Hello Tom:
How much credence do you think there is to this following thought -
That since Marx was 'working things out' in 'Grundrisse' he simply developed
his arguments in a differing way. For example the page-half of the start of
what became 'The Commodity" in Volume 1 as Chapter 1?
Thanks for
Amen!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#35305): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35305
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111263102/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replyin
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 05:26 PM, Charlie wrote:
>
> Exactly the wrong way to "evaluate" and operate. What counts is not text
> versus text. What counts is which concepts model real life the best. Your
> textualism is a firm opposite to materialism.
Do you have a crush on me, Charlie?
-=-=-=-=
Mark thank you for posting the OTHER link that actually did provide some
information and what you posted by way of an explanation. The initial link
doesn't even mention "green line" or any, at all, of the issues involved. It
was merely about the Resolution up before the Portland city council.
W
> On Feb 18, 2025, at 6:38 PM, David Walters via groups.io
> wrote:
>
> I'm not against them all if we actually need them since we will need tons of
> fossil fuels to get off of high carbon generation and transportation.
But what makes you think that the capitalists are not burning addition
> On Feb 18, 2025, at 5:26 PM, Charlie via groups.io
> wrote:
>
> What counts is which concepts model real life the best.
Reasonable and informed people can - and do - disagree on that. So often people
will ask which components Marx thought modeled real life the best. Now we are
in the rea
I never saw it coming, Mark. The term is theirs, not mine. If you follow Saito
and Foster, it is a term they use. But it should be discussed more fully,
obviously.
David
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#35298): https://gr
> On Feb 18, 2025, at 2:54 PM, David Walters via groups.io
> wrote:
>
> I never saw it coming, Mark. The term is theirs, not mine. If you follow
> Saito and Foster, it is a term they use. But it should be discussed more
> fully, obviously.
>
It is "degrowth."
Mark
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Walker: 'Marx was always "working things out" and thus it is unwise to pick a
sentence from this 1852 letter or a passage from that 1859 preface as the
definitive statement of "Historical Materialism." That isn't how I operate.
When I cite a passage from the Grundrisse, it is not because th
The Purge of the Deep State and the Road to Dictatorship
The Purge of the Deep State and the Road to Dictatorship
Donald Trump’s dismantling of the deep state presages the formation of
something far worse.
The Trump administration’s war with the deep state is not a purgative. It is
not about
https://lis-isl.org/en/2025/02/17/conspiracion-del-imperialismo-norteamericano-y-ruso-a-espaldas-de-ucrania/
A conspiracy of American and Russian imperialisms behind the back of Ukraine.
The transformation of the “world order” has begun
By Oleg Vernik, Leadership of the Independent Trade Union of
hari kumar asked:
> How much credence do you think there is to this following thought -
> That since Marx was 'working things out' in 'Grundrisse' he simply
> developed his arguments in a differing way.
Absolutely, Marx was always "working things out" and thus it is unwise to
pick a sentence fro
[I want to address Mark B.'s new, it seems, adherence to de-development
separately.]
I wanted to respond to the "nuclear energy equals nuclear WMD" urban legend(s).
There IS a connection between civilian nuclear energy and nuclear weapons bit
is not what anyone thinks on this list. The only cou
> On Feb 17, 2025, at 9:31 PM, Ben Seattle via groups.io
> wrote:
>
> My post also criticized Proyect's approval for the maneuvers of these "corn
> fed" bureaucrats in their treachery.
I wasn't on the list or following it back then, but I talked to Louis a few
times a year. We talked about
FYI.
Friend,
I'm attending an event called Support the Resolution Against Zenith Energy!.
For too long, the City of Portland has refused to take action to protect
Portlanders from the hazardous fossil fuels of Houston-based Zenith Energy.
Since Zenith's 2022 LUCS approval, City officials have
I'm reminded of this interview:
https://www.democracynow.org/2024/12/27/greenland_trump_colonialism
Greenlanders want control over their natural resources, and to have multiple
clients to choose between and get leverage over.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages se
Hedges is the king of jeremiads but there is much truth in it as well.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#35283): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35283
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111238967/21656
-=-=-
POSTING R
> On Feb 18, 2025, at 11:16 AM, David Walters via groups.io
> wrote:
>
> Mark both in your post and the link you provided I don't see anything
> specific they are opposing except the general anti-fossil fuel perspective.
> Can you explain?
Sorry, that posting doesn't meet our informational
*Friedenskanzler*, i.e. Chancellor of Peace. If we tell you that’s what
Hitler was called before he started the Second World War, you won’t believe
your ears. And yet it’s true, because the image of a “pacifist” Hitler was
cultivated not only by his acolytes, but also by those Europeans – and they
> On Feb 18, 2025, at 8:58 AM, David Walters via groups.io
> wrote:
>
> I want to address Mark B.'s new, it seems, adherence to de-development
> separately.
You make it sound like "new adherence" is a bad thing, David. And it's not
de-development.
Mark
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io L
Some of the most fervent pushback to Donald Trump’s plan for Gaza is coming
from the same people, institutions, and newsrooms that refused to
challenge, and even supported, the mass slaughter of Palestinians during
the Biden administration. What we find is that there is a manufacturing of
a moral h
Hi folks,
-- 1 --
First, I would like to thank John Reimann and Mark Baugher for catching and
correcting my error re: the number of MarxMail subscribers. I am not sure how
I managed to make that error. I will correct this when I next update the PDF.
-- 2 --
John commented on the role of the
Mark both in your post and the link you provided I don't see anything specific
they are opposing except the general anti-fossil fuel perspective. Can you
explain?
David
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#35291): https://gro
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:48 PM, Tom Walker wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 04:29 PM, Mark Baugher wrote:
>
>> And this calls into question another quotation from Marx's 1859 Critique
>> of Political Economy:
>>
>> "At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of
>> soc
See also
https://newworker.us/international/heading-for-war-the-china-u-s-rivalry-over-greenland/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#35293): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35293
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111
On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 04:29 PM, Mark Baugher wrote:
>
> And this calls into question another quotation from Marx's 1859 Critique
> of Political Economy:
>
> "At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of
> society come into conflict with the existing relations of product
How does that work out when thru align themselves in 2018 with despicable
Coumo?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/05/nyregion/andrew-cuomo-working-families-party.html
On Tuesday, February 18, 2025, workerpoet via groups.io wrote:
> " our movement is polarized between the path of subservience to
[Edited Message Follows]
" our movement is polarized between the path of subservience to the Democrats
and the path of independent class politics."
Much of this has to do with how we can most effectively use the options we have
while and looking to independent possibilities in the future. Joe
" our movement is polarized between the path of subservience to the Democrats
and the path of independent class politics."
Much of this has to do with how we can most effectively use the options we have
while and looking to independent possibilities in the future. Joe Sims,
co-chair of the CPU
It is what it is NOW but if enough of us join it, we can transform it -- this
seems to me a far more rational tactic than the delusions that we can either
take over the Democrats or that we can build a Communist party into the mass
movement needed anytime soon. As far as the WFP, I have no loya
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/18/us/politics/fda-cdc-health-department-trump.html
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#35280): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35280
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111251503/21656
-=
U.S. intelligence has concluded that the odds of an Israeli attack on
Iran’s nuclear program in the next few months are high, according to major
American media, but the jury is out on whether Israel can destroy its
archfoe’s nuclear facilities on its own.
Iran is widely believed to be at its *weak
https://tomdispatch.com/the-heart-or-graphite-of-greed/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#35282): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35282
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111252125/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1
33 matches
Mail list logo
