On 2000-02-14 01:10:40 -0500, Russell Hoover wrote: > I thought this change was going to take place in version 1.0.1, > but AFAKCT it hasn't. Is this change still in the works, or has > it been abandoned? The change will be in version 1.2. 1.0.1 is a bug-fix release of 1.0 with minimal changes, not containing any of the more interesting changes done to the code in the meantime. -- http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
- "subscribe" vs. "lists" Russell Hoover
- Re: "subscribe" vs. "lists" Thomas Roessler
- Re: "subscribe" vs. "lists" Michael Elkins
- Re: "subscribe" vs. "lists&quo... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: "subscribe" vs. "lists... Michael Elkins
- Re: "subscribe" vs. "... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: "subscribe" vs. "... Thomas Roessler
- Re: "subscribe" vs. "... Lars Hecking
- Re: "subscribe" vs. &q... Thomas Roessler
- Re: "subscribe" vs... Charles Cazabon