Mark thank you for posting the OTHER link that actually did provide some information and what you posted by way of an explanation. The initial link doesn't even mention "green line" or any, at all, of the issues involved. It was merely about the Resolution up before the Portland city council.
We had 10 years ago a similar fight over a coal export terminal proposed and defeated in Oakland, CA. See: https://nocoalinoakland.info/our-campaign/ ( https://nocoalinoakland.info/our-campaign/ ) though a Judge in January of last year ruled it had to go through but in July ruled that the process had to continue through the appeals process. So the book is still out whether this will be built or not. I'm sure China and Japan are waiting these decisions. I'm not a big fan of fossil fuel export facilities at all. I'm not against them all if we actually need them since we will need tons of fossil fuels to get off of high carbon generation and transportation. But in most cases all such pipelines and facilities are for export that is, in order to profit off the higher paying international market. This is especially true of natural gas. The infamous Key Stone pipeline was designed to bring high quality crude from the Bekkan Oil in N. Dekota to Louisiana for export. David -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#35307): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35307 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111254721/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
