On 19 May 2025 14:23 -0700, from mutt-us...@veggiechinese.net (Will Yardley):
> As best I understand, M-F-T is a draft from 1997 that expired in
> 1998(?), never made progress towards becoming a standard (and is only
> implemented by a handful of other clients other than Mutt, none of which
> are s
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 12:43:36PM +, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> On 25 Sep 2024 12:11 +0100, from c...@isbd.net (Chris Green):
> >> So, next question (which replaces the first one), how can I change a
> >> To: header dependent on the contents of the To: header?
> >>
On 25 Sep 2024 12:11 +0100, from c...@isbd.net (Chris Green):
>> So, next question (which replaces the first one), how can I change a
>> To: header dependent on the contents of the To: header?
>>
>> What I am trying to do is to change the destination address when I get
&g
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 06:25:57PM +0800, "Kevin J. McCarthy"
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 03:53:09PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
> > I don't have any "lists" commands. I do have a "subscribe" command
> > which refers to mailing lists by their aliases. One of the aliases
> > is "debian"
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 03:53:09PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
I don't have any "lists" commands. I do have a "subscribe" command
which refers to mailing lists by their aliases. One of the aliases
is "debian" and the email address in question does contain "+debian"
but that shouldn't matter.
Hi,
Someone recently emailed me. Technically it was a reply to an
old email of mine. Since then, a few emails have gone back and
forth between us. All of my outgoing mails to this one address
have had a Mail-Followup-To header added. I have no idea why.
The address isn't mentioned i
Is there any way to 'see' header values from send-hook?
I want to be able to manipulate the To: address in an external program
so I want to do something like:-
send-hook 'barges.org/discussion-forum' 'source myscript.sh $to|'
I.e. I want the To: address fed into myscript.sh.
--
Chris Gree
Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:47:31PM +0100, Jens Mueller wrote:
> > I was looking for a way to set the From header based on the To header
> > when replying in mutt.
>
> Check out $reverse_name and also $reverse_realname. It requires the To or
>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:47:31PM +0100, Jens Mueller wrote:
I was looking for a way to set the From header based on the To header
when replying in mutt.
Check out $reverse_name and also $reverse_realname. It requires the To
or Cc address to match an entry in your alternates list
Hi,
I have a mail account with aliased mail addresses, i.e., mails sent to
me.someth...@example.com, me.somethinge...@example.com, etc. are
delivered to m...@example.com. The To header indicates which alias an
email was sent to, e.g, me.someth...@example.com.
I was looking for a way to set the
* Oliver Graute [05-06-17 07:55]:
> Hello list,
>
> In the compose window I have an empty "Reply-To:" Header. Is this a
> mandatory Header Field? How can I remove these Header entry? or should I
> fill it out with my mail address from the "From" field?
man
Hello list,
In the compose window I have an empty "Reply-To:" Header. Is this a
mandatory Header Field? How can I remove these Header entry? or should I
fill it out with my mail address from the "From" field?
A mail partner is complaining about it and saied "Your reply-t
El día Friday, June 03, 2016 a las 06:05:11PM -0300, Marcelo Laia escribió:
> > And btw: try to break your lines between 72 and 80 chars.
>
> Yes! I do! I use mutt + vi. So, they do that for me. Are there some problems
> with your friend terminals?
No, you do not as yu could proof:
$ grep '^Yes
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă
wrote:
> On 3-06-2016, at 10h 52'54", Christian Brabandt wrote about "Re: Convert
> ascii UTF8 code (in mutt "to:" header) to real UTF8"
>>
>> An alternative might be qprint (package qprint)
On 03/06/16 at 10:52pm, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Friday, June 03, 2016 a las 05:45:04PM -0300, Marcelo Laia escribió:
>
> > Yes, I do! I read all messages in the thread and in there isn't a friend
> > solution! If there are, please, point me out.
>
> I have no clue about what for you is a
El día Friday, June 03, 2016 a las 05:45:04PM -0300, Marcelo Laia escribió:
> Yes, I do! I read all messages in the thread and in there isn't a friend
> solution! If there are, please, point me out.
I have no clue about what for you is a 'friend solution'. In the thread
there are some useful sol
On 03/06/16 at 09:14pm, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Friday, June 03, 2016 a las 08:49:44AM -0300, Marcelo Laia escribió:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have the same problem here. If you found a solution, please, share it.
>
> Please read / glance through the entire thread and do not just TOP POST on
>
El día Friday, June 03, 2016 a las 08:49:44AM -0300, Marcelo Laia escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I have the same problem here. If you found a solution, please, share it.
Please read / glance through the entire thread and do not just TOP POST on the
first
message in the thread.
matthias
--
Matth
Hi,
I have the same problem here. If you found a solution, please, share it.
Marcelo
On 03/06/16 at 01:35am, Xu Wang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I pipe email I see the following header:
>
> To: Jeri =?utf-8?Q?Ker=C4=B1ko?=
>
> I would like to get the name with the UTF8 character, without speci
El día Friday, June 03, 2016 a las 08:13:00PM +1000, Erik Christiansen escribió:
> > $ fgrep -A1 MASTER_SITES ports-r414411/*/metamail/Makefile
> > MASTER_SITES= http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/mail/metamail/ \
> > ftp://ftp.research.telcordia.com/pub/nsb/
> >
> > I don't know if t
On 3-06-2016, at 10h 52'54", Christian Brabandt wrote about "Re: Convert ascii
UTF8 code (in mutt "to:" header) to real UTF8"
>
> An alternative might be qprint (package qprint)
>
Yes, qprint should do it:
# echo "Ker=C4=B1ko" | qprint -d
On 03.06.16 10:32, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I'm on FreeBSD and do compile all from sources (the so called ports
> collection). mmencode comes from:
>
> $ which mmencode
> /usr/local/bin/mmencode
> $ pkg which /usr/local/bin/mmencode
> /usr/local/bin/mmencode was installed by package metamail-2.7_11
On 03.06.16 10:52, Christian Brabandt wrote:
>
> An alternative might be qprint (package qprint)
Indeedy! :-)
Thank you Christian. I've made a note of that.
(Stuff from many years ago now sticks better than new stuff. :(
Regards,
Erik
Hi Erik!
On Fr, 03 Jun 2016, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 03.06.16 08:45, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > $ echo 'Ker=C4=B1ko' | mmencode -u -q
> > Kerıko
> > $ echo 'Ker=C4=B1ko' | mmencode -u -q | od -tx1
> > 0004b 65 72 c4 b1 6b 6f 0a
> > 010
>
>
El d�a Friday, June 03, 2016 a las 05:52:36PM +1000, Erik Christiansen escribi�:
> On 03.06.16 08:45, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > $ echo 'Ker=C4=B1ko' | mmencode -u -q
> > Kerıko
> > $ echo 'Ker=C4=B1ko' | mmencode -u -q | od -tx1
> > 0004b 65 72 c4 b1 6b 6f 0a
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 05:52:36PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 03.06.16 08:45, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > $ echo 'Ker=C4=B1ko' | mmencode -u -q
> > Kerıko
> > $ echo 'Ker=C4=B1ko' | mmencode -u -q | od -tx1
> > 0004b 65 72 c4 b1 6b 6f 0a
> > 00
On 03.06.16 08:45, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> $ echo 'Ker=C4=B1ko' | mmencode -u -q
> Kerıko
> $ echo 'Ker=C4=B1ko' | mmencode -u -q | od -tx1
> 0004b 65 72 c4 b1 6b 6f 0a
> 010
Matthias, mmencode looks very useful, but I'm not able to find it on my
El día Friday, June 03, 2016 a las 01:35:40AM -0400, Xu Wang escribió:
> Hello,
>
> When I pipe email I see the following header:
>
> To: Jeri =?utf-8?Q?Ker=C4=B1ko?=
>
> I would like to get the name with the UTF8 character, without special
> code, which in this case is: Jeri Kerıko (note that
Hello,
When I pipe email I see the following header:
To: Jeri =?utf-8?Q?Ker=C4=B1ko?=
I would like to get the name with the UTF8 character, without special
code, which in this case is: Jeri Kerıko (note that the last i has no
dot)
Is there a Linux command that can convert the special code to ac
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 02:47:55PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > Why didn't I see those were .muttrc
> > entries! My only remaining question is since these settings aren't shown
> > in .muttrc, and since prior to ~16 August the problem didn't exist, what
> > changed
Robert Holtzman wrote:
> Why didn't I see those were .muttrc
> entries! My only remaining question is since these settings aren't shown
> in .muttrc, and since prior to ~16 August the problem didn't exist, what
> changed and why.
Most likely, it was a typo in your /etc/passwd file. Mutt will rea
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:47:01PM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 02:31:06PM -0700, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 03:46:26PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > > Robert Holtzm wrote:
> > > > What file does mutt source to genera
On Sep 15, 2013 at 02:31 PM -0700, Robert Holtzm wrote:
You lost me. Use_from is set but I have no idea what or where $from is.
The way you use it it sounds like a file but I can't find it. The same
with $realname which only exists in .muttrc in connection with a
non-existent macro.
I set mine
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 02:31:06PM -0700, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 03:46:26PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > Robert Holtzm wrote:
> > > What file does mutt source to generate the TO: header? Compare the one
> > > in this post to the last name
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 03:46:26PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Robert Holtzm wrote:
> > What file does mutt source to generate the TO: header? Compare the one
> > in this post to the last name in the sig. It appears that the problem
> > started around Aug 16 as far as I
Robert Holtzm wrote:
> What file does mutt source to generate the TO: header? Compare the one
> in this post to the last name in the sig. It appears that the problem
> started around Aug 16 as far as I can tell. Going back to earlier posts
> in my outbox it's correct.
I believe
What file does mutt source to generate the TO: header? Compare the one
in this post to the last name in the sig. It appears that the problem
started around Aug 16 as far as I can tell. Going back to earlier posts
in my outbox it's correct.
I'm running wheezy w/ mutt 1.5.21-6.2 and xfc
m: address for lists as I want it to.
So, after failing with more complex send-hook commands for setting the
To: address I just did:-
send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Chris Green '
send-hook ~l 'my_hdr From: Chris Green '
send-hook ~l 'my_hdr To: ch...@halon.org.
onfig there (should it be "@gary..."?),
>>that mutt knows the mailing list is on my domain and therefore decides
>>not to generate a header (i.e. my test case is wrong) or if it is a bug.
>
> The problem is your alternates setting states that any address at your
>
des
not to generate a header (i.e. my test case is wrong) or if it is a bug.
The problem is your alternates setting states that any address at your domain
is an alias for your personal address. This is probably interferring with the
list detection code. When generating the Mail-Followup-To hea
Christian Ebert writes:
> * Gary on Sunday, May 02, 2010 at 16:28:59 +0200
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:07:13AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
>>> The idea is to create a rc file and set of actions that demonstrate the
>>> problem. It could be just a bogus mailing list address if you prefer.
>>
>>
* Gary on Sunday, May 02, 2010 at 16:28:59 +0200
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:07:13AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
>> The idea is to create a rc file and set of actions that demonstrate the
>> problem. It could be just a bogus mailing list address if you prefer.
>
> Okay. I have cut it down as mu
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:07:13AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:46:23PM +0200, Gary wrote:
> >>If you can produce a test muttrc and a test email message that exhibit the
> >>problem
> >
> >Well, it applies to outgoing email, so the latter doesn't really apply,
> >but I
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:46:23PM +0200, Gary wrote:
If you can produce a test muttrc and a test email message that exhibit the
problem
Well, it applies to outgoing email, so the latter doesn't really apply,
but I can send my muttrc stripped of comments privately, or somewhat
more stripped to
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:14:35PM +0200, Gary wrote:
Please let me know what you want and I will try to.
If you can produce a test muttrc and a test email message that exhibit the
problem, that would be helping for debugging. Typically you want something
standalone, so you will invoke it th
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:42:58PM +0200, Gary wrote:
I may be wrong, but despite "set followup_to=yes" in my config file, and
lists + subscribe entries, mutt doesn't seem to be generating this
header correctly. I've got some extra ones being created by my_hdr, but
I don't think that could be int
* hsan...@gmail.com [2010-01-15 23:57]:
>A few weeks ago everytime I replied a message by pressing r on the index or
>pager views the To: header field was correctly set to the same address in the
>original message From: header.
>
>Now everytime I reply an email the To: header in t
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:10:12AM +0100, Kirill Miazine wrote:
> * Horacio Sanson [2010-01-15 10:40]:
> >
> >A few weeks ago everytime I replied a message by pressing r on the index or
> >pager views the To: header field was correctly set to the same address in the
>
* Horacio Sanson [2010-01-15 10:40]:
A few weeks ago everytime I replied a message by pressing r on the index or
pager views the To: header field was correctly set to the same address in the
original message From: header.
Now everytime I reply an email the To: header in the reply is set to the
A few weeks ago everytime I replied a message by pressing r on the index or
pager views the To: header field was correctly set to the same address in the
original message From: header.
Now everytime I reply an email the To: header in the reply is set to the To:
header of the original message
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 02:12:35PM +0200, Marco Giusti wrote:
[cut]
>having some tests i got strange behavior. here the steps i followed:
>
>1. send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>2. send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>3. send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[cut]
attached the log with -d 5 of the a
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 02:28:20PM +, Michael Kjorling wrote:
>On 22 May 2008 14:24 +, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Kjorling):
>> On 22 May 2008 14:12 +0200, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco Giusti):
>>> send-hook .*unibo\.it 'set sendmail="~/bin/msmtpQ -a hermes"; \
>>>
On 22 May 2008 14:24 +, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Kjorling):
> On 22 May 2008 14:12 +0200, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco Giusti):
>> send-hook .*unibo\.it 'set sendmail="~/bin/msmtpQ -a hermes"; \
>>set from = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
On 22 May 2008 14:12 +0200, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco Giusti):
> send-hook .*unibo\.it 'set sendmail="~/bin/msmtpQ -a hermes"; \
>set from = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
|
You probably want a semicolon here
ciao! i got two account to send email: my main main account and the
university account which i use to communicate to professors and in
general to all university-related people. the following is my
configuration which sometime works and sometime not
unhook send-hook
unhook send2-hook
s
Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> Yes, BUT mutt does *not* use those headers to match against the
> lists/subscribed lists for the purposes of ~l and ~u pattern
> matching. Check out pattern.c, line 1172; all it uses is h->env->to
> and h->env->cc. h->env->to is built (in parse.c) from To and
> Apparently-To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, June 20 at 03:03 PM, quoth Todd Zullinger:
>Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> Now, it's probably fair criticism if you want to say that mutt
>> should also check List-Post and/or List-ID headers (if they exist),
>> but for good or ill, it does not c
Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> Now, it's probably fair criticism if you want to say that mutt
> should also check List-Post and/or List-ID headers (if they exist),
> but for good or ill, it does not currently (file a bug report).
> Other than that, though, how do you think mutt *should* identify
> messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, June 20 at 01:31 PM, quoth Omari Norman:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 07:04:43AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> Generally, the lists and subscribe commands just add addresses to
>> an internal list. This list is then consulted for several th
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 07:04:43AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> Generally, the lists and subscribe commands just add addresses to an
> internal list. This list is then consulted for several things. For
> example, it is used for the ~l pattern (which, according to the
> manual, matches "messages
re also used for things like 'list-reply', which is described in
the documentation like this:
Reply to the current or tagged message(s) by extracting any
addresses which match the regular expressions given by the lists
or subscribe commands, but also honor any Mail-Followup
ages and change their To: header if it is from a list; is there a
better way to deal with this?
Thanks,
Omari
--
A symphony of smiles.
* Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-17 14:06]:
> I use diferent email addresses to subscribe to diferent lists,
> ejg-mutt for mutt-users and ejg-qmail for qmail lists. I use ejg too.
> Is the following alternetes set appropriately for my scenario?
>
> set alternates="^ejg.*(-mutt|-qm
Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
>
> I'm running mutt 1.3.28 and i have set followup_to honor_followup_to.
> I want to configure mutt to set mail-followup-to header just only with the
> address of the mailing list i'm posting to, and not with my address.
> Is there any way to do
Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> set alternates appropriately and configure the lists you are subscribed to
> with the subscribe command. If you list-reply to a mailinglist mail
> which has a mft header mutt will only reply to the adresses in the mft
> header.
>
> HTH,
thanks, it wo
Eduardo Gargiulo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> I'm running mutt 1.3.28 and i have set followup_to honor_followup_to.
Good. :)
> I want to configure mutt to set mail-followup-to header just only with the
> address of the mailing list i'm posting to, and not with my address.
TED], B, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm... Sounds like it might be more a job for sed than for formail,
actually.
%
% (and similarly if the address appeared in the "To:" header)
Right. That's the same simple case, though.
%
%
% --
% Eugene Lee
% [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Goo
TED], B, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(and similarly if the address appeared in the "To:" header)
--
Eugene Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eugene --
...and then Eugene Lee said...
%
% On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:00:40PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
% :
% : Eugene Lee wrote:
% : >
...
% : > are fine and can be left alone. I'm guessing a send-hook will work, but
% : > I haven't been able to divinate the right combination.
% :
% :
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:00:40PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
:
: Eugene Lee wrote:
: >
: > I'd like to change this slightly. On messages sent to the mailing list
: > via the alternate address B, I want 'L' to generate the headers using
: > the main address A, i.e. "To: ". Messages sent to t
Dean --
First, I must note that you shouldn't just reply to any old message and
start a new thread. This has nothing to do with hooks or even any prior
musings.
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Hi all
Hello!
%
% I have just got GNUPG working with Mutt, and since I am still new to
Eugene Lee wrote:
> I'd like to change this slightly. On messages sent to the mailing list
> via the alternate address B, I want 'L' to generate the headers using
> the main address A, i.e. "To: ". Messages sent to the main address A
> are fine and can be left alone. I'm guessing a send-hook wi
I'm on a mailing list with an email address of A. The same mailing list
also works with an alternate email address of B. Both addresses are
listed in the "lists" command. And doing 'L' (list-reply) generates the
appropriate "To: " or "To: " headers.
I'd like to change this slightly. On messag
On Apr 03, jennyw [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:53:29PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> > Hmmm... That certainly sounds like the index. Does your help screen
> > look like
>
> Yes, I found it. I was just confused about the search function ... I
> expected it to work like l
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:53:29PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Hmmm... That certainly sounds like the index. Does your help screen
> look like
Yes, I found it. I was just confused about the search function ... I
expected it to work like less where it'd take you to the next occurrence
if you se
Jen --
...and then jennyw said...
%
% On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:47:26AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > ...and then jennyw said...
% > %
% > % Thanks to everyone for the help!
% >
% > That's why we're here :-)
%
% That's good to know!
*grin*
%
% > in the right context, though; when reading a
* Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-03-02 12:20]:
> 03-Apr-02 at 09:08, jennyw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > When I hit ? when it's listing all the messages, it doesn't show l for
> > limit. It does show the key binding for showing the active limit, though.
> > Do I just have a weird version
03-Apr-02 at 09:08, jennyw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> When I hit ? when it's listing all the messages, it doesn't show l for
> limit. It does show the key binding for showing the active limit, though.
> Do I just have a weird version? I'm using the one that's packaged for
> Debian.
Are you
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:47:26AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then jennyw said...
> %
> % Thanks to everyone for the help!
>
> That's why we're here :-)
That's good to know!
> I don't know which help you're using, but pressing the '?' brings up a
> help screen listing every function and
Jenny --
...and then jennyw said...
%
% Thanks to everyone for the help!
That's why we're here :-)
%
% Is there a place where the default key bindings are listed? For example,
% l being the key for limit isn't in help. Thanks!
I don't know which help you're using, but pressing the '?' br
03-Apr-02 at 08:26, jennyw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Thanks to everyone for the help!
>
> Is there a place where the default key bindings are listed? For example,
> l being the key for limit isn't in help. Thanks!
It is. Right after k (previous message).
Simon.
--
[Simon White. vim/mut
Thanks to everyone for the help!
Is there a place where the default key bindings are listed? For example,
l being the key for limit isn't in help. Thanks!
Jen
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:54:48AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * jennyw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-02 11:53:11 -0800]:
> > I
* jennyw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-02 11:53:11 -0800]:
> I was just wondering how I would search for someone I sent a message to.
> Using / doesn't help -- that only seems to search subject and from:.
Look for "Pattern" in the manual.
Nicolas
Jen,
have you tried using / with ~t?
/ ~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]
should key on mail 'To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
-tim
On Tue, 02 Apr 2002, jennyw wrote:
> I was just wondering how I would search for someone I sent a message to.
> Using / doesn't help -- that only seems to search subject and from:.
I was just wondering how I would search for someone I sent a message to.
Using / doesn't help -- that only seems to search subject and from:.
Also, is there documentation somewhere on searching? I tried hitting help
in mutt, but it doesn't even show that / is a key to hit for searching.
Than
Patrik Modesto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i
> write http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is
> send as a part of email's header and body of this mail is empty. Why?
> Is this correct?
The other posters on t
Patrik Modesto wrote:
> I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i write
> http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is send as a
> part of email's header and body of this mail is empty. Why? Is this
> correct?
Are you using 'set edit_headers' ? If so, you
Hi!
I use Mutt 1.3.27i (2002-01-22) from Debian testing.
I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i write
http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is send as a
part of email's header and body of this mail is empty. Why? Is this
correct?
Patrik
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Jerome De Greef spake thus:
> > So, that is correct behavior from the mailer, and incorrect behavior
> > from the user. :-)
>=20
> I don't know if it's onl
* Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> begin quoting what Patrik Modesto said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 10:24:42AM +0100:
> > I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i write
> > http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is send as a
> > part of email's
begin quoting what Patrik Modesto said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 10:24:42AM +0100:
> I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i write
> http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is send as a
> part of email's header and body of this mail is empty. Why? Is this
* Patrik Modesto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 10:24:42 +0100]:
>Hi!
>I use Mutt 1.3.27i (2002-01-22) from Debian testing.
>
>I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i write
>http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is send as a
>part of email's header an
Hi!
I use Mutt 1.3.27i (2002-01-22) from Debian testing.
I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i write
http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is send as a
part of email's header and body of this mail is empty. Why? Is this
correct?
Patrik
msg26343
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 17:02
* Knute said
> You have your quotes in the wrong place. Try this:
> send-hook ~[EMAIL PROTECTED] "my_hdr Reply-To: Mutt-Users
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>
> They way you had it, was telling mutt to only look in
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
> Certainly seems to be it although I'm having a little trouble getting it
> to work. I keep getting a 'error missing parameter in line 316' (first
> line of the code below)
> send-hook . "my_hdr Reply-To: Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> send-hook ~t "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 14:12
* Im Eunjea said
> * Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-21 13:51]:
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > Certainly seems to be it although I'm having a little trouble getting it
> > to work. I keep getting a 'error missing paramet
* Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-21 13:51]:
[...]
>
> Certainly seems to be it although I'm having a little trouble getting it
> to work. I keep getting a 'error missing parameter in line 316' (first
> line of the code below)
>
> send-hook . "my_hdr Reply-To: Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 13:15
* Ken Wahl said
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:43:26PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone.
> > I've been looking through the docs and can't find what controls the
> > Reply-To
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 at 12:43:26 +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> I've been looking through the docs and can't find what controls the
> Reply-To header. I want to set folder-hooks for some mailing lists I
> subscribe to where the users are inclined to hit the '
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone.
I've been looking through the docs and can't find what controls the
Reply-To header. I want to set folder-hooks for some mailing lists I
subscribe to where the users are inclined to hit the 'reply button' in
Outhouse
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
