* Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] on [21-01-02] wrote: > Seeing as the sender of these next few lines didn't seem to want to send > them to the list. Here they are in all thier glory.
I got this email, did you bounce it to mutt-users as well? > I'm sorry guys but I feel that my messages are usually trimmed quite > thoughtfully. I have no reason to think that I'm doing anything wrong > and on that basis I will carry on as I am. Some of the more extreme past members of this list would have blasted you out of the water for: a) using a two-line attribution at the top of all your quotes b) using a non standard sig (not delimited with "-- " and more than 4 lines) I dont take issue with you for points a and b above, but it would make you emails "neater" (but that is a highly subjective term). On another note, I thank you for using "> " as your quote char. As regards quoting, just pare it down to the minimum, there are certain people on this list who go out of their way to quote and reply to even the most trivial words in a post. I think this is wrong, but you dont do that. Good man. Brian
