Re: Working with mbox

Alas! Benjamin Smith spake thus: > The ways that script works is by outputting the muttrc to a tempory > file, the name of which is outputted for source, but what you can do is > just to put: > > `~/bin/do-whatever.sh` > > In the muttrc and mutt will interpret the output of the shell script > wi

Re: Working with mbox

Alas! David T-G spake thus: > % The .muttrc is fairly robust. You can put almost any shell command into > % backticks (``), and it will be as though the output of that command is > % actually in the .muttrc file. This is why mutt is so much better than > % pine :) > > Um, yeah; that's the *only*

Re: Add header for gpg key location

Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus: > Hi aqain. > Someone mentioned to me that you could add a header to mails giving the > location of your gpg public key. > > How is this done, or are there some useful docs on the topic? > I figure I just create a page from the export-key func on my site and > then p

Re: next/prev unread

Alas! David T-G spake thus: > % I wonder who it's actually encrypted to... > > Herself, of course. She's probably one of those people who goes around > talking to herself and so particular about her conversations that she > doesn't even want anyone to listen in ;-) I get it; trying to sign it w

Re: how make From: header dependent on recipient?

Alas! Tom Jones spake thus: > (2)when replying to a message, look at the delivered-to, to, cc, > etc headers. If one of them is in the list from (1), set the From: header > to that. Otherwise set the From: value to a default value. Look into send-hooks. The Fine Manual has everything you need to

Re: Color mails which are a reply to a mail from me?

At 20:34 -0500 05 Jan 2002, parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > wrote Aaron Schrab thusly... > > color index red default %~P > > aaron, i have been using similar syntax for the same purpose since mutt > v1.2.something (less than 1.2.4 for sure) created from

Re: "forward" flag message status?

Rene, et al -- ...and then Rene Clerc said... % % * René Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-01-2002 17:47]: % % | But, I recall that I have seen an X-Status set to "F" sometimes, in % | early versions of mutt. Does anybode know more on this? % % Dohh... this is for flagged messages... ;) *grin*

Re: Working with mbox

On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:30:35AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Alas! Benjamin Smith spake thus: > > The ways that script works is by outputting the muttrc to a tempory > > file, the name of which is outputted for source, but what you can do is > > just to put: > > > > `~/bin/do-whatever.sh`

Re: pgp hook patches

Dale, et al -- ...and then Dale Woolridge said... % % David noted that my recent pgp-hook extension patch conflicts with Hey, I'm famous! *grin* % Bardur Arantsson's pgp-hook-extension patch. Borrowing Bardur's % idea and following David's suggestion, I have implemented the same % idea follo

News reader that's good with mutt?

Hi everyone. I just wanted to know if there were any news readers that would compliment mutt nicely. I've just been looking at nn but it was way over my head to setup properly. Thanks -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com msg22379/pgp

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

Nick -- ...and then Nick Wilson said... % % Hi everyone. Hello again! % I just wanted to know if there were any news readers that would % compliment mutt nicely. Well, some might say slrn, since I hear that the keybindings are similar. Others might say mutt, since there are some mutt NNTP pa

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 12:29]: > Nick -- > > ...and then Nick Wilson said... > % > % Hi everyone. > > Hello again! > > > % I just wanted to know if there were any news readers that would > % compliment mutt nicely. > > Well, some might say slrn, since I hear that the keybind

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

Nick -- ...and then Nick Wilson said... % % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 12:29]: % > % > ...and then Nick Wilson said... % > % % > % I just wanted to know if there were any news readers that would % > % compliment mutt nicely. % > % > Well, some might say slrn, since I hear that th

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

Hi, * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 12:55]: >You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even >better ;-) Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard to read for no good reasons. Thorsten -- Question Authority!

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

Thorsten -- ...and then Thorsten Haude said... % % Hi, % % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 12:55]: % >You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even % >better ;-) % Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard % to read for no good reaso

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 14:22]: > Hi, > > * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 12:55]: > >You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even > >better ;-) > Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard > to read for no good rea

multipart/alternative and text/html

How can I make mutt able to display text/html attachments inline, WITHOUT making it pick text/html (instead of text/plain) when the original message was sent as multipart/alternative? I find the text/html versions to be formatted worse. This is my .mailcap for text/html: text/html; lynx %s; name

Re: multipart/alternative and text/html

On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:21:25PM +0700, budsz wrote: > >How can I make mutt able to display text/html attachments inline, WITHOUT > >making it pick text/html (instead of text/plain) when the original message > >was sent as multipart/alternative? I find the text/html versions to be > >formatted w

Patch for mutt with Mixmaster 2.9beta32

Hi. When I was setting up Mixmaster with mutt, I didn't find the recommended version of Mixmaster, so I tried Mixmaster 2.9beta32. It didn't quite work, but I figured out it was because Mixmaster now wanted commas between the remailers in the command line. I haven't bothered researching when th

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

Moin, * Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 14:26]: >* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 14:22]: >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 12:55]: >> >You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even >> >better ;-) >> Yeah, and we like totally unlike anythi

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 15:40]: > Moin, > > * Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 14:26]: > >* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 14:22]: > >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 12:55]: > >> >You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it

Re: Patch for mutt with Mixmaster 2.9beta32

On Sun, 06 Jan 2002, Ken Wahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought the issue with the newer versions of Mixmaster was that they > didn't accept the -T switch to view remailer lists? 2 nights ago I > spent hours on the mutt-users mail archive reading anything that had to > do with Mixmaster. Mi

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

On 2002-01-06 15:45:11 +0100, Nick Wilson wrote: > > IMHO you should make reasonable bits out of the mail you answer and > > write your answer in each context. The above *is* the gospel WRT answering emails! :-) > > There is no drug known to man which becomes safer when its > > production and di

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

* Morten Liebach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 16:19]: > On 2002-01-06 15:45:11 +0100, Nick Wilson wrote: > > > IMHO you should make reasonable bits out of the mail you answer and > > > write your answer in each context. > > The above *is* the gospel WRT answering emails! :-) > > > > There is no d

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 03:45:11PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote: > * Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 15:40]: > > Moin, > > > > * Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 14:26]: > > >* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 14:22]: > > >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 12:5

Re: how make From: header dependent on recipient?

[setting From: in replies depending on which of my addresses was a rcpt of the original mail] > Sure. Set 'alternates' to a regular expression that describes all the > addresses that are yours. This can be a simple list with the elements > separated by '|'. Then set 'reverse_name'. See the m

New mail not being flagged as new.

Ahoy. Typicall I use mutt in an IMAP setting and am just now using it at home (they finally removed the chain and ball from my cubicle). I'm using fetchmail to yank the mail and procmail to process it. That part is going quite well. I see mail accretion in my defined folders. I have defined i

Searching through headers? (Message-ID)

Hello, I'd like to search for a header, specifically, the Message-ID header, but haven't found a way to do that in Mutt yet. Do you know how? Thanks, Carlos. -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ to hell with icq, use jabber! (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK?

tagging in browser

/usr/local/share/doc/mutt/html/manual-6.html says: %t * if the file is tagged, blank otherwise when I press '?' in the browser, I see this: t tag-entry tag the current entry but it doesn't work: (hit 't') -- Mutt: Mailboxes [11] Tagging is not supported. This is mutt-1.

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

Moin, * Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 15:45]: >Problem is that I find that format more confusing and prefer to only >quote if the point I refer to _really_ needs it. (like it's a really >long mail) Let's take this example: - - - Schnipp - - - > There is no drug known to man which beco

Re: News reader that's good with mutt?

Moin, * Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 16:21]: >> Have a nice day >I'll take it under consideration! Well, you should at least try! Thorsten -- They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin

Re: Searching through headers? (Message-ID)

* Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-06 15:04]: > Hello, > > I'd like to search for a header, specifically, the Message-ID header, > but haven't found a way to do that in Mutt yet. Do you know how? > > Thanks, > Carlos. > http://mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.2 ~h EXPR

1.3.25 builds with S-LANG - PuTTy colors now munged

I finally got 1.3.25 built on a FreeBSD 4.4 box. I had previously been running 1.3.22. After installing from the port, colors are no longer working properly using Putty. By not working I mean that it seems the foreground and background colors are reversed in some cases. Text that was previously g

Re: how make From: header dependent on recipient?

On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:04:25PM +, Tom Jones wrote: > [setting From: in replies depending on which of my addresses was a > rcpt of the original mail] > > > Sure. Set 'alternates' to a regular expression that describes all the > > addresses that are yours. This can be a simple list with

Re: multipart/alternative and text/html

Philip -- ...and then Philip Mak said... % % How can I make mutt able to display text/html attachments inline, WITHOUT % making it pick text/html (instead of text/plain) when the original message % was sent as multipart/alternative? I find the text/html versions to be % formatted worse. Look in

Re: 1.3.25 builds with S-LANG - PuTTy colors now munged

On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:18:19PM -0500, Jack Baty wrote: > Now, before I go around messing with trying to go back to using ncurses, I'd > like to know if anyone knows if there's a way to fix the color issue while > still using slang, since that seems to now be "recommended". I know nothing no

Re: multipart/alternative and text/html

On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:23:36PM -0500, David T-G wrote: | Philip -- | | ...and then Philip Mak said... | % | % How can I make mutt able to display text/html attachments inline, WITHOUT | % making it pick text/html (instead of text/plain) when the original message | % was sent as multipart/alt

Re: how make From: header dependent on recipient?

* Tom Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-06 00:53]: > > (2)when replying to a message, look at the delivered-to, to, cc, > etc headers. If one of them is in the list from (1), set the From: header > to that. Otherwise set the From: value to a default value. > I think you can use "message-hook"

Re: pgp hook patches

On 6-Jan-2002 06:12 David T-G wrote: | | So does your patch include Bardur's functionality and then go farther, or | do the two complement each other? My patch should work as a replacement as it includes all the functionality of Bardur's patch, albeit with slightly different syntax.

Re: multipart/alternative and text/html

* Nuno Teixeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-06 22:06]: > > Can I use the same config with w3m? > Yes, you can. This is my mailcap entry: #text/html; w3m %s; nametemplate=%s.html text/html; w3m -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput -- Eunjea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: sentmail and gpg

On Samstag, 05. Jan. 2002 at 23:22:42, David Clarke wrote: > On Sat, 05 Jan 2002, Markus Boelter wrote: > > How is it possible to store the sent-mail in sent-mail-folder (and > > enrypt it with my own key)? > > > Howdy, > Simply done with the "encrypt-to" option for gnupg. Just add > "encr

Mutt, SuSE & Gnupg

Hi List, I am currently using: Mutt 1.3.22.1i Vim 6.0av SuSE 7.1 Gnupg 1.0.6 The Problem: When emailing, after I chose b(oth) sign/encrypt I type "y" to mail, enter my passphrase and in konsole I get the following: gpg: A89A2371--: skipped: public key not found. Press any key to continue. If I t

What's the '*' symbol in thread tree?

I found the star in ACS display of thread tree but I can not find explanation in manual. What does it mean? Something... | +-*> charlie

Re: What's the '*' symbol in thread tree?

Charles Jie wrote: > I found the star in ACS display of thread tree but I can not find > explanation in manual. What does it mean? it means that mutt is _guessing_ that the threads are related because of the subject line, and not because of 'In-Reply-To' headers and such. you can turn off this

Re: utf-8 display problem index vs. pager

On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 08:30:05PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 Stephan Seitz spewed into the ether: > [-- snip --] > > PS: How do you call w3m to display html mails? > > > text/html; w3m -T text/html %s > > > You could also add a 'copiousoutput' at the en

?'s and hide_missing

Is there any way to get the Mutt-1.3.24i threading behavior back? It looks like it changed again in Mutt-1.3.25i. Specifically, I like seeing the ?'s, but only enough to give me context. Today, with hide_missing set, I see something like this ?-?-?-?-?-?-?->Re: foo `-?->Re: foo The

failed build

i'm giving another go at getting the beta mutt to compile on an outdated linux machine (for which i don't have root access). i'm not sure what distribution it is, although i'd guess redhat; kernel is really old (2.0.36). i have my own ncurses and libiconv installed in my home directory. i'm con

Re: How to place a request of receipt for an outgoing mail?

Hi, Erika, It looks your postman is specailly friendly to you and you never have to sign a receipt for a registered snail mail. (Or you just reject them all. :) I think such function or mechanism USEFUL because some people, including me, need it from time to time. And I believe most of people w

Re: ?'s and hide_missing

On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:43:27PM -0500, Samuel Padgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any way to get the Mutt-1.3.24i threading behavior back? > It looks like it changed again in Mutt-1.3.25i. Specifically, I > like seeing the ?'s, but only enough to give me context. Today, > with hide_

New vs. Deleted flags

Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around that? Thanks. -Ken

Re: New vs. Deleted flags

Previously, Ken Weingold wrote: % Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the % status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around % that? Well, it sort of is technically new as you haven't read it yet. The way around it would be something like this: macr

Re: New vs. Deleted flags

On Sun, Jan 6, 2002, Shawn D. McPeek wrote: > Previously, Ken Weingold wrote: > % Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the > % status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around > % that? > > Well, it sort of is technically new as you haven't read it ye

Re: sentmail and gpg

On Mon, 07 Jan 2002, Michael Wagner wrote: > must I put my "pub key-id" or my "sub key-id" in ~/.gnupg/options? I'm > not working much with gpg, so I don't no it. I make > The either will work, although you will probably get a message about it changing to the public key if you choose the sub ke

Re: New vs. Deleted flags

At 02:15 -0500 07 Jan 2002, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > macro index d N "delete the current >entry" That won't work properly on the last message in a mailbox. > since I have $resolve set to yes. :) It would probably be a better idea to have the macro turn off $resolve at the begi

Re: New vs. Deleted flags

Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus: > > macro index d N "delete the current entry" ... > macro index d N "delete the current >entry" Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message that isn't new? ;) -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "I'm glad I'm not bisexual. I coul

Re: New vs. Deleted flags

On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > > macro index d N "delete the >current entry" > > Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message > that isn't new? ;) No, N just seems to clear the 'N' flag if it exists. If not, it does nothing, other than preceding to t

Re: New vs. Deleted flags

At 00:47 -0700 07 Jan 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus: > > macro index d N "delete the >current entry" > > Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message > that isn't new? ;) No, clear-flag does exactly that, it clears f

Re: New vs. Deleted flags

Previously, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: % Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus: % > > macro index d N "delete the current entry" % ... % > macro index d N "delete the current entry" % % Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message % that isn't new? ;) No, the clear flag just cle

Re: New vs. Deleted flags

On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote: > It would probably be a better idea to have the macro turn off $resolve > at the beginning then turn it back on before doing the actual deletion. True. How do I do this, then? I have tried to few things, but nothing seems to work correctly. Thanks.