* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 15:40]: > Moin, > > * Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 14:26]: > >* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 14:22]: > >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-06 12:55]: > >> >You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even > >> >better ;-) > >> Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard > >> to read for no good reasons. > >So does that mean you are for 'replying in context' or against? > >I couldn't understand your sentence. > Sorry to confuse you, I was only referring to an old quarrel with > David. > > IMHO you should make reasonable bits out of the mail you answer and > write your answer in each context. > > Thorsten > -- > There is no drug known to man which becomes safer when its > production and distribution are handed over to criminals.
Problem is that I find that format more confusing and prefer to only quote if the point I refer to _really_ needs it. (like it's a really long mail) I take it that this topic is much debated? Or do I constitute a minority? :) -- Nick Wilson Tel: +45 3325 0688 Fax: +45 3325 0677 Web: www.explodingnet.com
msg22390/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
