Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 14 Feb 2000:
> The documentation on this subject really needs to be cleaned up before 1.2.
> It's not clear what the effect of setting these is.  I missed the discussion
> about this and only discovered the other day that I was not generating the
> m-f-t header field.  :-)

That's odd.  If you have a .muttrc file from 1.0 (or 1.0.1) and move to
1.1.x, then it should -- as far as I understand -- still recognise the
address as a valid list, and generate a MFT header.  However, the
contents of the header will be wrong, indicating a reply should go to
both to the list and your own address.

Hmm, is that a bug or have I misunderstood something, or what is going
on?  I'll try to remember to do some testing with the "lists" command
under 1.1.3 later to see if I can figure anything out...


Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
"Personally, I want my computer's memory to be more reliable than mine."  /.

Reply via email to