Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry, the new subscribe command is equivalent to what was formerly
> known as "lists". "lists" is essentially a weaker version now which
> only affects the list-reply function.
>
> (Partially, the naming is due to the fact that I couldn't think
> about a better name than "lists" for known, but unsubscribed lists -
> "unsubscribe" would have been against the systematic of the un*
> commands.)
What about 'nonsubscribe'?
Charles
--
----------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
----------------------------------------------------