Hi, Erika, It looks your postman is specailly friendly to you and you never have to sign a receipt for a registered snail mail. (Or you just reject them all. :)
I think such function or mechanism USEFUL because some people, including me, need it from time to time. And I believe most of people won't abuse it and annoy others. It could be thought more positively. best, charlie On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 06:28:05PM +0100, Erika Pacholleck wrote: > [03.01.02 11:30 +0800] Charles Jie <-- : > > What I want to get is the RECIPIENT's answering (eg. thru a dialog box), > > not of the system. > > > > The value of this mechanism is that the recipient is automatically > > prompted for a receipt, and I can get noticed as soon as possible when > > he/she is back or available - avoiding many calls in vain. > > How do you want to prompt at the recipients side? You might get from > my headers my MUA (if I do not forbid to send it) but besides this > maybe-information you don't know anything, not the system I am running > nore the "layout". Or do you expect every MUA to include a mechanism > to interupt with prompting? And what, just in case M$ has already > thought of this, I click it away? Do you expect to stop the whole > system until the recipient has sent out the receipt? > > If it is that important mail might not be the right choice at all. > -- > Erika Pacholleck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
