-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At some point hitherto, Nick Wilson hath spake thusly: > > > If you're not following the thread, but you suddenly decide it's > > important, GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! You've already received the > > e-mails, so you should have them. If you don't, there's always the > > archives. (mutt-users has archives, doesn't it?) > > > > > Is that where the hostile tone is coming from? > > > > Not hostile. Matter-of-fact, yes. Occasionally emphatic, yes. But > > never hostile. > > Disagree, all this GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! nonsense is insulting. > Of course I've been reading the thread.
Well, all I can say is, I think you're easily insulted if you find everything that's said with emphasis to be insulting. I add emphasis to indicate where the points of my arguments are, and to clarify or highlight certain things. I apologize if you find that insulting, but I think you're being over-sensitive. - -- Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] - --------------------------------------------- I prefer mail encrypted with PGP/GPG! GnuPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D Retrieve my public key at http://pgp.mit.edu Learn more about it at http://www.gnupg.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8TEzodjdlQoHP510RAuDKAJ9VHUdoFbDk8FawFBb0aTpHhd7FsgCgu35H f0DxgfiAyuXK1SAIdOAqrow= =L1V8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
