* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 19:43]: > »Sven Guckes« sagte am 2002-04-18 um 21:13:57 +0200 : > > * Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 17:57]: > > > Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=DCberpr=FCfun?= > > > =?iso-8859-1?Q?g?= von E-Mail Adressen? > > > User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i > > i suppose the mail user agent decided > > to split the rest onto the next line. > Well, but why did mutt do this? Even with the g, the line would have > been shorter than 75 characters, and thus would still comply to RfC. > Or does the RfC require the next line to start with a QP "header"?
beats me. do you have some more examples for which this happens? does mutt do the splitting of lines when the line is shorter? try these: Subject: Überprüfung von E-Mail Adressen? Subject: Überprüfung von E-MailAdressen Subject: Überprüfung von EMailAdressen Subject: Überprüfung von MailAdressen Subject: Überprüfung von Adressen what happens now? > > tell the programmers of that mail client then! > Uhm, that's the *mutt*-users list, isn't it? ;) > Or are you saying I should post this to mutt-dev? yep Sven
