* Morten Liebach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 16:19]: > On 2002-01-06 15:45:11 +0100, Nick Wilson wrote: > > > IMHO you should make reasonable bits out of the mail you answer and > > > write your answer in each context. > > The above *is* the gospel WRT answering emails! :-) > > > > There is no drug known to man which becomes safer when its > > > production and distribution are handed over to criminals. > > > > Problem is that I find that format more confusing and prefer to only > > quote if the point I refer to _really_ needs it. (like it's a really > > long mail) > > For example I first thought you were commenting on Thorsten's quite nice > .sig, but you were not, this is confusing IMHO. > > > I take it that this topic is much debated? > > Yes! > > > Or do I constitute a minority? :) > > Yes! (I hope ;-) > > Have a nice day > Morten
I'll take it under consideration! -- Nick Wilson Tel: +45 3325 0688 Fax: +45 3325 0677 Web: www.explodingnet.com
msg22393/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
