-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
I've been noticing that when Mutt encounters a clearsigned pgp signiture
that I'm not getting the little 's' flag in the index and I don't seem
to be able to validate the signiture in anyway.
What's all that about then?
Many thanks
- --
Nic
Hi All
Does mutt come with ssl support? Here is my setup. My mail is sent to another machine
on my network. To access it I ssh to that other box and then read my mail. The problem
is when I want to attach files from my machine I have to scp them to the other machine
and the same applies for sa
* Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21-01-2002 09:23]:
> I've been noticing that when Mutt encounters a clearsigned pgp signiture
> that I'm not getting the little 's' flag in the index and I don't seem
> to be able to validate the signiture in anyway.
Check out:
Pcheck-tradition
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:28:34AM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Does mutt come with ssl support? Here is my setup. My mail is sent to
Yes. At least you can enable it at compile/configure time.
It's something like "--enable-ssl"
> another machine on my network. To access it I ssh to t
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:36:52AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:28:34AM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > Does mutt come with ssl support? Here is my setup. My mail is sent to
>
> Yes. At least you can enable it at compile/configure time.
> It's somethi
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 11:05:35AM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
> I downloaded mutt-1.3.25i.tar.gz and ran ./configure --enable-ssl and got the
>following error:
>
> configure: error: no curses library found
>
> is this because mutt-1.3.25i.tar.gz does not support it?
No, this is because you
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 08:11:18PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
| Andreas --
|
| ...and then Andreas Herceg said...
| %
| % OK, I did not know that X-Label is that common. Now I thought of just
| % defining 'X-Coprija: coprija'.
|
| If you were triggering something in mutt instead of in procmail the
Andreas Herceg wrote:
> OK, I did not know that X-Label is that common. Now I thought
> of just defining 'X-Coprija: coprija'.
>
> Now I would like to know if this would be against some standard
> which I do not know.
Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied:
> my understanding is that X headers
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 11:05:35AM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
>
> > I downloaded mutt-1.3.25i.tar.gz and ran ./configure --enable-ssl and got the
>following error:
> >
> > configure: error: no curses library found
> >
> > i
Andreas --
...and then Andreas Herceg said...
%
% On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 08:11:18PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% |
% | No, X-* is for defining your own headers, and there is no end to the list
% | of them :-)
%
% That is exactly what I thought.
%
% | It's simply that mutt specifically recognize
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
> > > > {imap.web.de/ssl}
> >
> > Have you tried this before upgrading?
>
> Please forgive my ignorance, but what exactly do I have to do?
OK.
1) Press c (for change mailbox)
2) As mailboxname, enter
{servername/ssl}
3) The
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 09:39:52PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> But how does it compare to mbox on the same FS? I'll bet it's still
> significantly slower.
opening times might be ... but think about updating times and the
"no locking needed" goodies :-)
--
Christian Ordig
Germany
* On 21-01-02 at 09:37
* René Clerc said
> * Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21-01-2002 09:23]:
>
> > I've been noticing that when Mutt encounters a clearsigned pgp signiture
> > that I'm not getting the little 's' flag in the index and I don't seem
> > to be able to validate the signitur
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 06:45:54PM -0800 I heard the voice of
Michael Elkins, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Mutt attempts to compensate for this by using quoted-printable encoding when
> it detects things that might break a signature, thus escaping the problem.
> But yes, mbox format is more suscept
On 2002-01-19 01:56:56 -0800, A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
>bradl@bellicha:/usr/local/src/mail/mutt> gpg mutt-1.3.26i.tar.gz.asc
>gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
>gpg: Signature made Fri 18 Jan 2002 03:45:17 AM PST using RSA key ID CE6AC6C1
>gpg: BAD signature from "Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PRO
* Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> At some point hitherto, Will Yardley hath spake thusly:
> > our office mail machine is (unfortunately) linux with ext2, and i
> > can attest to the fact that Maildir is pretty slow on ext2.
>
> And most other filesystems... Try it on FAT. =8^)
I t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone.
I've been looking through the docs and can't find what controls the
Reply-To header. I want to set folder-hooks for some mailing lists I
subscribe to where the users are inclined to hit the 'reply button' in
Outhouse rather than send to t
David T-G muttered:
> % how can i use close-hook and append-hook for tar.gz maildirs?
>
> You can't use append-hook; tar doesn't support appending (or at least not
> in any form that I've ever seen actually work, contrary to the promises
> made by the -a switch).
Quoting tar's man page:
-r, --a
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 at 12:43:26 +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> I've been looking through the docs and can't find what controls the
> Reply-To header. I want to set folder-hooks for some mailing lists I
> subscribe to where the users are inclined to hit the 'reply button' in
> Outhouse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 13:15
* Ken Wahl said
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:43:26PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone.
> > I've been looking through the docs and can't find what controls the
> > Reply-To header. I want to set folder-hooks fo
* Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-21 13:51]:
[...]
>
> Certainly seems to be it although I'm having a little trouble getting it
> to work. I keep getting a 'error missing parameter in line 316' (first
> line of the code below)
>
> send-hook . "my_hdr Reply-To: Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 14:12
* Im Eunjea said
> * Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-21 13:51]:
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > Certainly seems to be it although I'm having a little trouble getting it
> > to work. I keep getting a 'error missing paramet
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:25:56PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Remember that for many blind users these messages are being spoken
> to the reader by a voder. Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim
> quotations when replying ordinarily, when replying to a blind user it
> becomes outright r
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 11:15:33AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
>
> > > > > {imap.web.de/ssl}
> > >
> > > Have you tried this before upgrading?
> >
> > Please forgive my ignorance, but what exactly do I have to do?
>
> OK.
>
* Dave Price ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:25:56PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim quotations when replying
> > ordinarily, when replying to a blind user it becomes outright rude.
> Learn to use your screenreader better, and
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:32:18PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
> Downloaded mutt-1.3.26, I have installed ncurses, slang and
> openssl. Then ran ./configure --enable-imap --with-ssl and I'm
> getting an error as follows:
>
> checking for X509_new in -lcrypto... no
> configure: error: Unab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 14:40
* Thomas Hurst said
> * Dave Price ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:25:56PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > > Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim quotations when replying
> > > ordina
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:32:18PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
> I'm using debian right, so I did not download the tar.gz for openssl,
> I just ran a apt-get install openssl and it installed
> openssl_0.9.4-5_i386.deb. So whether it can find libcrypto I don't
> know, should I be using a diffeent v
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:42:59PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:32:18PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
>
> > Downloaded mutt-1.3.26, I have installed ncurses, slang and
> > openssl. Then ran ./configure --enable-imap --with-ssl and I'm
> > getting an error as foll
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:43:27PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:32:18PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
>
> > I'm using debian right, so I did not download the tar.gz for openssl,
> > I just ran a apt-get install openssl and it installed
> > openssl_0.9.4-5_i386.deb. So
Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:25) :
> Learn to use your screenreader better, and teach it to ignore or skip
> over quote chars at the start of a new line.
There is no point in sending a load of quoted stuff to anybody. Cut it
down to relevant part before you send. This is
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
> people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
> we spend all our time worrying about every minority
> problem/consideration we'll never get *anything* done :)
Is it not a minority problem.
Preben
--
() J
* Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * On 21-01-02 at 14:40
> * Thomas Hurst said
>
> > Being able to skip quotes is no excuse not to trim them; not caring
> > whether people will simply ignore your message because it appears to
> > have no content isn't either.
>
> How do you tell i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 15:08
* Preben Randhol said
> Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
> > people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
> > we spend all our time worrying about every minority
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 15:38
* Thomas Hurst said
> * Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > How do you tell if you are sending to a blind user?
>
> You don't; quoting properly has nothing to do with who you're sending
> to, it's just basic
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% David T-G muttered:
% > % how can i use close-hook and append-hook for tar.gz maildirs?
% >
% > You can't use append-hook; tar doesn't support appending (or at least not
% > in any form that I've ever seen actually work, contrary to the promises
At some point hitherto, Thomas Hurst hath spake thusly:
> * Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > At some point hitherto, Will Yardley hath spake thusly:
> > > our office mail machine is (unfortunately) linux with ext2, and i
> > > can attest to the fact that Maildir is pretty slow on
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> ...and then Michael Tatge said...
>
> > Quoting tar's man page:
> >
> > -r, --append append files to the end of an archive
> >
> > Works like charm.
>
> No kidding! I've never seen one work. What version of tar are you
> running?
It should work fine pro
At some point hitherto, Dave Price hath spake thusly:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:25:56PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > to the reader by a voder. Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim
> > quotations when replying ordinarily, when replying to a blind user it
> > becomes outright rud
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Theo Bierman wrote:
> Downloaded mutt-1.3.26, I have installed ncurses, slang and openssl. Then ran
>./configure --enable-imap --with-ssl and I'm getting an error as follows:
> checking for X509_new in -lcrypto... no
> configure: error: Unable to find SSL library
> I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 16:47
* Derek D. Martin said
> > Learn to use your screenreader better, and teach it to ignore or skip
> > over quote chars at the start of a new line.
>
> That's a pretty inconsiderate attitude to take, and doesn't solve t
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Theo Bierman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:42:59PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:32:18PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
> >
> > You need to install openssl-dev as well :)
> > (and ncurses-dev etc.)
> tried an apt-get install openssl-dev/
At some point hitherto, Nick Wilson hath spake thusly:
>
> * On 21-01-02 at 15:08
> * Preben Randhol said
>
> > Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
> > > people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
> > > we spend all our time worrying abo
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
> Certainly seems to be it although I'm having a little trouble getting it
> to work. I keep getting a 'error missing parameter in line 316' (first
> line of the code below)
> send-hook . "my_hdr Reply-To: Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> send-hook ~t "
At 04:50 AM 1/21/02 -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>
>Personally, I use maildir for all my 'active' mailboxes (read: the ones
>that mail gets delivered to and I read) because it's that much safer,
>easier and more efficient to alter, and roughly similar in speed to open.
>I use mbox for my archiv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 17:02
* Knute said
> You have your quotes in the wrong place. Try this:
> send-hook ~[EMAIL PROTECTED] "my_hdr Reply-To: Mutt-Users
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>
> They way you had it, was telling mutt to only look in
Hi Jeremy and others,
http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/mutt.html
is back up after a long hiatus. Sorry, but I was having trouble ssh-ing
to the server, and was too busy to figure it out :-(
Anyway, I will update it as and when something cool turns up. Meanwhile,
do send in links to apps you use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 16:58
* Derek D. Martin said
> > > Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
> > > > people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
> > > > we spend all our time worrying about every
Michael Elkins wrote:
>
> I'd be curious to get some feedback on my header caching patch for maildir
> folders (can be found at http://www.sigpipe.org:8080/mutt/).
ok a little more feedback. overall performance is a little zippier, but
if i leave a folder open and it receives messages, i get the
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (17:20) :
[snipped away several quotes that should have been cut down in the
previous post]
> And there's where we differ, my point was just that the line above where
> preben decided to quote me was rather important. Is that where the
> hostil
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (16:50) :
> I think the quote is taken a little out of context.
> Bandwidth's a bugger on mailing lists huh?
If you get about 1000 overquoted mails a day, it is.
Preben
--
() Join the worldwide campaign to protect fundamental human rights.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:35:15PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type.
> Here's italic. You can also do formatting -- you can
everything works for me (mutt 1.3.25) but the italic (i saw it
underlined) and justified text (which was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 17:41
* Preben Randhol said
> Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (17:20) :
>
> > And there's where we differ, my point was just that the line above where
> > preben decided to quote me was rather important. Is
At some point hitherto, Nick Wilson hath spake thusly:
> * On 21-01-02 at 16:58
> * Derek D. Martin said
>
> [Preben said:]
> > > > Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
> > > > > people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
> > > > > we spend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 18:07
* Derek D. Martin said
> If you're not following the thread, but you suddenly decide it's
> important, GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! You've already received the
> e-mails, so you should have them. If you don't, there's a
Andy --
...and then Andy Davidson said...
%
% At 04:50 AM 1/21/02 -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
% >
% >Personally, I use maildir for all my 'active' mailboxes (read: the ones
...
% >I use mbox for my archive mailboxes, because it's simpler and more compact
...
%
% I am in the process of conve
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% I agree, I've been agreeing all along, I'm not sure where I've picked up
% the 'Nick believes in over-quoting' badge. Not true, not true.
Come, Nick... Join me... Join the dark side and piss off everyone on
the mutt-users list... I am your father!
On 2002.01.21, in <20020121164625.GB2845@neuromancer>,
"giorgian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:35:15PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> > This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type.
> > Here's italic. You can also do formatting -- you can
Nick, et al --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * On 21-01-02 at 18:07
% * Derek D. Martin said
%
% > If you're not following the thread, but you suddenly decide it's
% > important, GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! You've already received the
% > e-mails, so you should have them. If you d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 18:27
* David T-G said
> % I agree, I've been agreeing all along, I'm not sure where I've picked up
> % the 'Nick believes in over-quoting' badge. Not true, not true.
>
> Come, Nick... Join me... Join the dark side and piss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Nick Wilson hath spake thusly:
>
> > If you're not following the thread, but you suddenly decide it's
> > important, GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! You've already received the
> > e-mails, so you should have them. If you don't
At some point hitherto, David T-G hath spake thusly:
> % Disagree, all this GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! nonsense is insulting.
> % Of course I've been reading the thread.
>
> I don't think the comment is directed at you; we know you've been
> reading. I think that the argument is that leaving
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * On 21-01-02 at 18:27
% * David T-G said
%
% > % the 'Nick believes in over-quoting' badge. Not true, not true.
% >
% > Come, Nick... Join me... Join the dark side and piss off everyone on
% > the mutt-users list... I am your father!
%
% Ha
* Cameron Simpson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> | > Anyone have ideas on how to get this to work? (NOTE: my home machine
> | > uses BASH and I'm using tcsh here at work if that makes any difference).
> |
> | That's the problem, the `for file in...` bit is run with whatever your
> | default shell i
Carl --
...and then Carl B. Constantine said...
%
% * Cameron Simpson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
% > | > Anyone have ideas on how to get this to work? (NOTE: my home machine
...
% > | That's the problem, the `for file in...` bit is run with whatever your
% > | default shell is, and that's won't
I wrote:
>% And it appears that the archive mailboxes *have* to be mboxes.
>% If I try to save a message to an existing maildir folder, mutt objects.
At 12:17 PM 1/21/02 -0500, David T-G wrote:
>Um, that shouldn't be the case. mutt will happily read and write mbox,
>Maildir, MMDF, and MH ma
"Derek D. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (18:05) :
> See above where Preben said this is not a minority problem. He was
> refering to the fact that it is a much BROADER problem than just one
> that affects minorities. Your comment is irrelevant to that argument.
> (Preben: pleas
On 14:45 21 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > That would still leave you with a truckload of repeated and mostly
| > irrelevent cruft, and not only for someone using a screenreader.
| >
| > Being able to skip quotes is no excuse not to trim them; not caring
| > whether people w
On 09:59 21 Jan 2002, Carl B. Constantine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| * Cameron Simpson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
| > | > Anyone have ideas on how to get this to work? (NOTE: my home machine
| > | > uses BASH and I'm using tcsh here at work if that makes any difference).
| > |
| > | That's the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 22:15
* Cameron Simpson said
> |
> | How do you tell if you are sending to a blind user?
>
> You can't. It's rude anyway. The amount of time you spend trimming stuff
Rude to do what? I don't follow you.
> to just the releva
So sprach »Benjamin Michotte« am 2002-01-20 um 19:33:10 +0100 :
> > What are the benefits of using one type over the other?
> opening a mbox with ± 7000 mails : less than 10 seconds.
> opening the same in Maildir : 3 minutes...
With mutt, I get the same kind of results. However, other MUAs behav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 22:29
* Nick Wilson said
Seeing as the sender of these next few lines didn't seem to want to send
them to the list. Here they are in all thier glory.
- ---
Funny that your reply on 'not trimming' was hardly (if at all
So sprach »Christian Ordig« am 2002-01-21 um 11:22:04 +0100 :
> opening times might be ... but think about updating times and the
Well, that's true, however, updating times aren't *that* important for
me. When I receive new mail, I let procmail sort it into appropriate
mailfiles; each list has g
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21-01-2002 18:56]:
[to Nick]
> You should change your quote char. I'd find '@' particularly annoying,
> and nobody is using it yet.
I've finally come to my senses; changed from '| ' to '> '. Now it's up
to that other pagan, David, to change ;)
--
René Clerc
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:32:49AM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
> > that I'm not getting the little 's' flag in the index and I don't seem
> > to be able to validate the signiture in anyway.
> Check out:
> Pcheck-traditional-pgp
Ok, and how about validating 'normal' (mime) signatures
* Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] on [21-01-02] wrote:
> Seeing as the sender of these next few lines didn't seem to want to send
> them to the list. Here they are in all thier glory.
I got this email, did you bounce it to mutt-users as well?
> I'm sorry guys but I feel that my messages are usua
* On 21-01-02 at 23:04
* René Clerc said
> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21-01-2002 18:56]:
>
> [to Nick]
> > You should change your quote char. I'd find '@' particularly annoying,
> > and nobody is using it yet.
Reckon there could be a reason there David. Hehe.
>
> I've finally com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 23:17
* Brian Foley said
>
> Some of the more extreme past members of this list would have blasted
> you out of the water for:
> a) using a two-line attribution at the top of all your quotes
Oops, I just thought it looked nea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 23:17
* Brian Foley said
> I got this email, did you bounce it to mutt-users as well?
Yes, sorry about that I thought it would just end up in the thread where
it belonged.
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45
* Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 17:17]:
> You think that'll happen? I like the @ idea but I think && or could be
> pretty bad too.
Oh no, that's not the worst. I've seen something like this on this list
in the past, *in jest*, in a similar thread:
This line is quoted text>
Mutt Users,
I'm trying to get a uniform look and feel to mutt on 3 machines, all running
Debian. Version is 1.3.25i.
The folder_format is set to the standard
"%F %-8.8u %-8.8g %d %8s %N %f"
on all three machines, yet the %N value only shows up on one of them
when I do c ? to the see the folder
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
> How do you tell if you are sending to a blind user?
Are you blind??
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
People who think MS-DOS and Windows are the slickest thing since
sliced butter should be forced to wear a sign stating "This mind
intentionally left blan
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
> * On 21-01-02 at 23:17 Brian Foley said
>
> > Some of the more extreme past members of this list would have
> > blasted you out of the water for: a) using a two-line attribution at
> > the top of all your quotes
>
> Oops, I just thought it looked neater as it w
Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21 Jan 2002 17:56 -0500]:
> I've seen something like this on this list in the past, *in
> jest*, in a similar thread:
>
>This line is quoted text>
>This line is quoted text>
Emacs and Pine both support per-message quote characters. I
think the idea is to
* Jonathan Irving ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 18:57]:
[...]
> Emacs and Pine both support per-message quote characters. I
> think the idea is to choose something that identifies the person,
> like:
Hehe, no no, I meant *that exact quote prefix* :-) It'd take me forever
to find the thread
Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21 Jan 2002 19:04 -0500]:
> * Jonathan Irving ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 18:57]:
> > Emacs and Pine both support per-message quote characters. I
> > think the idea is to choose something that identifies the person,
> > like:
>
> Hehe, no no, I meant *that
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:37:01PM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> running reiserfs.
well ... as tests showed, ReiserFS seems to be a _really_ slow
beast when it comes to read Maildir folders ... tried with Ext2/3?
Should be really faster.
--
Christian Ordig
Germany
On 13:53 13 Nov 2001, Andy Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Just a quick question:
| Is there a unix tool to convert something like this
| Subject: Para =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Carlos_Lavalle_?=
| into this
| Subject: Para José Carlos Lavalle
Procmail can be used for this:
: 0hc
On 23:05 09 Nov 2001, Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 2001-11-09 13:03:36 -0600, Peter Horst wrote:
| >Is anonymous checkout of the mutt CVS allowed? If so, what is the
| >procedure? I couldn't find a single reference to it in the list
| >archives, and the directions given at the
Alas! Brian Clark spake thus:
> I've used clients like TheBat! before that do it as you've pointed out
> below:
>
> > BC>This line is quoted text>
> > BC>This line is quoted text>
TheBat! is by far the best windows mail program I've seen (unless mutt
is available for windows and I don't
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
> Mutt Users,
> I'm trying to get a uniform look and feel to mutt on 3 machines, all running
> Debian. Version is 1.3.25i.
> The folder_format is set to the standard
> "%F %-8.8u %-8.8g %d %8s %N %f"
> on all three machines, yet the %N value only shows u
At some point hitherto, René Clerc hath spake thusly:
> I've finally come to my senses; changed from '| ' to '> '. Now it's up
> to that other pagan, David, to change ;)
And there was much rejoicing... ;-)
--
Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
At some point hitherto, Alexander Skwar hath spake thusly:
> The Maildir/mbox I tested, had 84.533 messages and about 321 MB. Opening
Eh? How does one have .533 messages in a mailbox? Perhaps fractional
messages are some feature of Maildir that I was unaware of?
Um... Oh, are you European?
I'm considering switching to IMAP. How good is Mutt as an IMAP
client? I'm currently just accessing local mbox files directly,
but I'd like to be able to access my mail from other machines.
Thanks,
Sam
_Replying to a message_
By: Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Users' List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On: Monday, January 21, 2002, 16:54:47 -0700
Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers
> Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
>
> > * On 21-01-02 at 23:17 Brian Foley said
> I
* Alexander Skwar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> With mutt, I get the same kind of results. However, other MUAs behave
> differently. For instance, when I did the testing, Evolution opened
> the same Maildir way faster than it handled the mbox file (which
> contained the same messages). mutt seem
No, the most annoying way is to indent using spaces, with Outlook style
replies (i.e, 2-3 lines right at the top of the message). Nice huh? :)
Several times I've found myself reading the "quoted" text thinking it's
the actual reply and wondering why it looks so familiar..
* Brian Clark ([EMAIL
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 20:05]:
> TheBat! is by far the best windows mail program I've seen (unless mutt
> is available for windows and I don't know about it). It sure beats
> Netscape Mail or LookOut, anyway.
Yes, it's a good client. I used SecureBat! with the iKey
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:26:55PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Derek D. Martin, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Um... Oh, are you European? I seem to recall that Europeans switch
> the meaning of '.' and ',' in numbers, as compared to us US types...
> So perhaps you meant eighty-four thousand five hu
Hi Cameron,
> On 13:53 13 Nov 2001, Andy Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Just a quick question:
> | Is there a unix tool to convert something like this
> | Subject: Para =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Carlos_Lavalle_?=
> | into this
> | Subject: Para José Carlos Lavalle
>
> Procmail can be used
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
