Bart Kus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > 11a (OFDM) doesn't work on CM9 (or newer cards), reverse engineering the > > HAL is not easy at all > > How about the Ubiquiti Networks SR2 & SR5? I'm guessing since they're > both AR5213-based, neither of them would work in 11g/11a respectively. >
Yeah, it's the same Atheros chip as the CM9 > Is there an option to use the binary HAL instead? > Considering that the driver was originally written to use it, that could be done. The HAL is basically where a lot of magic numbers are used to initialize different versions of the chip. Unfortunately people have to take steps like this just to figure out how the chip works. Apparently Atheros thinks the general public is too stupid or malicious to have direct access to the chip and be able to do things like change frequencies or whatever. I wonder if Teresa Meng would find this attitude to be in the original spirit that she founded the company with. Maybe some calls to her at Stanford could open up some more possibilities. This situation is very annoying. -- "You were about to change the channel when God healed you" -- Benny Hinn
