Hello everyone.. I am fairly new to the patching format.. so I just decided to
post a basic info
about how to remove group1 and group14 diffie key exchange in OpenSSH.
I know that they are listed as required in RFC 4253 but I don't want a client
to have the choice
to use a 1024 bit prime for the k
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 05:18:13PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I have a slight problem trying to compile a program on an i386 box that has
> > 3.9 installed. The box until recently ran 4.0-beta but I installed the
> > base packages as well as comp.tgz from the 3.9 on it. It now runs on a 3.9
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 07:47:12PM -0500, Exal de jesus Garcia Carrillo wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi list, does anyone knows which is the apropiate way for a
> .forward on openbsd?, I have tryed with "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail
> -f- || exit 75 #exal" b
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:48:05 -0700
Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's true. What all the people say about our mailing
> lists is exactly true. There really are about 30-40 people here who
> carry out an agenda of hate, quite successfully.
Couldn't have been said better!!
Exal de jesus Garcia Carrillo writes:
> .forward on openbsd?, I have tryed with "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail
> -f- || exit 75 #exal" but doesn't work.
/usr/bin/procmail? The port/package installs procmail in /usr/local/bin
// marc
I started with OBSD 2.5, reading a book on making an invisible
firewall. I remember because my associate flew up from Orange County CA
to SF to show me and my friend how to install openbsd on the quick
(basically get through fdisk and cylinder settings). Didn't even order
pizza, we were serio
( I have a sick sense of humor)
I want to pass on the cheapest and coolest method I've found to hook up
the serial port on a LANDISK box PLUS my original setup. I've posted both
methods.
The original method:
I have a Plextor PX-EH25L sitting in the office which I ordered the day I
saw mickey's p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list, does anyone knows which is the apropiate way for a
.forward on openbsd?, I have tryed with "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f-
|| exit 75 #exal" but doesn't work.
anyone?, thanks.
.
iD8DBQFFnE6VoZmxoVJRtGIRAtQ5AJ9IkQ7fjc5fxUqRrZj/OFF
> Get real, meta postings (postings about other postings) also build
> this misc community. You cannot expect a channel to carry 100% data
> (relevance),
What should we insist on?
How about 20%?
Or can we aim higher?
Nope. We can't aim higher when there are people like you, full of
hate, and
Get real, meta postings (postings about other postings) also build
this misc community. You cannot expect a channel to carry 100% data
(relevance), there is always some kind of sync (messages that show all
kinds of "borders") necessary.
This list is definitely not hurt by messages like these o
Just to follow up to myself here - I am more and more convinced this is me
screwing up my rules some how. I just can't see where I am making the
mistake.
Here is what I did:
on the tun interface:
18:28:54.271507 10.255.253.37.49359 > 10.10.80.116.135: S
1541251005:1541251005(0) win 8192
(DF)
18
On 1/3/07, Karl R. Balsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The misc list was the most helpful place to learn. Imagine, asking Jason
Wright and Angeleos Keromytis and Daniel Hartmeier direct questions
about 'bridge' (jason wrote it), Encryption (angeleos was the expert in
it), or Packet Filtering (
Diana Eichert wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:07:16 +0100, "Patrick Useldinger"
SNIP
True. I'm currently evaluating OpenBSD and I am trying to understand the
mindset of OpenBSD users by reading the newsgroups. And this thread *is*
strange.
Patrick, I guess I don't understand why someone
> I have a slight problem trying to compile a program on an i386 box that has
> 3.9 installed. The box until recently ran 4.0-beta but I installed the
> base packages as well as comp.tgz from the 3.9 on it. It now runs on a 3.9
> kernel as well. However I have this problem, when I compile I get
Hi misc@,
I have a slight problem trying to compile a program on an i386 box that has
3.9 installed. The box until recently ran 4.0-beta but I installed the
base packages as well as comp.tgz from the 3.9 on it. It now runs on a 3.9
kernel as well. However I have this problem, when I compile I
And if anyone wanted my opinion, I am fine with the occasional (but
rare) job posting which is polite, to the point, and relevant to
OpenBSD.
But I am not OK with all the whiners and lamers who followed up on
that posting with trash talk. That's about 35 postings so far, it
looks like. And I fee
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Christopher Snell wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I apologize if my posting offended anyone. That really was not my
> intent. I *do* read this list regularly, attend OpenBSD-related
SNIP
> Chris
Nah, no apology needed, except perhaps an apology from myself, since I
never intended this
On 1/3/07, Kenny Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
His response was a bit rude, however at least the courtesy was made to
attempt a reading on the rules page. He made the best decision he could
given the information he had.
Hi All,
I apologize if my posting offended anyone. That really was not
Hello,
I have a very odd problem with a VPN machine. The situation:
Net 1 --- Host 1 - Internet - Host 2 --- Net 2
\
+- Host 3 --- Net 3
The whole thing was working since the days of 3.5 or so with ISAKMPD
and X.509 certificate
Peace, and to move on,
I don't know if that's any good or not or even needed really. But like
many wanted "How To" saying it would be much better, however the results
are not overwhelming, but peace came from it anyway. Here is a place for
your job(s) offer instead of your jobs@, etc if you th
For once, I'm going to say this from my position as an OpenBSD
developer who has sunk countless hours into writing code for this OS.
It's obvious a lot of wankers around here have nothing better to do than
start threads based on that job offer.
I am perfectly happy with someone posting a job of
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:07:16 +0100, "Patrick Useldinger"
SNIP
> True. I'm currently evaluating OpenBSD and I am trying to understand the
> mindset of OpenBSD users by reading the newsgroups. And this thread *is*
> strange.
Patrick, I guess I don't understand why someone would need to "understand
t
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:07:16 +0100, "Patrick Useldinger"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> > The real problem is that when outsiders stumble into our newsgroups,
> > we shriek, "Ni! Ni!" and
> > demand another shrubbery. Maybe we should just chill out a bit.
>
> True. I'm curren
Kenny Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> His response was a bit rude, however at least the courtesy was made to
> attempt a reading on the rules page. He made the best decision he could
> given the information he had.
No, he posted to the openbsd "user questions and answers" list something
that
On 1/3/07, Patrick Useldinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> The real problem is that when outsiders stumble into our newsgroups,
> we shriek, "Ni! Ni!" and
> demand another shrubbery. Maybe we should just chill out a bit.
True. I'm currently evaluating OpenBSD and I am trying
On 1/3/07, Patrick Useldinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> The real problem is that when outsiders stumble into our newsgroups,
> we shriek, "Ni! Ni!" and
> demand another shrubbery. Maybe we should just chill out a bit.
True. I'm currently evaluating OpenBSD and I am trying
On 1/3/07, Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here, here! I agree with Diana! Now go away with your silly questions!
> Why would anyone want to work for you?
E... unemployement?
*pshaw* I laugh at your unemployment! Nothing builds character like
hard work and adversity!
<- he who
* Patrick Useldinger wrote:
> Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> >The real problem is that when outsiders stumble into our newsgroups,
> >we shriek, "Ni! Ni!" and
> >demand another shrubbery. Maybe we should just chill out a bit.
>
> True. I'm currently evaluating OpenBSD and I am trying to understand the
Hi Dave,
Dave Ewart wrote on Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 01:32:04PM +:
> I'm fairly new to OpenBSD right now and at the stage where I'm
> trying to understand the differences between what I've been used
> to in the past (typically Debian) and OpenBSD.
Welcome. :-)
> One thing I'm curious about is
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
The real problem is that when outsiders stumble into our newsgroups,
we shriek, "Ni! Ni!" and
demand another shrubbery. Maybe we should just chill out a bit.
True. I'm currently evaluating OpenBSD and I am trying to understand the
mindset of OpenBSD users by reading the
The real problem is that when outsiders stumble into our newsgroups,
we shriek, "Ni! Ni!" and
demand another shrubbery. Maybe we should just chill out a bit.
On Jan 3, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Kenny Mann wrote:
> Adam wrote:
>> Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> IMHO allowing employers
On Jan 3, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Kenny Mann wrote:
I'm failing to understand why this is such a big deal... I must be
missing something.
Some people enjoy patronizing others. It makes them feel better
about themselves.
--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
On Jan 3, 2007, at 2:04 PM, Bob DeBolt wrote:
OpenBSD 4.0 stable
Greets
What are some of the failover times people are getting using carp /
pfsync when the plug gets pulled from one of the units.
I've generally seen 2-3 seconds for the initial failover. Recovery
is virtually instantaneo
Adam wrote:
Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMHO allowing employers to seek out OBSD admins for employment helps
further encourage OBSD use.
misc@ is not for encouraging openbsd use, that's what advocacy@ is for.
"Promoting the use of OpenBSD. Non-technical discussions in /m
Adam,
Allowing the infrequent 'non-poop' job offering without an insane thread
like this one is inadvertent encouragement, not tacit advocacy. It
supports a friendlier environment than, let's say, you would provide.
Heaven forbid this list ever become even slightly friendly, we just
might all spo
> Here, here! I agree with Diana! Now go away with your silly questions!
> Why would anyone want to work for you?
E... unemployement?
I am having a issue that I am having some issues tracking down, and could
use a good shove in the right direction.
On OBSD 3.9 with PF and OpenVPN 2.0.5 I am getting some odd traffic.
OpenVPN runs over a tun interface, tcpdump is showing me:
11:33:41.980730 10.255.253.37.49664 > 10.10.80.116.135
OpenBSD 4.0 stable
Greets
What are some of the failover times people are getting using carp /
pfsync when the plug gets pulled from one of the units.
BobD
(I'm posting this for the archives.)
Thanks to a donation from Steven Fettig we have fixed the problem
with using the keyboard at the boot> prompt. This is in CVS, and
in the latest snapshots.
The keyboard does work under OpenBSD (including the installer), as
long as ACPI is used. The keyboard
Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO allowing employers to seek out OBSD admins for employment helps
> further encourage OBSD use.
misc@ is not for encouraging openbsd use, that's what advocacy@ is for.
> So why can't there be a jobs@ or something similar? Is there a
> philosophical re
Tom has a point and it's too bad more people don't take his view. I've
read this list for a number
of years and it always amazes me when people reply and make a big deal
over it as opposed to
simply ignoring it or using the delete key. While I believe that replies
are necessary with repeated
i
i'm using openbsd with apache and mod_proxy over 4 years in
several appications as reverseproxy and it works fine.
(owa, several asp applications and normal websites).
if you need help, you can contact me.
Thomas
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 14:45, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2007
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2007/01/03 16:37, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> > It is certainly better using the "sftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]" syntax, but
> > sometimes
> > I miss the "user@" part on the command line when the login name on the
> > remote system is different to t
On 2007/01/03 16:37, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> It is certainly better using the "sftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]" syntax, but
> sometimes
> I miss the "user@" part on the command line when the login name on the
> remote system is different to the one I am using locally.
How about this instead?
$ cat >> ~/.ss
Soner Tari schrieb:
Hi All,
On my network, ASP sites are served on a Microsoft IIS, and PHP sites
are on OpenBSD Apache, and there is only one Internet connection with a
single IP (all DNS records point to this IP). Since these web servers
run on different hardware/IPs, I need to distribute http
On 01/03/07 01:22, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Christopher Snell wrote:
And who appointed you list manager? My post was permitted based on my
reading of the rules in http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html.
Chrris
Same person who appoints people like you to respond the way you do.
Hello.
I would like to ask if there are plans to implement the "-l" option
available in ssh(1) on the secure file transfer program sftp(1).
It is certainly better using the "sftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]" syntax, but sometimes
I miss the "user@" part on the command line when the login name on the
remote
Thanks for all the replies, public and private. They've provided plenty
to work on.
Soner Tari wrote:
Hi All,
On my network, ASP sites are served on a Microsoft IIS, and PHP sites
are on OpenBSD Apache, and there is only one Internet connection with a
single IP (all DNS records point to this IP). Since these web servers
run on different hardware/IPs, I need to distribute http r
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Diana Eichert
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:03 AM
> To: OpenBSD
> Subject: OT Was: Wanted: OpenBSD Systems Administrator
>
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
>
> > Tom Bombadil wrote:
>
On 1/3/07, Dave Ewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One thing I'm curious about is managing locally-maintained applications.
Under Debian, anything that was core to the system went into /usr/bin,
as did any Debian-supplied packages. In Debian, the location /usr/local
is, by policy, never touched by
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:11:31PM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
>
> I could not find another reverse proxy package among OpenBSD
> ports/packages (Q3: is there any other reverse proxy package?).
>
For my simple setup, vanilla squid does it.
$ pkg_info | fgrep squid
squid-2.5.STABLE13 WWW and FTP p
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Chris C. wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've got a ne2000 based Card which shows up as ne1 (BNC) and ne3 (RJ45).
> Unter linux I can assign an ip address to a bridge:
>
> brctl show
> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
> br0 8000.
IMHO allowing employers to seek out OBSD admins for employment helps
further encourage OBSD use. Simply telling employers that they aren't
welcome fosters a negative attitude that, to me, doesn't encourage OBSD
use. But I could see the fine line of 'head-hunter poop' being crossed
way too easily, o
Hi
I've got a ne2000 based Card which shows up as ne1 (BNC) and ne3 (RJ45).
Unter linux I can assign an ip address to a bridge:
brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.0016b6a3ee35 no vlan0
On 2007/01/03 15:11, Soner Tari wrote:
> On my network, ASP sites are served on a Microsoft IIS, and PHP sites
> are on OpenBSD Apache, and there is only one Internet connection with a
> single IP (all DNS records point to this IP). Since these web servers
> run on different hardware/IPs, I need to
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> Tom Bombadil wrote:
> > The just guy sent one single e-mail asking if a bsd user wanted a job,
> > which I bet many among us might be interested.
>
> I've certainly heard from consulting customers who got my info from the
> consultants page at OpenBSD ...
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 20:03 -0700, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> postings and headhunter poop of course ... Why should we chase away
> employers
> looking for experts in our slightly arcane and recondite OBSD environment?
What about a jobs@ mailing-list?
ciao
Luca
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:11:31PM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On my network, ASP sites are served on a Microsoft IIS, and PHP sites
> are on OpenBSD Apache, and there is only one Internet connection with a
> single IP (all DNS records point to this IP). Since these web servers
> run on
I'm fairly new to OpenBSD right now and at the stage where I'm
trying to understand the differences between what I've been used to in
the past (typically Debian) and OpenBSD.
One thing I'm curious about is managing locally-maintained applications.
Under Debian, anything that was core to the system
Soner Tari wrote:
Hi All,
On my network, ASP sites are served on a Microsoft IIS, and PHP sites
are on OpenBSD Apache, and there is only one Internet connection with a
single IP (all DNS records point to this IP). Since these web servers
run on different hardware/IPs, I need to distribute http r
Hi All,
On my network, ASP sites are served on a Microsoft IIS, and PHP sites
are on OpenBSD Apache, and there is only one Internet connection with a
single IP (all DNS records point to this IP). Since these web servers
run on different hardware/IPs, I need to distribute http requests based
on the
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 12:15:51AM +, Ray wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to build a new bsd.rd that is used to boot over pxe and install
> a
> system.
>
> To start, I need to test building the bsd.rd without any changes to files
> such
> as install.sh, etc...
>
> If I run Make, t
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 02:37:34 -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
>On Tuesday 02 January 2007 13:09, Christopher Snell wrote:
>> Screening Questions:
>>
>> 1. Based on the following statements (props to Lewis Carroll), answer
>> the following questions:
>>
>> a. What can you logically conclude from these sta
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 13:09, Christopher Snell wrote:
Screening Questions:
1. Based on the following statements (props to Lewis Carroll), answer
the following questions:
a. What can you logically conclude from these statements?
b. Explain how you
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:37:34AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> the same time, I see nothing wrong with the occasional job posting to
FWIW, I agree to short posts.
As this list is subscibed to globally, please state if you expect a
person to appear in the flesh, and therefore where the job is lo
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 13:09, Christopher Snell wrote:
> Screening Questions:
>
> 1. Based on the following statements (props to Lewis Carroll), answer
> the following questions:
>
> a. What can you logically conclude from these statements?
>
> b. Explain how you came to this conclusion (bonus
67 matches
Mail list logo
