Dale, et al -- ...and then Dale Woolridge said... % % David noted that my recent pgp-hook extension patch conflicts with
Hey, I'm famous! *grin* % Bardur Arantsson's pgp-hook-extension patch. Borrowing Bardur's % idea and following David's suggestion, I have implemented the same % idea following the existing hook model more closely. You can find % the new patch at http://www.woolridge.org/mutt/. Bardur's patch Thanks a bunch! I'm [finally] trying it out in the cocktail now. % extended pgp-hook from % pgp-hook <pattern> <keyID> % to % pgp-hook <pattern> <keyID_1> [, <keyID_2>] ... % % My patch, aside from the pgp_confirmhook/pgp_autokeyselect support, % now allows multiple pgp-hook's with the same pattern, e.g.: % pgp-hook <pattern> <keyID_1> % pgp-hook <pattern> <keyID_2> % ... So does your patch include Bardur's functionality and then go farther, or do the two complement each other? % -- % -Dale :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg22378/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
