Testing packet sizes beyond the MTU is pointless unless you use that in a
real-world scenario. You are testing a lot more than the ethernet chip and
driver, in any event.
What are you testing for? It's not very clear from your original message.
Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Henning Br
If you search the links from netgate.com you can find prism firmwares up to
1.8.0 or 1.8.4 which give you various interesting features and bugfixes
Melameth, Daniel D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jason Murray wrote:
> > $ cat /var/run/dmesg.boot | grep wi0
> > wi0 at pci0 dev 20 function 0 "Intersi
Or you could run mod_perl
Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:21:54PM +0200, misiu wrote:
> > Tony Abernethy schrieb:
> >
> > >The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
> > >need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
> > >All the
Anon Y. Mous [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Is OpenBSD 3.8 compatible with the optical
> DVD-RW/CD-RW CF-VDM291U MultiDrive for the CF-29
> ToughBook?
>
Probably. Has anyone run into an ATAPI DVD/CDROM in the past 5 years that
didn't work? (At least the basic functionality?)
altq is looking at kilobits per second and you're probably looking at kiloBytes
per second
(237Kb/sec / 8bits/Byte=29KB/sec)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Problem:
> Bandwidth management is not working as expected; instead of streaming data
> inbound with 237 Kb/s
What's wrong with standards? Just stick with SIP/RTP based phones (and
you can use Asterisk on OpenBSD for voicemail service and other features)
and IPsec for security. If it's impractical to use IPsec for some types of
users or most, for whatever reason, then you have to consider what the
implic
C. Bensend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I haven't had good luck with AMD64 so far. The server I built not
> a year ago has had more kernel panics and funky-ass behavior than
> any system I've built since the RedHat 6.2 days. AMD64 is likely
> a damned good processor, but it's kind of soured on me.
Simon Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong but don't you still need to use something like
> fetchmail to download your mail, and doesn't that rely on an MTA of
> some sort?
>
mutt works with imap based folders
you just type in an imap url instead of a folder name when you
tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Most nice switches can tag all vlans on a trunk. OpenBSD is doing the right
> thing.
>
Sure, once you set the "native vlan" to something other than vlan 1. Most
switches have a "native vlan" concept which really just means untagged.
Jonathan Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> 11g modes are not yet supported on ath, 11b or 11a only iirc.
11a (OFDM) doesn't work on CM9 (or newer cards), reverse engineering the
HAL is not easy at all
Bart Kus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > 11a (OFDM) doesn't work on CM9 (or newer cards), reverse engineering the
> > HAL is not easy at all
>
> How about the Ubiquiti Networks SR2 & SR5? I'm guessing since they're
> both AR5213-based, neither of them would work in 11g/11a respectively.
>
Yeah
Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> My concern is the strength of Blowfish--it's robustness--if someone with
> a large amount of resources desired to crack it.
>
You mention that twofish is faster than blowfish. So, you would rather
make a brute force password attack easier?
gwost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> ERROR: File not uploaded, file could not be found or could not be moved:
> /var/www/htdocs/torrenti/.torrents/xyxyxyxyx.torrent
>
Your php application should just know about /htdocs rather than /var/www/htdocs
if the web server is chrooted.
Maybe one of these is really supposed to be a PCI-PCI bridge.
"Nvidia nForce4 DDR" rev 0xa3 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 not configured
"Nvidia nForce4 ISA" rev 0xa3 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 not configured
"Nvidia nForce4 SMBus" rev 0xa2 at pci0 dev 1 function 1 not configured
Kent Ho [EMAIL PROTECTE
Dustin Lundquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have the K8SE (non rack mount version) and I verified that the
> Broadcom NICs where not seen by either the amd64 or i386 RAMDISK kernels
> on the 3.8 release CDs. The Broadcom NIC is attached the the AMD 8131
> HT-PCI bridge not the NForce junk. The K8
RV Tec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What about the Supermicro boards? Are they any good?
>
the supermicro/serverworks board that i use works very well
--
"Don Rumsfeld has been chewing on my ankles." -- Dick Cheney
has anyone used ipsecctl with a win xp client yet?
if so, can you share what options worked on the openbsd and win xp side?
--
"Don Rumsfeld has been chewing on my ankles." -- Dick Cheney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What motherboards are folks using that support these (64 bit) PCI
> slots? Most "consumer grade" x86 motherboards only have 32-bit PCI
> slots. I've seen very few motherboards (at least at newegg) that
> have 64-bit PCI, and they're very expensive.
at the smallest packet sizes, that sounds about right, if not slightly
low
Carlos Valiente [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi! I have a couple of WRAP.1E boards running OpenBSD 3.8. Using iperf
> I can only get about 4 to 5 Mbit/s between them.
>
> Is that figure reasonable for that kind of systems?
>
isn't the openbsd driver derived from the freebsd if_sk?
Christoph Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 16:20 schrieb Adam Dennis:
> > I noticed that openbsd-current doesn't have support for Marvell
> > Yukon88E8053 PCI-E Gigabit (onboard).
>
> I have the same if, but not
Jan Stary [h...@stare.cz] wrote:
> The "Passing Traffic" example at
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html
> doesn't seem to be completely accurate.
>
> # Pass traffic in on dc0 from the local network, 192.168.0.0/24,
> # to the OpenBSD machine's IP address 192.168.0.1. Also, pass
Yeah they are actually tested/supported in 5.1 and maybe 5.0 too.
Pierre Berthier [pierre.berth...@ini.phys.ethz.ch] wrote:
> Hi
>
> it seems to me the Myricom 10GB Ethernet devices should be supported by
> OpenBSD, according to myx(4) and the What's new page of 5.0
> http://www.openbsd.org/50.h
Rafael Zalamena [rzalam...@gmail.com] wrote:
> ifconfig mpe0 192.168.1.130/32 -mplslabel 12345 up
> ifconfig mpe0 192.168.10.132/32 -mplslabel 54321 up
>
> What am I missing??
I think you want option "mplslabel", not "-mplslabel" which should _remove_
existing labels from the interface rather th
It's the wonderful new synaptics support in the pms driver.
It also causes a bunch of other odd behavior and is really fucking annoying if
you aren't used to it.
F Bax [fbax...@gmail.com] wrote:
> I upgraded from 5.0 to 5.1 yesterday; everything looks good except that tap
> of touchpad is ignore
Nick Holland [n...@holland-consulting.net] wrote:
> * you don't want to fsck a 3TB file system, 'specially if it is
> rebuilding the mirror at the same time, though with 12G RAM, you
> might be able to do it.
>
Isn't this situation seriously improved with fsck in 5.1 ?
Steve Shockley [steve.shock...@shockley.net] wrote:
>
> We Americans have to enjoy the bars, there's not much left to do
> besides drink.
There's always "bath salts" and eating off homeless people's faces.
This is all making me very worried about Brad's MailScanner and whether or not
it actually caught any viruses that might infect my mutt mail client.
I wasn't aware that a firewall needed configuration files or GUI. What is my
firewall doing? I don't know. How can claims of pure ignorance, preju
Gasko, Peter [gaskopeter0...@postafiok.hu] wrote:
>
> 2)
> https://www.bitrig.org/index.php?title=FAQ
> A NEW OpenBSD fork! Will OpenBSD profit from this project?? :)
>
Yes, quite probably.
If you diff -ur openbsd bitrig you'll find the changes are almost all related
to either removing AFS, r
Tomas Bodzar [tomas.bod...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> It's obvious that you were not reading FAQ/man pages, because you
> modified files which are not supposed to be modified because of
> experience from some other OS or because you were reading some "howto
> install OpenBSD/Linux/BSD/Unix" somewhere o
??? [hohoho...@dreamsecurity.com] wrote:
> I have question for openssh
>
> SSH server with RSA key exchange?
> I need to look for a free ssh server that accepts RSA key exchange instead of
> diffie-hellman.
openssh supports both
read the sshd_config man page for details
Duh, this is OpenBSD. We use
banner `ftp -o - http://www.openbsd.org/`
Chris Bennett [ch...@bennettconstruction.us] wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 06:59:28PM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> > If you really wanna improve that, I'd suggest reworking the same
> > webpage, but making it pos
Peter Laufenberg [open...@laufenberg.ch] wrote:
>
> I'm willing to indirectly donate to OpenBSD by paying a professional graphic
> designer to redo parts of OpenBSD's visual design. His portfolio:
>
> www.flexstudio.ch
>
> Richard is a very good friend but still your typical starving artist w
Peter Laufenberg [open...@laufenberg.ch] wrote:
>
> Richard's not a web designer; he's a graphic designer. He put his portfolio
> on blogspot after I commented that downloading a single, enormous PDF kindof
> sucked, and I didn't know of a CMS that didn't suck.
>
It should go without saying (a
Amit Kulkarni [amitk...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> they are cheap in india for a specific reason,
Most people in India can't afford to pay US/EU prices there
> and they are expensive in US/EU for another specific reason.
>
Because more people in US/EU don't buy the India version
> this is getting i
LEVAI Daniel [l...@ecentrum.hu] wrote:
> > 2) jmb0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "JMicron JMB363 IDE/SATA" rev 0x03
> > Worked nicely. According to systat it provided around 30MB/sec write
> > speed, whereas the SiI3512A only had around 20MB/sec.
>
> This is good to know, I'm sure I'll prefer this kind
OpenBSD/amd64 and OpenBSD/i386 both support Core i5 based machines.
Mayuresh Kathe [mayur...@kathe.in] wrote:
> would it be there?
> http://www.openbsd.org/plat.html shows nothing.
> googling around too showed information not upto date (from my location).
>
> need a reliable desktop system with a
I'm porting it for myself, although I stopped for a while because nobody else
showed much interest in it. I have the opposite view of Claudio, I'd love to
have this capability. It looks attractive for things like high-speed packet
capture and analysis. For re-implementing things that are already
Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > But having a generic mechanism to bring network data in/out userland for
> > analysis or manipulation, abstracted in a secure way from the kernel across
> > multiple ne
Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
>
> so i should move the whole filtering stack to userland... seems like a
> needless work for simple packet capture
And I completely disagree.
You think what the kernel does now is simple ?
Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
> for clients (processes) that need to do trivial filtering, e.g.,
> tcpdump 'ether multicast and not broadcast', it's an overhaul for
> nothing
>
> the placement of the filtering stack in the kernel is completely
> irrelevant to "how simple" it will end up
Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
>
> i don't expect *every* application to manage the rx/tx rings directly,
> reinject when they're done
>
Let's be more practical here. Luigi already gives you a stub pcap library that
does this for you. You can take an existing pcap application, link it
Claudio Jeker [cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com] wrote:
>
> > Why go through layers and layers of kernel processing for applications
> > that simply don't need to? That's the goal here. Not replacing BPF.
>
> You think it is better to go through layers and layers of userland code?
> In the end you need
noah pugsley [noah.pugs...@gmail.com] wrote:
> For fucks sake, just donate already! \
> You know you use this shit every day \
> I am an absolutely poor loser, I had $18 US (dollars, yech! Real men use
> gold or rupees) \
> after getting smokes and tall cans (corey, trevor, let's go!) and I just
>
Ted Unangst [t...@tedunangst.com] wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:53, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>
> > /reference/, they're not meant to solve high-level problems. The FAQs are
> > really are no FAQs at all but a gigantic snowball with floppy install
> > instructions crucially leaving out 5 1/4"
I don't think the in-tree bind supports dnssec. Bind 10 is the second or third
major re-write of Paul Vixie's oriignal, designed to support it dnssec in the
latest versions. nsd handles dnssec out of the box and it's in-tree. Once you
get used to the config file, which is simple, it's pretty eas
somehow, your computer thinks C3_CPUID_HAS_RNG is valid, which would mean you
are running the via_nano_setup routine, which means your cpu model is "VIA Nano
processor", which is all just wrong. wtf?
LEVAI Daniel [l...@ecentrum.hu] wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> I'm just curious if this is something that
Z? Loff [zel...@zeloff.org] wrote:
> Sorry for the noise, I'll crawl back into my hole now.
Hey, it's better than the 147th notice that my African bank account is now
suspended.
--
Keep them laughing half the time, scared of you the other half. And always keep
them guessing. -- Clair George
name wesley
> I can't access.
>
> tail /var/log/radicale give me :
> 2012-09-05 15:27:24,244 - INFO: Checking rights for collection owned
> by nobody
> 2012-09-05 15:27:24,244 - INFO: wesley refused
> 2012-09-05 15:27:24,244 - DEBUG: Answer status: 401 Unauthorized
>
&g
Wesley [open...@e-solutions.re] wrote:
> Euh... httpd is not used here.
>
Oh, well see, then you're asking the wrong person. I don't even know what
radicale is.
> Without authentication (i.e type = None ), using ical (from iMac),
> it works great AND without httpd.
> I just added htpasswd, and
the async flag is not necessary
Chaminda Indrajith [c.indraj...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Thanks...
> I did it and steps are shown below.
>
>
> mount_mfs -s 2097152 /dev/sd0b /var/amavisd/tmp/
>
> # df -h
> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> mfs:30586 1005M2.0K955M
Z?? Loff [zel...@zeloff.org] wrote:
>
>
> >> Now that I know httpd isn't involved, it sounds like htpasswd isn't
> >> using an algorithm compatible with radicale. The htpasswd man page
> >> says crypt(3) is the default but clearly SHA is the default.
>
> Yes, but you can either use -s on htpassw
So, every time I increase the size of the ramdisk, I tempt fate. In other point
of view, it's also the textbook definition as to why custom kernels aren't
supported here. Clearly, something's missing.
Peter Kay [syllops...@syllopsium.co.uk] wrote:
> I have a Pentium III system running 5.1 curren
Tom Bodr [tomas.bod...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I???m quite sure that there are people which were able to replace Cisco and
> similar with OpenBSD or related products (and/or other open source) in
> their companies or helped to do that. However it???s quite hard to find real
> examp
noah pugsley [noah.pugs...@gmail.com] wrote:
> C'mon kids, it's huawei or the highway. Who would you rather have spy on
> you, the Chinese government, or the US empire?
Everyone on this list already knows your root password. You need to start using
RSA keys.
Francisco Valladolid H. [fic...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Hi Tito
>
> I'm currently using a old Thinkpad T61p, good machine and OpenBSD 5.1 work
> fine.
>
nvidia graphics.
Tobias Ulmer [tobi...@tmux.org] wrote:
>
> Here is something to read: http://harmful.cat-v.org/cat-v/
>
I never knew cat -v was an option. Amazing! That was one of the most useful
features in cat and I've never even seen it before! Now if only I could find
something to use with tn3270
--
th
Dajka Tamas [dajka.ta...@upc.hu] wrote:
> Assigning one of the phys devices as vlandev to a vlan is not working. I
> mean, I can assign to them, but if vlan40 is assigned to hme2 and hme2
> failes, than vlan40 will be down and hosts in vlan40 are unreacheable.
>
> So:
>
> ifconfig hme2 up
> ifc
Jeff Ross [jr...@openvistas.net] wrote:
>
> This hang happens with the 4 different SuperMicro based motherboards
> I have that have the lm chipset.
>
> In the second message referenced above I noted that a snapshot dated
> May 25 booted normally and I first ran into the problem on June 6 so
> the
STeve Andre' [and...@msu.edu] wrote:
> On 07/07/11 15:12, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> >>The developers don't adopt new things just because they're new.
> >>If something isn't reasonable, useful and secure it isn't used. This
> >>is one reason why each new release of OpenBSD doesn't have the
> >>current
MG [mas...@fourseasonsnow.com] wrote:
> Forgive my ignorance, but does this mean that if I were to install
> OpenBSD 4.9 via FTP today, there shouldn't be random IPsec
> disconnects as described in bug PR6601? Thanks.
Only if it's 4.9-current (snapshot)
If you install 4.9 release, you have to up
Lennart Poettering has graced the world with his brilliance one more time.
Why? Lennart doesn't "think BSD is too relevant anymore."
http://linuxfr.org/nodes/86687/comments/1249943
Lennart is the brains behind highly relevant software such as "PulseAudio",
widely known as the broken audio sys
Nico Kadel-Garcia [nka...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> Don't mistake OpenSSH for OpenBSD. The early history is fascinating.
>
> http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/ssh/ch01_05.htm
>
> (I was involved in very early SunOS ports of ssh-1 and ssh-2, before
> OpenSSH existed.)
Most of the ea
patrick keshishian [pkesh...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> That's what I was wondering. Is this not considered distribution?
> (realizing I might be poking at a hornet's nest).
Stop distributing illegal firmware you pirate
jakemsr sent this which fixed the problem on "6SERIES" and is documented on
datasheets of these other chipsets as well:
Index: azalia.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/azalia.c,v
retrieving revision 1.198
diff -u -r1.198 azalia.c
James A. Peltier [jpelt...@sfu.ca] wrote:
>
> I think there is an issue with Broadcom cards and VLANs IIRC. On the Dell
> R200 I have the integrated bge drivers do not seem to support VLANs, other
> cards might not have issues but YMMV.
This isn't supposed to be broken, get the device ID of yo
i386 port has access to 32-bit (4 GB) address space but only allows you to use
up to 3 GB of RAM at most, the last 1 GB of address space is used for
addressing devices, and as others are saying here, video card shared mem also
eats up space <4 GB
openbsd didn't bother with PAE on i386, it's too
martian67 [martia...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> It is extremely clear, no non-ISC licensed/similarly licensed
> software will be imported into base. Peroid.
I don't know about that. Quite a bit of GPL software is now being incorporated
into the base tree. In fact, Theo is almost finished importing
This is a port, not part of the OpenBSD base system. You should take this up
with the port maintainer and the author of smtp-vilter.
Aaron Jackson [jack...@msrce.howard.edu] wrote:
> Irene killed my firewall/web server/mail sever, so I'm in the process of
> recreating its setup with the current
somebody actually wrote their own open source replacement for the frontpage
CGIs sometime, that might be worth a look. i'm sure you can find it searching
around.
or, you can replace mod_frontpage with suexec, a small wrapper that you get to
compile, and mod_rewrite rules. you still have to use
Alec Taylor [alec.tayl...@gmail.com] wrote:
> What's the project?
>
> I know about ~1000 open-source projects, so if you tell me the task it
> solves, I can give you a couple of open-source projects which
> implement the required feature-set.
>
yes, and in fact you can find many open source proj
Carlos A. Garcia G. [samu...@loscabos.gob.mx] wrote:
>
> On 09/09/11 10:12, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> >somebody actually wrote their own open source replacement for the frontpage
> >CGIs sometime, that might be worth a look. i'm sure you can find it
> >searchi
Tito Mari Francis Esca??o [titomarifran...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Dennis Ritchie should be the patron saint of software development and
> engineering. :)
wouldn't that be fred brooks?
VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO [vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br] wrote:
> > > After messing around with boot -c I was able to get it working
> > > by disabling acpi, apm and mpbios. Hope this helps someone, since
> > > I didn't find anything about this error on the OpenBSD archives...
> >
> > Nvidia HW is quite too m
Time to upgrade to 5.0. Report any failures after you do that.
Leon Me?ner [l.mess...@physik.tu-berlin.de] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we are running a backup firewall machine which regularly freezes since
> OpenBSD 4.6. The configuration also changed at this time. When frozen no
> input is accepted by
Christiano F. Haesbaert [haesba...@haesbaert.org] wrote:
> On 17 October 2011 16:26, James Shupe wrote:
> > Has anybody successfully installed and tested OpenBSD on a Routerboard
> > 450G? I searched the archive for a dmesg and/ or confirmation, but
> > couldn't find a definitive answer.
> >
> > h
5.0 may be able to do this or close to it as long as you aren't load up lots of
pf rules (perhaps, leave pf off entirely)
the intel or broadcom gig nics should both be in the game here.
tx [zzw...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Is it possible to make 1 Mpps router (BGP and routing between
> several 1GB
Tomas Bodzar [tomas.bod...@gmail.com] wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:23 PM, tx wrote:
> > Is it possible to make 1 Mpps router (BGP and routing between several 1GBE
> > links) with standard x86 CPU such as Xeon or Opteron and "accelerated" NICs
> > like Intel PRO1000/PT? All with latest stable
Marco would want term.xxx maybe
bofh [goodb...@gmail.com] wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:36 AM, rancor wrote:
> > Lol, what a scam! We got calls with the same context in Sweden as well.
>
> There's one for .xxx as well. I can see it now, RED HAWT OSes just
> waiting for you!!! openbsd.xxx
yes you have to go to -current ports if you want php-fpm
keith [ke...@scott-land.net] wrote:
> Was planning on setting php-fpm up today on a new OpenBSD 5.0 box
> but can't find php-fpm. I though it was built in to php from version
> 5.3.3 onwards but it doesn't seem to be. I am trying to setup a
unless there is some special trick for 82571 that isn't necessary for newer
chips,
if (sc->hw.mac_type < em_82572)
...
Jussi Peltola [pe...@pelzi.net] wrote:
> You can ignore the clueless parts in my previous message :)
>
> I can set up remote access to one of these machines if needed.
>
> Th
Good alternative: OpenBSD + unbound
hvom .org [hvom@gmail.com] wrote:
> Hi
>
> DNS Google NS 1 : 8.8.8.8NS 2 : 8.8.4.4
>
> Good alternative or Bad alternative ?
>
> Best regards
--
There are only three sports: bullfighting, motor racing, and mountaineering;
all the rest are merely g
Manuel Ravasio [manuelrava...@yahoo.com] wrote:
> Chris,
> why would you suggest unbound instead of bind?
> Which advantages do you
> see?
unbound is very fast, will automatically relookup expired entries and has less
weird/odd issues like keeping a negative cache entry for hours or even days.
i
fRANz [andrea.francesc...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> what about unbound vs dnscache?!
> Any document related?
>
unbound is very fast and plays well with misbehaving servers and poorly
implemented zone data
dnscache (the last time i tried it using it on a large scale) could not resolve
cer
Aaron Mason [simplersolut...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> Firstly, the scanning issue. The CM9 is an industrial card designed
> for use in wireless links and in IBSS networks. They don't have the
> ability to search for other access points - they're meant to BE an
> access point.
>
Bullshit. It's ju
Daniel Barowy [dbar...@barowy.net] wrote:
>
> The problem is that we're copying the entire disk, so, as far as the
> disk (i.e., SSDs) is aware, that disk is 100% full-- all blocks are
To make your deployment faster, just use fdisk, disklabel, newfs to setup the
disk and tar to copy the files.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 01:52:58PM -0400, Daniel Barowy wrote:
>
> The reality is that our novice administrators rarely do any real
> server deployment-- it's really just me and another guy-- so when it
> comes down to it, this is just a time-saving measure for us. The
> genesis of it was from do
it requires driver modifications for all 802.11n supporting chips, and
ieee80211 infrastructure update to add support for new modulation rates other
new 11n techniques that are tied into the stack
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera [h...@osvaldobarrera.com.ar] wrote:
> I know that 802.11n is not supported yet
Ryan McBride [mcbr...@openbsd.org] wrote:
>
> Are you suggesting that because you have a quad-port gig nic, your box
> should be able to do 6 *million* packets per second? By that logic my
> 5-port Soekris net4801 should be able to handle 740kpps. (for reference,
> the net4801 does about 3kpps wit
The new official amd64 limit is 1GB.
Bryan [bra...@gmail.com] wrote:
> So, now that BIGMEM is up, what is the new max? are we talking TB?
> or is 8GB the new upper limit?
Rodrigo Mosconi [open...@mosconi.mat.br] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm interested on some benchmarks, specially with network/PF.
>
How about this...With GENERIC -current amd64 kernel, I'm getting almost 800Mbps
on a single FTP transfer between two 1Gbit-connected boxes with em controllers
and mfi R
Amit Kulkarni [amitk...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Chris, don't forget to mention that they are simplifying the buffer cache
> (and bigmem!) so that when the attempted switch to rthreads comes, there will
> be far less hassles
> compared to FreeBSD or NetBSD, which literally took 2-5 years to perfect.
looks like a setup bug in the non-attachment of inteldrm?
try disabling inteldrm in the UKC
(boot -c
disable inteldrm
quit)
Ivo Chutkin [open...@bgone.net] wrote:
> Hello sirs,
> I have problem to get this system running.
> It is Supermicro P8SCi, dmesg and panic messages are below.
> I have thr
Brad DeMorrow [bdemor...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> Below is my dmesg, please let me know if there is any other
> information I could provide that would be useful.
> PS: It looks like my dmesg is also indicating an issue with wpi
> firmware as well - although I haven't had any problems using it.
as a
This is some kind of BIOS boot-up support
The chips on this board are run-of-the-mill em
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #32: Sat Apr 23 18:16:16 PDT 2011
ch...@celery.ykwc.com:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 8580038656 (8182MB)
avail mem = 8337596416 (7951MB)
mainbus0
Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote:
>
> there hasn't been support for any newer bus-based accelerators
> added recently (overheads for these are typically rather high).
>
> currently if you want fast AES, you should be looking at the
> newer intel cpus with AESNI (and OpenBSD 4.9 or ne
Please describe slowness in more detail. Where does it occur? What is
happening? etc...
You can disable amdiic at the UKC prompt. this thing is an amd64 right?
boot> bsd -c
UKC> diable amdiic
UKC> quit
Beavis [pfu...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Greetings to All,
>
> I'm running OpenBSD 4.6 as a we
Peter Bako [pe...@bakonet.org] wrote:
> (http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/embedded/)
Doing this by hand is strange. It's only worth doing if you already understand
what you're doing (and you have a specific need) or if you want to spend a bit
of time learning.
This guide and various others l
at's still running :)
Kevin Chadwick [ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk] wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:59:00 -0700
> Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>
> > I continue to kill R/W flash (last year, I killed a brand new SuperTalent
> > server-class SLC SSD after 1 month of use, testing some huge and
FWIW, with whatever older chips I've tested with, the interrupt mitigation on
the bge driver seems to be configured a bit more aggressive than on em..I see
interrupt counts from bge that are 1/2 to 1/4th the count vs em for the same
traffic. Both drivers support a broad range of features like h
tarom...@gmail.com [tarom...@gmail.com] wrote:
> This is a really interesting thread.
>
> From my novice perspective, I wonder if the interrupt load actually makes a
> difference on the performance of OpenBGPd on different hardware as bge or em.
>
A higher interrupt load makes the CPU busy runn
601 - 700 of 735 matches
Mail list logo
