Diana Eichert wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:07:16 +0100, "Patrick Useldinger"
SNIP
True. I'm currently evaluating OpenBSD and I am trying to understand the
mindset of OpenBSD users by reading the newsgroups. And this thread *is*
strange.

Patrick, I guess I don't understand why someone would need to "understand
the mindset of OpenBSD users" in order to evaluate the O/S.  Evaluate it
for what it does well.  I use it for a variety of services, DNS servers,
packet filter, VPN server.  All these in production environment because it
"just workds".
Yeah, I agree, especially hearing this come from someone who has been involved with the project for so long.

'understand the mindset' of users is perhaps elusive anyhow, -it's perhaps a social approach to a computing intent. my mindset for so long with regard to openbsd was that is a was a perfect academic focus whereas my interest in linux was hard to pursue due to the fact it was so much broader of a scope -openbsd was just modular enough to actually be good at what it intended. Linux had alot more stuff going on, -a hardcore Java community on one side, a hardcore gamer element on another side, and deep-end web 1.0/2.0 stuff going on in yet another quarter. It was really hard to get answers sometimes because there were simply so many lists, all hosted by different folks.

I first learned openbsd in-depth and then shifted the portable unix knowledge to linux, and found life much easier. I studied the network tools and daemons, -and security.

The misc list was the most helpful place to learn. Imagine, asking Jason Wright and Angeleos Keromytis and Daniel Hartmeier direct questions about 'bridge' (jason wrote it), Encryption (angeleos was the expert in it), or Packet Filtering (daniel wrote it) and getting back detailed responses. To be able to walk up to my boss and say "I just talked with the maintainers of the tools we run and they confirmed our hunch, -we can proceed with "x" if "y" criteria are met". Talk about a huge difference with calling a vendor and paying to talk to a trainee looking at a database entry that might not even be relevant.

The misc@ list is actually a pretty helpful list when used in the way
it's defined, "User questions and answers, general questions".  See here,
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&r=1&b=200701&w=2 , for a good
archive.

g.day

diana


Past hissy-fits are not a predictor of future hissy-fits.
Nick Holland(06 Dec 2005)

Reply via email to