On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 08:11:18PM -0500, David T-G wrote: | Andreas -- | | ...and then Andreas Herceg said... | % | % OK, I did not know that X-Label is that common. Now I thought of just | % defining 'X-Coprija: coprija'. | | If you were triggering something in mutt instead of in procmail then it | might make sense, but you can tell mutt to act on arbitrary headers, too, | so X-Coprija works for you either way. And thanks :-) | | No, X-* is for defining your own headers, and there is no end to the list | of them :-)
That is exactly what I thought. | It's simply that mutt specifically recognizes X-Label: just like other | headers rather than ignoring them like other X-* vanity headers. And this I did not know. Thank you very much, everything's clear now again. Andreas Herceg -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
