On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 01:04:05AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> That's odd. If you have a .muttrc file from 1.0 (or 1.0.1) and move to
> 1.1.x, then it should -- as far as I understand -- still recognise the
> address as a valid list, and generate a MFT header. However, the
> contents of the header will be wrong, indicating a reply should go to
> both to the list and your own address.
That's definitely not what the code is doing. I resorted to using gdb to
trace the call to mutt_set_followup_to() and it definitely only looks for
mailing lists using the "subscribe"d list, not the "lists" list.
> Hmm, is that a bug or have I misunderstood something, or what is going
> on? I'll try to remember to do some testing with the "lists" command
> under 1.1.3 later to see if I can figure anything out...
Not sure, I don't know what the motivate for having the "subscribe" command
separate from the "lists" command was.
me
--
pgp key available from http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~me/elkins-pgp-key.asc
PGP signature
