On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 08:35:09PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 05:15:54AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> >
> > here are some examples to test your ideas:
> >
> > Subject: THIS SUBJECT IS IN CAPS ONLY
> > Subject: THIS 1 2!
> > Subject: !ME TOO!
> > Subject: A N D M
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 02:16:47PM -0400, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
> > (the mail would end up in my inbox instead of the list folder).
>
> That should not happen. What does, say, your mutt-users procmail recipe look
> like?
>
> Mine's:
>
> :0 H
> * ^TO.*@mutt.org
> mutt/
>
As I'm mostly only list
David Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Somehow I've missed the start of Edmund's .procmailrc. But why wouldn't
> one do it this way rather than MD5 all that stuff manually? Have you
> found the message-id header to be that unreliable?
Pointless paranoia really, but imagine this: someone could subscr
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS writes:
> David Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Somehow I've missed the start of Edmund's .procmailrc. But why wouldn't
> > one do it this way rather than MD5 all that stuff manually? Have you
> > found the message-id header to be that unreliable?
>
> Pointless paranoia rea
Hi all,
how can I set the envelope-from independently from From: ? As is, mutt
copies From: into envelope-from. I want to use a mangled From: as spam
protection, but list servers need to see a correct envelope-from
(unless it's lists like this, which seems to accept any 'ol stuff)?
Of course it
* Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-17 23:59:39 +0100]:
> David Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Somehow I've missed the start of Edmund's .procmailrc. But why wouldn't
> > one do it this way rather than MD5 all that stuff manually? Have you
> > found the message-id header to be t
On 2002-04-18 Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> how can I set the envelope-from independently from From: ? As is, mutt
> copies From: into envelope-from. I want to use a mangled From: as spam
> protection, but list servers need to see a correct envelope-from
> (unless it's lists like this, whi
hi,
I've got a prb with quoting, in my .muttrc I wrote :
send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
"set attribution = \"D'`if [ \`date '+%w'\` = 1 ];then echo al;else echo
ar;fi` %d, %n en deus skrivet:\""
and when I launch mutt, I got «sh: [: too many arguments»
But when I type «echo "set attributio
Simon, et al --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% functionality "retired" in favour of good IMAP support and a HOWTO for
% fetchmail included in the Mutt distribution package?
Since mutt doesn't have the ability to send mail itself, but depends on
an MTA, I think it makes perfect sense to not
Hi,
I still have not resolved my old problem with synchronization of
my home linux box with remote IMAP store (I am not dial-up, so
I do not want to work with emails online). I have not managed to
get working mailsync (http://mailsync.sourceforge.net) and
because I would like to use locally UW IM
> if "large enough" cache size is used, late arriving duplicate mail
> could be caught by procmail.
Right, but this whole subthread is about throwing away the first message and
keeping the second. As has been mentioned, if a "large" cache is used, it
means you have to hide the first message for a
David, et al --
...and then David Rock said...
%
...
% Mutt's default for saving messages seems to revolve around the From
% address (e.g. mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wants to save to ~/Mail/foo). Does
Right (though there is a save_alias patch that will let you save to the
alias rather than the
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 08.20 -0500]:
> Since mutt doesn't have the ability to send mail itself, but depends on
> an MTA, I think it makes perfect sense to not bother with "receiving"
> mail itself, and I'm all for tossing out that chunk of code.
I second that.
[...snip...]
mutt has two varieties of pop support, and its not clear which (or
both) varieties you are talking about:
1 - The fetch-mail function
This doesn't seem enormously useful now that mutt has "mailbox"
support for pop://.
2 - browsing pop:// mailboxes
This is critical. I and others I know use mutt
Hi, all --
...and then s. keeling said...
%
% - Kibo probably already has the fix implemented.
There he is! I knew it would come to this soon :-)
It's fun, though!
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up
>On 17/04/02, from the brain of Rocco Rutte tumbled:
> Hi,
>
> * Michael Montagne [04/17/02 20:25:08 CEST] wrote:
> > I want my sentbox folder to show me the recipient's name,
> > the date, etc. So I use this line in .muttrc. But all I get are
> blank
> > lines.
>
> > folder-hook sentbox se
Akkana --
...and then Akkana said...
%
...
% Mike Schiraldi writes:
...
% > the request is for a command which will initiate a reply to "A list" but not
% > Alice.
%
% Exactly!
...
%
% So I gather that mutt currently has no way of doing this. If I add
Yup.
% one, is there any chance it mig
Dan --
...and then Dan Lowe said...
%
...
% Don't tell me the list has more than one address... do I need to have
% multiple subscribe lines for it? Ugh.
While it only has one correct address, sometimes the gbnet address leaks
through. You probably don't want to subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED],
t
Martin, et al --
...and then Martin Karlsson said...
%
% * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 08.20 -0500]:
...
% > bother with a sendmail HOWTO, but *perhaps* pointers to web sites for
...
%
% hmmm,
% just a quick thought: perhaps a pointer to an existing resource? Is
% there something
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:00:03AM -0400, Sam Roberts wrote:
> 2 - browsing pop:// mailboxes
>
> This is critical. I and others I know use mutt on varieties of
> machines, where we need to check our email online, and DON'T have
> imap access. The ability to do a quick check of our mail, without
>
Hi!
...and then mutt-users said...
%
...
% I already searched the newsgroups concerning imap and mutt and didn´t find anything
helpful.
Yeah; this is a new one.
% But i am seeking to read my mailinglists and news on exchange with my mutt.
Unless you can come up with how it's already been
Greetings.
I checked the list archive, and I can't seem to find an answer to this
particular question. I'm using imap://localhost/ as my mailbox, which
works fine with other MUAs, such as Netscape.
Normally, when using a local mail spool, rather than an IMAP connection
(I use IMAP for my ema
Matej Cepl wrote:
> Do you know whether isync is/will be ever extended so that it
> would be able to synchronize two IMPAP stores (I guess, that
> adding that capability should not be so complicated, but of
> course I will not do it, so I may be totally wrong)?
This is not something that I plan t
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 09:31:44AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> This is not something that I plan to work on for isync, but if
> someone else wants to give it a shot, they can.
Oh, well. I was afraid of that :-(.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02
begin David T-G quotation:
>
> I don't think we should bother with a fetchmail HOWTO just like we don't
> bother with a sendmail HOWTO, but *perhaps* pointers to web sites for
> fetchmail and getmail as well as sendmail, qmail, postfix, exim, ssmtp,
> and maybe a few others (or maybe only one or
I have a pop3 mail account. I currently use fetchmail with mutt. Is pop3
support built into mutt? Which is better to use with mutt, fetchmail or
the pop3 support? I also use procmail. Any hints will be greatly
appreciated.
Regards,
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Don't Fear The Penguin."
msg27365/pgp
Hi!
I've just received a message with these headers:
Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=DCberpr=FCfun?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?g?= von E-Mail Adressen?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Is this the "best" way to encode the word "Überprüfung" at this
position? What makes me wonder, is why the "g" has been put
Mike --
...and then keeper1 said...
%
% I have a pop3 mail account. I currently use fetchmail with mutt. Is pop3
% support built into mutt? Which is better to use with mutt, fetchmail or
% the pop3 support? I also use procmail. Any hints will be greatly
% appreciated.
Although I hear that mutt'
* On 2002.04.18, in <20020418175408.GA@watcher>,
* "keeper1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a pop3 mail account. I currently use fetchmail with mutt. Is pop3
> support built into mutt? Which is better to use with mutt, fetchmail or
> the pop3 support? I also use procmail. Any hints
Hello,
Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
In some special situations I'd like a reply to appear like a forward, yet
preserving the references (In-Reply-To: and such). Something like
"
You bastards!
- Original message follows -
Date: Mon, 01 Ap
Hi all
Sometimes when I forward an email, I want the email to appear in the
same message and not as an attachment. Is this possible using mutt?
Many thanks
Dean Benson
msg27370/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dean,
> I use the following in my ~/.muttrc to make sure my imap folders refresh
> in a timely manner.
>
> set timeout=15
> set mail_check=60
Thank you. But, is there a way to make it update whenever I want by
pressing a certain key? :)
Thanks.
Colin
--
Colin W. Wetherbee
http://www.dente
Dean --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Hi all
Hello!
%
% Sometimes when I forward an email, I want the email to appear in the
% same message and not as an attachment. Is this possible using mutt?
Yes.
%
% Many thanks
Many welcomes.
%
% Dean Benson
HTH & HAND & RTFM for
Previously, Colin Wetherbee wrote:
>
> Thank you. But, is there a way to make it update whenever I want by
> pressing a certain key? :)
qmutt:)
Seriously, I have to do that sometimes if I'm waiting impatiently for
something I know should be there by now. If you find a way to do what you
> I use the following in my ~/.muttrc to make sure my imap folders refresh
> in a timely manner.
>
> set timeout=15
> set mail_check=60
Ah, nevermind. I found a key binding to use. In case anyone else is
interested, I've used the following line in my .muttrc.
bind index "^" imap-fetch-mail
Previously, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Sometimes when I forward an email, I want the email to appear in the
> same message and not as an attachment. Is this possible using mutt?
# Use MIME (file attachment) when forwarding, or just inline text?
set mime_forward=ask-yes
I prefer 'ask-yes' so
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote David Champion thusly...
>
> * On 2002.04.18, in <20020418175408.GA@watcher>,
> * "keeper1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a pop3 mail account. I currently use fetchmail with mutt. Is pop3
> > support built into mutt? Which is better to use with
* Bernard Massot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 13:20]:
> I've got a prb with quoting, in my .muttrc I wrote:
>
> send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
> "set attribution = \"D'`if [ \`date '+%w'\` = 1 ];then echo al;else echo
> ar;fi` %d, %n en deus skrivet:\""
> and when I launch mutt, I got
>
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 17:57]:
> I've just received a message with these headers:
>
> Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=DCberpr=FCfun?=
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?g?= von E-Mail Adressen?
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
>
> Is this the "best" way to encode the
> word "Überprüfung"
Matthew --
...and then mstevenson said...
%
% Hello,
Hi!
%
% Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
% In some special situations I'd like a reply to appear like a forward, yet
% preserving the references (In-Reply-To: and such). Something like
The only
mstevenson wrote:
> Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
set header
Hi David,
On April 18, 2002, 12:31 PM, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then mstevenson said...
> %
> % Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
> % In some special situations I'd like a reply to appear like a forward, yet
> % preserving the references (In-Reply-To:
»Sven Guckes« sagte am 2002-04-18 um 21:13:57 +0200 :
> * Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 17:57]:
> > Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=DCberpr=FCfun?=
> > =?iso-8859-1?Q?g?= von E-Mail Adressen?
> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
> >
> > Is this the "best" way to encode the
> > word
»keeper1« sagte am 2002-04-18 um 13:54:08 -0400 :
> the pop3 support? I also use procmail. Any hints will be greatly
> appreciated.
If you also use procmail, then I'd definitaly stick with
fetchmail. This way, you're also independant of the MUA, in case you
ever wish to downgrade to something e
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:40:09PM -0700, mstevenson wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On April 18, 2002, 12:31 PM, David T-G wrote:
> > ...and then mstevenson said...
> > %
> > % Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
> > % In some special situations I'd like a reply
hello,
sorry for the off-topic but I would like to add a rules to my procmailrc
to create archive by month; ie mutt-users.april.2002
Any Idea ?
yours,
binny
--
... et si nous sommes tous embarqués sur la même planète, nous ne
sommes décidement pas du même monde.
-- Bertrand Cantat
°v°
On April 18, 2002, 12:36 PM, Michael Elkins wrote:
>
> mstevenson wrote:
> > Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
>
> set header
Just for the record: the complete solution to achieve an "Outlook-like" behavior
(yuck) with mutt is
set header
set inde
* Benjamin Michotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Apr 18. 2002 21:56]:
> hello,
>
> sorry for the off-topic but I would like to add a rules to my procmailrc
> to create archive by month; ie mutt-users.april.2002
>
> Any Idea ?
man 8 cron
man 5 crontab
man crontab
--
Mads Martin Jørgensen, http://mmj.d
* Benjamin Michotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 15:55]:
> sorry for the off-topic but I would like to add a rules to my procmailrc
> to create archive by month; ie mutt-users.april.2002
:0
* ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mutt-users.`date +"%B.%Y" | tr 'A-Z' 'a-z'`
The tr will do lower casing, as well.
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 03:32]:
> * On 2002.04.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> * "Rob 'Feztaa' Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So then how about ^[^a-z]+$ ? That would match anything that contained
> > only non-lowercase-letters, wouldn't it?
> This should work:
>
Could someone suggest why this dont include the signature in the email:
[eric@cherry ~] 1 $ mutt eric@localhost -s'test signature when mailing from command
line'
* On 2002.04.18, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "mstevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just for the record: the complete solution to achieve an "Outlook-like" behavior
>(yuck) with mutt is
>
> set header
> set indent_string=""
> set attribution="- Original message -"
>
> It
Hello,
Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
In some special situations I'd like a reply to appear like a forward, yet
preserving the references (In-Reply-To: and such). Something like
"
You bastards!
- Original message follows -
Date: Mon, 01 Apr
begin mstevenson quotation:
>
> Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
Yes.
--
Shawn McMahon| McMahon's Laws of Linux support:
http://www.eiv.com | 1) There's more than one way to do it
AIM: spmcmahonfedex, smcmahoneiv |
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 09:10:34PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Bernard Massot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 13:20]:
> > I've got a prb with quoting, in my .muttrc I wrote:
> >
> > send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
> > "set attribution = \"D'`if [ \`date '+%w'\` = 1 ];then echo al;else echo
> >
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 19:43]:
> »Sven Guckes« sagte am 2002-04-18 um 21:13:57 +0200 :
> > * Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 17:57]:
> > > Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=DCberpr=FCfun?=
> > > =?iso-8859-1?Q?g?= von E-Mail Adressen?
> > > User-Agent:
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 20:10]:
> Could someone suggest why this dont include the signature in the email:
> $ mutt eric@localhost -s test $ cat /tmp/sig
> set signature="echo Eric Smith|"'
the option "-F" specifies a *setup* file -
but your's contains the signature itself.
* On 2002.04.18, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone suggest why this dont include the signature in the email:
> [eric@cherry ~] 1 $ mutt eric@localhost -s'test signature when mailing from command
>line' cat /tmp/sig
> set signature="echo Eric S
* mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 19:59]:
> Just for the record: the complete solution to
> achieve an "Outlook-like" behavior (yuck) with mutt is
>
> set header
> set indent_string=""
> set attribution="- Original message -"
>
> It works like a charm.
this also earns you
»Sven Guckes« sagte am 2002-04-18 um 22:31:50 +0200 :
> beats me. do you have some more examples for which this happens?
> does mutt do the splitting of lines when the line is shorter?
Yes, it does.
> what happens now?
All the time I get (well, sorta, of course):
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=DCber
Alas! Bernard Massot spake thus:
> > try this:set attribution=`script`
> > im mutt, of course.
> good idea but I need a way to give the script the date of the mail
> if I launch it with %d, the script doesn't see the date but the string
> "%d"
Easy fix. In your muttrc do this: "set attributio
--c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Mads Martin J=F8rgensen spake thus:
> > sorry for the off-topic but I would like to add a rules to my procmailrc
> > to create archive by month; ie mutt-u
--bajzpZikUji1w+G9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Alexander Skwar spake thus:
> All the time I get (well, sorta, of course):
>=20
> Subject: =3D?iso-8859-1?Q?=3DDCberpr=3DFCfun?=3D
> =3D?iso-8859-1?
[Sorry if this is a repeat; I initially tried sending it to mutt-users and
mutt-dev, but it only seems to have made it onto mutt-dev. If anyone can
help me, I would be most appreciative!]
[I apologize if it's bad form to post this to both lists in the first
place.]
Hi. I'm having a bad problem w
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS spake thus:
> Pointless paranoia really, but imagine this: someone could subscribe
> to the same mailing list as you, with an address s
All it does is syntax highlighting, and not even perfectly, but I like it.
It's especially handy if like me you installed jed's muttrc.sl but use emacs
far more often than jed.
It's small, so I attached it.
--
Your armadillos smell lemony fresh!
Robert I. Reid | PGP/GPG Keys: http://astro.utoro
> % Don't tell me the list has more than one address... do I need to have
> % multiple subscribe lines for it? Ugh.
>
> While it only has one correct address, sometimes the gbnet address leaks
> through. You probably don't want to subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> though, because you'd only be pro
* mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 19:40]:
> From: mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Replying with headers
> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: ZipLip Sonoma v3.2
no name in FRO
68 matches
Mail list logo
