On Sep 20, 2011 at 08:47 PM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
How can I do this with Mutt? It's not in the folder list, and I can't
change to it manually. Any ideas?
In the mutt manual, look up 'imap_check_subscribed' and
'imap_list_subscribed'. I would imagine that mutt will only check
mailboxes
Freeman wrote:
Thanks guys. I had read something that, on revisiting, seems rather unclear.
I have a text file of lists for spam-bouncer/procmail which muttrc grep's
for 'subscribe' .
Of course, that doesn't get me aliases and recipes. Seems I could approach
your py elegance with a bash script,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:09:41AM +, Chris G wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:05:27AM -0500, Tim Gray wrote:
> > On Tue 19, Jan'10 at 9:41 PM -0800, Freeman wrote:
> > >Then "mutt users" is a subscribed lists *and* a known list.
> > >
> > >Should not I therefore be able to type a distinct
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 02:11:26PM +, Chris G wrote:
> > On Wed 20, Jan'10 at 10:09 AM +, Chris G wrote:
> > >You need to set up an alias for the list in order to be able to use a
> > >shorted name for it when composing new mail.
> >
> > Yeah, I just never bothered with that step since I u
On Wed 20, Jan'10 at 3:05 PM +, Chris G wrote:
You've hit the nail on the head! :-) It's like procmail but driven
from the same 'configuration' file as getAliases.py and getLists.py.
Will the mutt list allow attachments - I'll try, they're not very big
so I'm sure they won't hit any size
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:05:29PM +, Chris G wrote:
> Will the mutt list allow attachments - I'll try, they're not very big
> so I'm sure they won't hit any size restrictions.
>
It does allow attachments! :-)
Just a bit more information, the format of the filter file, here's the
top of the
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:44:25AM -0500, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Wed 20, Jan'10 at 2:11 PM +, Chris G wrote:
> >I can upload/attach the scripts if anyone is interested, getAliases.py
> >and getLists.py are trivial but there's a bit more to the mail
> >filtering one.
>
> I wouldn't turn down the
On Wed 20, Jan'10 at 2:11 PM +, Chris G wrote:
I can upload/attach the scripts if anyone is interested, getAliases.py
and getLists.py are trivial but there's a bit more to the mail
filtering one.
I wouldn't turn down the chance to see them, but they should be easy to
implement.
However,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:29:11AM -0500, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Wed 20, Jan'10 at 10:09 AM +, Chris G wrote:
> >You need to set up an alias for the list in order to be able to use a
> >shorted name for it when composing new mail.
>
> Yeah, I just never bothered with that step since I usually on
On Wed 20, Jan'10 at 10:09 AM +, Chris G wrote:
You need to set up an alias for the list in order to be able to use a
shorted name for it when composing new mail.
Yeah, I just never bothered with that step since I usually only reply to
lists.
I have a simple text file where I keep a lis
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:05:27AM -0500, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Tue 19, Jan'10 at 9:41 PM -0800, Freeman wrote:
> >Then "mutt users" is a subscribed lists *and* a known list.
> >
> >Should not I therefore be able to type a distinct part of the mailing list
> >in a To field?
>
> I think it affects
On Tue 19, Jan'10 at 9:41 PM -0800, Freeman wrote:
Then "mutt users" is a subscribed lists *and* a known list.
Should not I therefore be able to type a distinct part of the mailing list
in a To field?
I think it affects the status display of a message in the index AND lets you
type 'L' to re
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:42:36PM -0700, Rob Lingelbach wrote:
> > set index_format="%4C %Z %[!%y%m%d] %-17.17F (%3l) %s"
> thank you Sven. I read the fine manual a few times and can't find
> --you know, it's part of human nature to make the same mistake more
> than once, according to physici
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> set index_format="%4C %Z %[!%y%m%d] %-17.17F (%3l) %s"
>
> you are mixing up %Z with %F there. rtfm.
thank you Sven. I read the fine manual a few times and can't find
--you know, it's part of human nature to make the same mistake more
than once, ac
* Rob Lingelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-24 13:08]:
> is there a way to use 'subscribe' and index_format to have the 'L' flag
> on a message to show it's from a list, but instead of having the string
> "To " returned, return the name of the author, as would happen if
> I didn't have the list
Alright, my bad. Shift-L seems to work every time. The seeming
randomness was confusing, but I was just doing it wrong. Thanks all.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 02:42:04PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Michael Montagne muttered:
> > I'm familiar with the "subscribe" and "lists" commands to place th
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 01:29:08PM +0100, Lee J . Moore wrote:
[..]
> Weird that it would work with some but not all. Are you pressing
> Shift+L to reply to a list?
Hmmm, actually not weird at all. If the mailing list address is in the
To: header, it's going to be the reply address whether you
Michael Montagne muttered:
> I'm familiar with the "subscribe" and "lists" commands to place the
> address of the mailing list in the To: header when replying to a mailing
> list but mine appear broken. For this list I have:
> subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> And whenever I reply. the senders name
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:32:08AM -0700, Michael Montagne wrote:
> I'm familiar with the "subscribe" and "lists" commands to place the
> address of the mailing list in the To: header when replying to a mailing
> list but mine appear broken. For this list I have:
> subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Wednesday, Apr 04, 2001, Paul Cox wrote:
> There is no escape! =)
>
> Seriously, though, here's a snippet of the email I got when I joined:
>
> -
Wow... just took 12 hours for my message to go through... that's why I
sent it again... weird.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ#: 25370820, OpenPG
On Wednesday, Apr 04, 2001, pogmahon wrote:
> How do i unsubscribe from mutt-users?.
>
> cant find the option on the website at all
There is no escape! =)
Seriously, though, here's a snippet of the email I got when I joined:
-
If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing lis
On Wednesday, Apr 04, 2001, pogmahon wrote:
> How do i unsubscribe from mutt-users?.
>
> cant find the option on the website at all
There is no escape! =)
Seriously, though, here's a snippet of the email I got when I joined:
-
If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing lis
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 10:55:04PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:25:23AM -0600, Timothy Legant wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:29:03PM -0700, Nathan Saper wrote:
> > > Is it possible to use the "subscribe" command, but still have the author's
> > > name appear in
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:29:03PM -0700, Nathan Saper wrote:
> Is it possible to use the "subscribe" command, but still have the author's
> name appear in the message index, instead of the name of the mailing list?
You just need to change your index_format appropriately, either
permanently, or f
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:25:23AM -0600, Timothy Legant wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:29:03PM -0700, Nathan Saper wrote:
> > Is it possible to use the "subscribe" command, but still have the author's
> > name appear in the message index, instead of the name of the mailing list?
>
> I use %
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:29:03PM -0700, Nathan Saper wrote:
> Is it possible to use the "subscribe" command, but still have the author's
> name appear in the message index, instead of the name of the mailing list?
I use %F to accomplish this in all my "subscribe"d mailboxes.
-thl
PGP signatu
Bruce DeVisser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 21 Sep 2000:
> Am I correct in understanding that subscribe/lists matches are from
> the beginning of the pattern only? (I.e., there is no way to specify a
> series of lists on egroups.com all at once?)
Yes, your understand is correct.
Mikko
--
Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 11 Sep 2000:
> Can someone please explain to me the difference between subscribe and lists?
subscribe tells Mutt that the address is a mailing list to which you're
subscribed to.
lists tells Mutt that the address is a mailing list, but you're not
subsc
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 10:22:46PM +0200, Juergen Salk wrote:
> * Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000911 21:55]:
> > Also, is there a way to tell the index that even though a message was sent
> > to a list I'm subscribed to, I still want to see who sent it?
>
> Try changing the "L" in your index
* Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000911 21:55]:
> Also, is there a way to tell the index that even though a message was sent
> to a list I'm subscribed to, I still want to see who sent it?
Try changing the "L" in your index_format to "F", e.g. change
set index_format="%4C %Z %[!%d%m%y] %-17.17
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry, the new subscribe command is equivalent to what was formerly
> known as "lists". "lists" is essentially a weaker version now which
> only affects the list-reply function.
>
> (Partially, the naming is due to the fact that I couldn't think
>
On 2000-02-15 00:34:28 +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> While this reasoning may be valid, I never liked the new
> subscribe command.
Sorry, the new subscribe command is equivalent to what was formerly
known as "lists". "lists" is essentially a weaker version now which
only affects the list-repl
> Not sure, I don't know what the motivate for having the "subscribe" command
> separate from the "lists" command was.
Check out the archives for mutt-dev from last year November. tlr posted
an explanation why the distinction between "known" and "subscribed"
mailing lists would be useful. (I
On 2000-02-14 15:49:21 -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> Not sure, I don't know what the motivate for having the
> "subscribe" command separate from the "lists" command was.
Imagine the case that you (1) know about a list but (2) aren't
subscribed to it. Further, imagine there are discussions CCed
Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 14 Feb 2000:
> Not sure, I don't know what the motivate for having the "subscribe" command
> separate from the "lists" command was.
As I understood it, it was to allow you to automatically generate the
MFT header for mailing lists where you (freque
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 01:04:05AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> That's odd. If you have a .muttrc file from 1.0 (or 1.0.1) and move to
> 1.1.x, then it should -- as far as I understand -- still recognise the
> address as a valid list, and generate a MFT header. However, the
> contents of the h
Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 14 Feb 2000:
> The documentation on this subject really needs to be cleaned up before 1.2.
> It's not clear what the effect of setting these is. I missed the discussion
> about this and only discovered the other day that I was not generating the
>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 11:04:19AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> The change will be in version 1.2. 1.0.1 is a bug-fix release of
> 1.0 with minimal changes, not containing any of the more interesting
> changes done to the code in the meantime.
The documentation on this subject really needs to
On 2000-02-14 01:10:40 -0500, Russell Hoover wrote:
> I thought this change was going to take place in version 1.0.1,
> but AFAKCT it hasn't. Is this change still in the works, or has
> it been abandoned?
The change will be in version 1.2. 1.0.1 is a bug-fix release of
1.0 with minimal changes
39 matches
Mail list logo
