you later find out you need.
--
Grant E
. It takes several extra
steps to delete it from 'All Mail'. Why should I do that extra work?
What do I gain? Having that message sitting in All Mail doesn't cost
me anything, and there have been several times when I deleted something
and later needed it. Fortunate
On 2013-04-13, James Griffin wrote:
> Wed 10.Apr'13 at 14:25:10 +0000 Grant Edwards
>> On 2013-04-10, James Griffin wrote:
>>
>> > Well, yes I do have an archiving system but really i'm only interested
>> > in keepi
k (at least it never has for me).
Mutt doesn't allow you to enter mailbox names with spaces in them. It
will, however, auto-complete names with spaces. To get to All Mail,
you have to enter '=[Gmail]/All' and then hit [Tab] followed by
[Enter].
--
Grant Edwards
y way to look up the answer is
to already know how the answer is spelled. For this particular
question, googling "emacs reformat paragraph command" gets you the
answer in the summary shown for the first hit -- but that's only
because I knew what phrase to google... :)
r (incoming mail).
This allows outbound mail to be handled (and logged) by a single
method for multiple sources (mutt, cron, whatever), but configuration
is far simpler than postfix/qmail/sendmail.
http://msmtp.sourceforge.net/
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! What I
On 2014-01-08, Richard Z wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:48:18PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2014-01-04, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
>>
>> > Recent posts made me aware of the fact, that mutt supports SMPT. So
>> > far I have been using postfix for mail tr
On 2014-01-08, Kim Christensen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 02:23:31PM +0100, Richard Z wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:48:18PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> > On 2014-01-04, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
>> > Do you need/want outbound messages to be q
On 2014-01-17, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
> Ever since, the linux mutt has aperiodically closed the mailbox with
> a message which disappears too quickly for me to see, and usually
> happens when I am not looking at email anyway. This happens several
> times a day. It sometimes, but not even a ma
109
gmail-imap4 74.125.142.109
[I haven't actually tried either of these...]
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Did I SELL OUT yet??
at
gmail.com
oxes for new mail).
I though mutt supported IMAP's IDLE command. That should reduce the
latency to well under a second.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! ! Up ahead! It's a
at DONUT HUT!!
gmail.com
On 2014-04-15, Chris Down wrote:
> Grant Edwards writes:
>> I though mutt supported IMAP's IDLE command. That should reduce the
>> latency to well under a second.
>
> At least in my experience, IMAP IDLE on mutt results in sporadic
> lockups (on Google Apps, at leas
ezone. He wants to use his
local timezone.
Changing the TZ environment variable to match his local timezone
should work (modulo possibly broken libraries that don't handle the
case where a user's timezone and the system's timezone are different).
--
Grant Edwards gra
On 2014-07-09, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:33:40PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2014-07-09, Derek Martin wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:48:07AM +, Dave Kuhlman wrote:
>> >> My email server is in a different timezone from whe
you may be able to use the davmail gateway
http://davmail.sourceforge.net/
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Oh my GOD -- the
at SUN just fell into YANKEE
gmail.comSTADIUM!!
tp
$ make
$ sudo make install
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Am I in GRADUATE
at SCHOOL yet?
gmail.com
want to leave your mail on Google's servers (which is
what I do), then you'll want to use IMAP.
If you want to send mail via the GMail STMP server, the SMTP feature
in mutt works fine -- that way you don't have to set up an MTA (qmail,
sendmail, postfix, etc.) on you
//$URL";
if $MRC 'ping()' 2>/dev/null ; then
echo 'firefox already running'
echo $MRC "openURL($URL,$CMD)"
$MRC "openURL($URL,$CMD)"
else
echo 'firefox not running'
echo firefox "$URL"
firef
On 2015-04-28, Grant Edwards wrote:
> Yep. What many of us do is use w3m to view inside mutt, and then
> define a 'print' command to view it externally:
>
> text/html; w3m -T text/html -dump; copiousoutput; print = firefoxurl %s;
Uh, in case your crystal ball was brok
On 2015-04-28, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-04-28, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> Yep. What many of us do is use w3m to view inside mutt, and then
>> define a 'print' command to view it externally:
>>
>> text/html; w3m -T text/html -dump; copiousoutput
hut,
and locked _by_Google_, and 100% under control _of_Google_.
Mutt has not be "secured" by Google, therefore it is not secure.
1/2 ;)
I still use Google for e-mail, because it sucks less that all the
other options I've tried...
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards
has finished with them. The
default is well within the RFC-specified minimum amount of time (30
minutes) before a server is allowed to do this, but in practice the
RFC does get violated every now and then. Reduce this number if you
find yourself getting disconnected from your IMAP server
On 2015-07-17, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-07-17, Aurélien Rivet wrote:
>> The problem is that my mutt can't
>> keep an IMAP connexion for a longtime and I get a "mailbox closed"
>> message at the bottom after a random time.
> Try setting imap_keepa
ry week or two I'd tell
myself "there's got to be a setting for that -- I should look into
that when I have a second..."
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! The Korean War must
at have been fun.
gmail.com
hen I'm looking
for some particular large attachment and have to open a series of
messages to find the one I want. On those occasions I often open up
the Gmail web UI instead...
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I feel ... JU
On 2016-02-21, li...@2ion.de wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 08:45:19PM +0100, Gabriel Philippe wrote:
>> I found nullmailer, but it is designed for a system-wide use:
>> conffiles in /etc/, stuff in /var, etc. I'm not sure I would manage to
>> have it work differently.
>>
>> Any idea?
>
> I am
;app specific" seems to imply, after all
it's not "app+machine specific"]. Or is mutt on machine A considered
to be a different "app" than mutt on machine B?
I've got probably 5-6 IMAP/SMTP client apps per machine on 3 different
machines. Am I going to need 18
On 2016-04-25, David Champion wrote:
> * On 25 Apr 2016, Grant Edwards wrote:
[regarding Google "app passwords"]
>> Do you need different, unique passwords for mutt, imap, msmtp,
>> offlineimap, and all other IMAP or SMTP clients on a particular
>> machine?
>
temporary file when the viewer exits.
Here's what I use for viewing .pdf files with atril:
#!/bin/bash
TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d)
mv "$1" $TMPDIR
NAME=$(basename "$1")
setsid bash -c "atril '$TMPDIR/$NAME'; rm '$TMPDIR/$NAME'; rmdir '$TMPD
On 2016-07-28, dale wrote:
> I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I
> use SMTP
How do you "directly send" without using SMTP?
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I don't understand
displays the message "Mailbox closed". I've already
> looked around for a solution and as you can see at the end of my
> configuration I tried setting a very small time interval to keepalive
> and also mail_check, but still nothing.
Here's what I use:
set mail_check=90
On 2016-11-02, Mihail Konev wrote:
> What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a
> dedicated folder?
I used to use procmail for this.
Now I use slrn and news.gmane.org instead.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Let'
Is there anything one can do when sending a plain text e-mail message
to tell GUI-based MUAs that they should display it in a fixed font?
I would have sworn that a lot of GUI e-mail programs used to use a
fixed-width font for text/plain content-tupe, but they no longer seem
to do that.
--
Grant
On 2017-04-26, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día miércoles, abril 26, 2017 a las 07:18:30p. m. +0000, Grant Edwards
> escribió:
>
>> > Why should a sender of txt mail be worried about how Gmail or any other
>> > MUA is rendering a txt mail? Isn't this the respon
ion
> form) by a mailcap entry.
The question was how to do it _within_ _mutt_ instead of preparing an
HTML or PDF file externally and attaching it.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! When this load is
at DONE I think I'll wash it
gmail.comAGAIN ...
On 2017-04-27, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Grant Edwards [04-27-17 11:21]:
>> On 2017-04-27, Darac Marjal wrote:
>> >
>> >>OK, so how does one do that within mutt?
>> >
>> > I would suggest that the most prudent approach is to use a lightwe
text body into multipart-alternative containing the plaintext
version and an HTML version comprising nothing but the plaintext
message between tags.
Another nice option would be support for running the text/plain body
through markdown/RST/asciidoc in order to produce the html
alternative.
Unfort
On 2017-04-28, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 27.04.17 09:21, Darac Marjal wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 08:54:45PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> > OK, so how does one do that within mutt?
>>
>> I would suggest that the most prudent approach is to use a light
can't find it mentioned anywhere in the
docs. All of the messages I compose with 1-long-line-per paragraph is
still sent by mutt as text/plain.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I always have fun
at
On 2017-04-26, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2017-04-26, Will Yardley wrote:
[...]
>>> > > Is there anything one can do when sending a plain text e-mail message
>>> > > to tell GUI-based MUAs that they should display it in a fixed font?
[...]
>> Send in H
= "duplicate message" and invert it, then
> use that to (by default "l") the display.
>
> l!~=
>
> Should be able to wrap that in a folder-hook if you want it to always
> take place.
Why not just delete the duplicate e-mails?
That would seem
On 2018-01-22, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 15:32:50 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> Why not just delete the duplicate e-mails?
>>
>> That would seem to be a more efficient way of "always hiding them".
>
> The problem arises when using notmuch
oticed that the handling of text/plain by popular GUI MUAs has
gotten so bad in past few years, that I'm now reluctant to send mail
in that format.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! The PINK SOCKS were
On 2018-03-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 08:06:12PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
>> I've noticed that the handling of text/plain by popular GUI MUAs has
>> gotten so bad in past few years, that I'm now reluctant to send mail
>>
On 2018-03-07, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 19:37:39 CET, Scott Kostyshak
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 08:06:12PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>>
>>> I've noticed that the handling of text/plain by popular GUI MUAs has
>>&g
On 2018-03-07, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 20:13:52 CET, Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>> On 2018-03-07, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm used to receive my mails via fetchmail+procmail+mutt and
>>> mails in HTML
>>> are in
nd that another disadvantage of bouncing e-mails to addresses
that aren't contained in the message headers is that some e-mail
systems will think they're spam and discard them. What I don't grok
is how an SMTP server would differentiate between a bounced message
and a bcc'd messag
/html -dump; copiousoutput; print = chromiumurl %s;
$ cat ~/bin/chromiumurl
#!/bin/bash
URL="$1"
test -f "$URL" && URL="file://$URL"
expr match "$URL" '.*://.*' >/dev/null || URL="http://$URL";
exec chromium &
quot;
test -f "$URL" && URL="file://$URL"
expr match "$URL" '.*://.*' >/dev/null || URL="http://$URL";
exec chromium "$URL"
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Am I elected yet?
at
gmail.com
On 2018-04-13, Jens John wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, at 21:34, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> I have my mailcap entry set up so that "viewing" an html message uses
>> w3m but "printing" an html message opens it in chromium
>
> Many thanks for pointing me to the
(and
has for many years).
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Either CONFESS now or
at we go to "PEOPLE'S COURT"!!
gmail.com
the string
'Sent', you can do this:
Press 'c'
Press '='
Press '['
Press
Type 'Sent'
Press
Press
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! With YOU, I can be
at MYSELF ... We don't NEED
gmail.comDan Rather ...
tt prints an error
message and stays on the message compose screen. It's pretty
obvious...
> and so has to contact the recipient. (The Fcc'd copy contains no
> information to tell the user whether the mail was sent.) This was
> not a rare occurrence.
--
Grant Edwards
On 2019-06-04, Jack M wrote:
> On Tue, June 4, 2019 10:46 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2019-06-04, Jack M wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The reason (or *a* reason) is that the old way led to the following
>>> situation: Fcc first, then try to send, something weir
On 2019-07-27, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> I have very recently switched back to mutt. My 1st question is - is
> the preferred way to get imap emails in the mutt inbox.
I've been using mutt with Gmail for 10-15 years, and I just point mutt
at Gmail's IMAP server and leave all of the email on that ser
e.
>
> This. Having used slrn in the past, I was surprised mutt didn't have
> some kind of killfile mechanism readily available (or, if it's
> available, I have completely missed it).
That's one of the reasons I use slrn rather than mutt for following
mai
On 2019-09-07, Italo Penna wrote:
> I'm a UNIX user trying to move from a GUI email ( Thunderbird ) to mutt.
> However most of company employers are MS Outlook users and, as expected,
> all them send html emails with tons of awkward stuff like tables,
> in-line images and meetings appointments
easy-to-read email (the recipient
has to save it as a text file and open it with notepad++ in a fixed
font for it to be readable).
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Go on, EMOTE!
at I was RAISED on thought
gmail.comballoons!!
On 2019-10-29, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Grant Edwards [10-29-19 13:10]:
>
>> Muttdown (a "sendmail" filter) which creates mutlipart alternative
>> html/text messages is the only reason I've been able to continue to
>> use mutt for the past 5-6 years. Ab
On 2019-10-29, (Nuno Silva)
wrote:
> On 2019-10-29, John Long wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:50:05 -0400
>> Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>>
>>> * Grant Edwards [10-29-19 13:10]:
> [...]
>>> > Muttdown (a "sendmail" filter) which cre
On 2019-10-29, martin f krafft wrote:
> [/home/grante/bin/unmime.py: html rendered using w3m]
> Regarding the following, written by “Grant Edwards” on 2019-10-29 at 17:09 Uhr
> -:
>
> Muttdown (a “sendmail” filter) which creates mutlipart alternative html/
> text me
this argument, so maybe age isn't
> that relevant.
Just because I've realized that my need for effective communication
requires that I create multipart HTML/plaintext messages it doesn't
mean I'm not grumpy about HTML mails...
I just know when I've lost the battle.
--
On 2019-10-30, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:31:19PM -0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2019-10-29, martin f krafft wrote:
>> That's true (as I understood the problem, anyway). Fortunately, I
>> never needed to send a signed message with an attac
fit to the markup-language apparoach is that for some
reason I find that when proof-reading something in a different
"format" I spot more errors than I do when proof-reading the "source"
as I typed it. I remember the same being true from my days using
TeX/LaTe
On 2020-04-04, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
> However, I'm increasingly finding myself having to resort to various
> tricks to deal with HTML only emails (with picture attachments),
> calendar invites, and other oddities and awkward stuff people send.
I hever had that much trouble _reading_ HTML email
On 2020-04-18, Derek Martin wrote:
> Termite emulates an RS-232 terminal--a simple (AKA "dumb") ASCII
> terminal, whereas rxvt has a more complex interface that allows
> sending and receiving a variety of control sequences to represent
> when someone has pressed a key with a modifier key (like Al
On 2020-05-02, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:57:14PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
>> Moreover, you appear to be committing the logical fallacy called
>> "argumentum ad populum" (aka "majoritarianism").
>
> No, because accepted practice is determined by the majority (in this
> case o
On 2020-11-09, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users wrote:
>>I use Alt-Shift-v and I think that is the default binding. HTH
>
> Thanks, very much, interesting (not easily intuited) sequence.
Hence the manual.
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#threads
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
