»Sven Guckes« sagte am 2002-04-18 um 21:13:57 +0200 : > * Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 17:57]: > > Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=DCberpr=FCfun?= > > =?iso-8859-1?Q?g?= von E-Mail Adressen? > > User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i > > > > Is this the "best" way to encode the > > word "Überprüfung" at this position? > > No. Better is "Test". ;-)
;) > i suppose the mail user agent decided > to split the rest onto the next line. Well, but why did mutt do this? Even with the g, the line would have been shorter than 75 characters, and thus would still comply to RfC. Or does the RfC require the next line to start with a QP "header"? > tell the programmers of that mail client then! Uhm, that's the *mutt*-users list, isn't it? ;) In case you simply overlooked, the User-Agent was Mutt/1.3.28i. Or are you saying I should post this to mutt-dev? > Because RFC0815 defines it as an Ueber-Umlaut. ;-) ;) Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de | Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 4 days 0 hours 59 minutes
