On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 08:50:50AM -0500, Christopher Menzel wrote:
> Estimable LyX developers,
>
> I am wondering about a relatively minor interface issue that seems to affect
> the Linux version of 2.4.0~beta5 but not the MacOS version, as illustrated in
> the attached graphics, when the "Extr
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 08:50:50AM -0500, Christopher Menzel wrote:
> I am wondering about a relatively minor interface issue that seems to affect
> the Linux version of 2.4.0~beta5 but not the MacOS version, as illustrated in
> the attached graphics, when the "Extra" icon set is placed verticall
Le 05/08/2016 à 12:54, racoon a écrit :
Sorry, missed your post. I have just a single icon there. So every
(non-submenu) item show an icon now. Replacing
qMenu.addAction(new Action(QIcon(), label(*m),
by, for example,
qMenu.addAction(new Action(QIcon("images/box-insert.svgz"), label(*m),
How
On 11.07.2016 21:24, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 11/07/2016 09:17, racoon a écrit :
On 15.06.2016 09:45, racoon wrote:
Hi,
I could not find a discussion on icons in menus. I tend to believe that
they help locating entries when scanning over a menu entry. But maybe
that's bogus. I think icons in
Le 11/07/2016 09:17, racoon a écrit :
On 15.06.2016 09:45, racoon wrote:
Hi,
I could not find a discussion on icons in menus. I tend to believe that
they help locating entries when scanning over a menu entry. But maybe
that's bogus. I think icons in menus are less popular on macOS [sic]
than on
On 15.06.2016 09:45, racoon wrote:
Hi,
I could not find a discussion on icons in menus. I tend to believe that
they help locating entries when scanning over a menu entry. But maybe
that's bogus. I think icons in menus are less popular on macOS [sic]
than on Windows and Linux. I am just throwing
Le 15/06/2016 à 09:45, racoon a écrit :
Hi,
I could not find a discussion on icons in menus. I tend to believe that
they help locating entries when scanning over a menu entry. But maybe
that's bogus. I think icons in menus are less popular on macOS [sic]
than on Windows and Linux. I am just thro
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 20:28, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> This is the announcement today:
>> "LibreOffice 3.3.1 also brings new colorful icons based on The Document
>> Foundation branding guidelines"
but these are the document icons, not toolbar icons i think...
Joost Verburg wrote:
> "Pavel Sanda" wrote in message
> news:20110223123315.gs26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz...
>> Edwin Leuven wrote:
>>> ps. does anyone know where the svg sources for the libreoffice icons
>>> can be found?
>>
>> at the bottom there are source files
>> http://wiki.documentfoun
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message
news:20110223123315.gs26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz...
Edwin Leuven wrote:
ps. does anyone know where the svg sources for the libreoffice icons
can be found?
at the bottom there are source files
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/LibreOffice_Initial_Ico
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> ps. does anyone know where the svg sources for the libreoffice icons
> can be found?
at the bottom there are source files
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/LibreOffice_Initial_Icons
for 3.3.1.
however quick peek at the page hints, that their are trying to drop old s
>> Is anyone planning to design a complete icon set for the standard toolbars
>> based on this LibreOffice style?
personally i think we need a consistent icon set
so if there is a consensus for dropping the old icons
we should choose oxygen, libreoffice, or tango and then just do the work
i am
"Rob Oakes" wrote in message
news:a5accdd7-6e23-47c6-9b16-d42583e6b...@oak-tree.us...
I spent a little bit of time trying to order the toolbar, based on the
conversation from the other day. Here is a first pass attempt which shows
the standard toolbar and a revised extras toolbar.
Good work!
Dear LyX Developers,
I spent a little bit of time trying to order the toolbar, based on the
conversation from the other day. Here is a first pass attempt which shows the
standard toolbar and a revised extras toolbar.
<>
In the standard toolbar, I've removed the file and the edit links. With t
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I think that Pavel is suggesting that only the default set of icons
> has to be mandatorily updated, meaning that the presence of other
> sets does not increase maintenance burden. They would be updated only
> by who cares about them.
yes that was my proposal. we can eve
Joost Verburg wrote:
> I think we should
> design something better and fix the usability issues with the current
> icons.
please do your best. i support your trying to make new default icons
which are compatible with some larger project like kde.
my request is connected, but pretty orthogonal -
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 06:47:24PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Pavel Sanda" wrote in message
>
> >- i dont see much harm to allow other sets. one more combobox in prefs...
>
> I don't agree that adding more options is a good thing. LyX already
> has too many options. Adding one more may seem l
- i dont see much harm to allow other sets. one more combobox in
prefs...
I don't agree that adding more options is a good thing. LyX already
has too many options. Adding one more may seem like an easy fix, but
if we keep accumulating more and more settings things get more
complicated for u
Op 22-2-2011 18:18, Joost Verburg schreef:
"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message
news:AANLkTino30Rzx3ZPti9G=h6uuvxrvmzv3wnaumaus...@mail.gmail.com...
Personally I was more happy with Edwin's set than the oxygen set, but
that is just based on taste.
Is anyone planning to design a complete
Pavel Sanda" wrote in message
news:20110222172309.ga28...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz...
you didnt get me right. i opposed to definitive killing of old icons for
people
who get used to them and want to continue using them. in the begining i
was
silent and prepared to 'fix' it locally for me, but s
Joost Verburg wrote:
> I'd also be interested to hear why you oppose the change of icons.
you didnt get me right. i opposed to definitive killing of old icons for people
who get used to them and want to continue using them. in the begining i was
silent and prepared to 'fix' it locally for me, but
"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message
news:AANLkTino30Rzx3ZPti9G=h6uuvxrvmzv3wnaumaus...@mail.gmail.com...
Personally I was more happy with Edwin's set than the oxygen set, but
that is just based on taste.
Is anyone planning to design a complete icon set for the standard toolbars
based on
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:09:28PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> "Pavel Sanda" wrote in message
> news:20110222152505.gm26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz...
> >as expected with the ui attempts majority of devs is hard to get.
> >as i count 2 dev against oxygen, third one rather created his own set ;)
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Joost Verburg wrote:
>> So here's a comparison of the current icons and the latest version of the
>> new ones. The new icons for foot/margin notes are now also finished.
>>
>> Perhaps everyone should just vote for old or new so we come to a
>>
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> third one rather created his own set ;)
which you can count as a vote against the old icons
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message
news:20110222152505.gm26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz...
as expected with the ui attempts majority of devs is hard to get.
as i count 2 dev against oxygen, third one rather created his own set ;)
Still I think it's good to hear the opinion of some more people outs
Joost Verburg wrote:
> So here's a comparison of the current icons and the latest version of the
> new ones. The new icons for foot/margin notes are now also finished.
>
> Perhaps everyone should just vote for old or new so we come to a
> conclusion?
as expected with the ui attempts majority of
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 15:36, Joost Verburg wrote:
> > Here's the new icon set I worked on with Jürgen! It's based on the Oxygen
> > style.
>
> attached some idea how it would look like with 16x16 icons from libreoffice...
yet another attempt. feel free to create images/th
Joost Verburg wrote:
> If the view document icon is added to the standard toolbar, the view
> toolbar can become an optional toolbar like version control and change
> tracking.
Yes, something like this. But it should dock right next to the view document
icon, if possible.
Another option would b
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message
news:201102220915.55759.sp...@lyx.org...
My proposal, instead of pressing all on one "minimal" toolbar is to
further
split these toolbars. Then, people can customize the UI to their needs
simply
by hiding toolbars they do not need.
If the view document i
Rob Oakes wrote:
> > As a frequent user of master-buffer-view and master-buffer-update (a
> > writer of, currently, primarily books), I'd disagree. These icons are
> > very important if you work on multi-part documents.
>
> I agree, and I understand. Nor am I advocating that we remove the feature
"Edwin Leuven" wrote in message
news:AANLkTi=dh3gj3zqvkwz6gaxeg6qpag-s1ppjddr7z...@mail.gmail.com...
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 15:36, Joost Verburg wrote:
Here's the new icon set I worked on with Jürgen! It's based on the Oxygen
style.
attached some idea how it would look like with 16x16 icons
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 05:39:13PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 15:36, Joost Verburg wrote:
> > Here's the new icon set I worked on with Jürgen! It's based on the Oxygen
> > style.
>
> attached some idea how it would look like with 16x16 icons from libreoffice...
Nice. M
Hi Edwin,
Thanks for the feedback, I really appreciate your thoughts.
>> A second weakness is that there are multiple ways to do the same
>> things. For example, all of the insets can also be added from the
>> "Insert" menu (for which there are usually convenient shortcuts that
>> can speed thin
Hi Jurgen,
> And here the problem starts. What are "the necessaries"? Whose "necessaries"?
> Who is the "average user"? A scientific writer who heavily uses math or one
> from the humanities who never needs math, but lots of citations, multiple
> indices, languages? A writer who writes papers o
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 15:36, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Here's the new icon set I worked on with Jürgen! It's based on the Oxygen
> style.
attached some idea how it would look like with 16x16 icons from libreoffice...
<>
"Rob Oakes" wrote in message
news:0a5aac7a-2fd2-4e25-9834-39e61557c...@oak-tree.us...
If we're going to give LyX a fresh coat of paint, why don't we deal with
some of the other UI concerns as well. For example, in addition to
improving the visual consistency of the icons, why not simplify the
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Why don't we also try and knock our default toolbar down to the
> > necessaries.
>
> the only ones i use are insert table and toggle outline, but the
> definititoin of necessity may vary across users
And here the problem starts. What are "the necessaries"? Whose "necessari
Rob Oakes wrote:
> why not simplify the toolbars.
the question is how
> (The menus are already very well organized and laid out.)
personally, i would not mind a separate math menu
> the designers I talked to all had a single question on first
> encountering the UI, "What do all the buttons do?
Oh, and one other question. Is there a place where I could download the
packaged Oxygen theme? I'm curious to play with it and see how it looks.
Cheers,
Rob
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> If I am the only one objecting, it is correct that I have to be the
> one using a local icon set.
i will be also using the old ones.
but as being said previously, there is solution which should satisfy both camps.
oxygen as default and possibility to switch to old one l
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
news:20110220155614.GE1772@GIOVE...
OK. But as we already have a consistent set of icons, why throwing out
of the window something that already required a huge amount of work?
There could simply be a new option "use the new, shiny, wonderful
oxygen icons"?
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 05:32:25PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> But I will leave this discussion now. If it is so difficult to come to a
> consensus, just leave everything as is. I will use my own icon set here
> locally, as I used to.
No, that's not correct. We have only heard a couple (
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> OK. But as we already have a consistent set of icons, why throwing out
> of the window something that already required a huge amount of work?
The current icon set is by no means consistent.
But I will leave this discussion now. If it is so difficult to come to a
consen
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Introducing more variants will reduce the
> > consistency and make it a lot harder to introduce new toolbars and
> > icons.
basically i didn't want to introduce more variants but to keep possible
the old set. its hardwired in my brain and its painful to reprogram it.
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:52:59PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > BTW you know that you can freely chose different icon sets at least on
> > > KDE and GNOME. But all these sets, no matter how different the design,
> > > stick to the default sizes, AFAICS.
> >
>
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:49:19PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Joost Verburg wrote:
> > > we would just create new dir
> > > "oxygen", or perhaps someone will prepare "tango" and "win".
> > > we would always try to load image from this directory and then have
> > > fallback
> > > to the ol
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:50:37PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > The old set was mostly neutral to the outer
> > environment (it fitted to KDE, Gnome or Win without much pain).
>
> No. The old icon set was a mixup of KDE2 icons, some self-designed icons
> from th
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:34:29PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> "Pavel Sanda" wrote in message
> news:20110220151223.ge26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz...
> >we would just create new dir
> >"oxygen", or perhaps someone will prepare "tango" and "win".
> >we would always try to load image from this
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > BTW you know that you can freely chose different icon sets at least on
> > KDE and GNOME. But all these sets, no matter how different the design,
> > stick to the default sizes, AFAICS.
>
> Ok, so we stick to one default size. Then, we should have 16x16 instead
> of 18
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> The old set was mostly neutral to the outer
> environment (it fitted to KDE, Gnome or Win without much pain).
No. The old icon set was a mixup of KDE2 icons, some self-designed icons from
the xforms age and some other icons from different sets. It was a mess, and it
wa
Joost Verburg wrote:
> > we would just create new dir
> > "oxygen", or perhaps someone will prepare "tango" and "win".
> > we would always try to load image from this directory and then have
> > fallback
> > to the old set if image not found. (i have no opinion about the default
> > loaded set).
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message
news:20110220151223.ge26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz...
we would just create new dir
"oxygen", or perhaps someone will prepare "tango" and "win".
we would always try to load image from this directory and then have
fallback
to the old set if image not found. (i hav
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:12:24PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Joost Verburg wrote:
> > Here's the new icon set I worked on with Jürgen! It's based on the Oxygen
> > style.
> > Shall I put it in?
>
> one question - is it really so difficult to fix "multiple icon sets" as well
> for 2.0?
I full
Joost Verburg wrote:
> Here's the new icon set I worked on with Jürgen! It's based on the Oxygen
> style.
> Shall I put it in?
one question - is it really so difficult to fix "multiple icon sets" as well
for 2.0?
we would just create new dir
"oxygen", or perhaps someone will prepare "tango" and
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:36:02PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Here's the new icon set I worked on with Jürgen! It's based on the
> Oxygen style.
> Shall I put it in?
Please, give me time to make a backup of the old set :)
--
Enrico (vocal anti-hero)
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
news:20110220143302.GB1772@GIOVE...
But your argument only holds for a *specific* size, as all other sizes
are obtained by scaling that specific size. So, what is the rationale of
having 16x16 instead of 18x18 if both are going to be scaled down from
the 22x2
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:00:52PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > It does not hold because only the sizes would be standard, not the icons
> > themselves, which are wildly different between OSes and even between
> > desktop environments in the same OS.
>
> Sure.
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message
news:201102191746.11671.sp...@lyx.org...
I think we should finally stick with the standard sizes (16x16, 22x22,
32x32,
48x48).
That is: increase smallIconSize from 14 to 16 and bigIconSize from 26 to
32.
Increasing the bigIconSize to 32 does not make se
> From: Jim Oldfield
>
> On Windows the ONLY standard toolbar icon size is 16x16, at least judging by
> Microsoft programs.
Sorry, I was wrong. They are 16x16 and 24x24. See the link below (especially
figure 4). However 16x16 is by far the most common in applications (as opposed
to uti
> From: Jürgen Spitzmüller
>
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > We are talking about toolbar icons here
>
> Yes, I was talking about standard toolbar icon sizes, as common on all OSes.
>
On Windows the ONLY standard toolbar icon size is 16x16, at least judging by
Microsoft programs. So it
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> It does not hold because only the sizes would be standard, not the icons
> themselves, which are wildly different between OSes and even between
> desktop environments in the same OS.
Sure. Where did I speak of default icons (or stock icons, for that matter)? I
always r
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:39:09AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > If it was possible to tell lyx to use standard OS icons, then your
> > proposable would be sensible. But it is not possible to do so.
> > I understand that you want to take advantage of already exist
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> If it was possible to tell lyx to use standard OS icons, then your
> proposable would be sensible. But it is not possible to do so.
> I understand that you want to take advantage of already existing
> icons sets, but you can only do that for some icons. In conclusion,
> t
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 06:07:37PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > We are talking about toolbar icons here
>
> Yes, I was talking about standard toolbar icon sizes, as common on all OSes.
If it was possible to tell lyx to use standard OS icons, then your
proposabl
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> We are talking about toolbar icons here
Yes, I was talking about standard toolbar icon sizes, as common on all OSes.
Jürgen
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 05:46:11PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > The big icons are 26 pixels. Anyway, 22 pixels icons now consume more
> > horizontal space and, unless your window is extended across the entire
> > screen width, it is not possible to have toolbars
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> The big icons are 26 pixels. Anyway, 22 pixels icons now consume more
> horizontal space and, unless your window is extended across the entire
> screen width, it is not possible to have toolbars completely visible.
> On the other hand, the small icons are way too small. O
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:19:05AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Joost Verburg wrote:
> > No, those are much bigger. 32 pixels I believe.
>
> ah, ok. p
The big icons are 26 pixels. Anyway, 22 pixels icons now consume more
horizontal space and, unless your window is extended across the entire
scree
Joost Verburg wrote:
> "Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message
> news:201102181239.57022.sp...@lyx.org...
>> Yes. I hacked some together myself. See attachment. They are certainly not
>> masterpieces, I mainly took some elements from existing icons, if
>> possible, to
>> have something halfway mat
Joost Verburg wrote:
> Thanks. Do you also have the 22x22 png versions?
Yep. Just sent to you privately.
Jürgen
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message
news:201102181239.57022.sp...@lyx.org...
Yes. I hacked some together myself. See attachment. They are certainly not
masterpieces, I mainly took some elements from existing icons, if
possible, to
have something halfway matching.
Thanks. Do you also have t
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message
news:201102181054.36078.sp...@lyx.org...
The icons I use are not the latest, I have done this some years back. Note
that some (the update PDF/master) are badly self-designed icons, since I
did
not find anythink appropriate back then. We should use somethin
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Joost Verburg wrote:
> > What about this to start with (see screenshot)?
>
> These are too fanciful/colourish for my taste.
i was just about to write they look better because are
more colorful :)
but i'll probably end up with my own set here, so no hard
opinion...
pav
Stephan Witt wrote:
> What about the hopping train image?
its on plan.pavel
Joost Verburg wrote:
> Where do I find the latest Oxygen set which contains the icons you're
> using here?
The icons I use are not the latest, I have done this some years back. Note
that some (the update PDF/master) are badly self-designed icons, since I did
not find anythink appropriate back t
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message
news:201102180850.11166.sp...@lyx.org...
+1 for Oxygen. It's a very well-designed, large and clean icon set. As a
bonus, Lyx would integrate even better into KDE.
Where do I find the latest Oxygen set which contains the icons you're using
here?
Joost
Joost Verburg wrote:
> What about this to start with (see screenshot)?
These are too fanciful/colourish for my taste.
Jürgen
Am 17.02.2011 um 23:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Joost Verburg wrote:
>> be nice to have at least a little bit of UI refresh for 2.0 :)
+1
> 2.0 is good excuse, but it should happen before RC. i would like to
> make freeze more strict once we enter it.
>
What about the hopping train image?
Steph
Joost Verburg wrote:
> No, those are much bigger. 32 pixels I believe.
ah, ok. p
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message
news:20110217230252.ga16...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz...
btw aren't those 22 pixels what you get if you just switch to "big" icons
via context menu?
pavel
No, those are much bigger. 32 pixels I believe.
Joost
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message
news:20110217224752.go26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz...
2.0 is good excuse, but it should happen before RC. i would like to
make freeze more strict once we enter it.
OK. Let's update the main icons now and leave further updates for 2.1.
just side notes:
- there
Joost Verburg wrote:
> The current LyX toolbar icons are blurred because the default icon size is
> set to 20x20 pixels, although most of our icons actually are 22x22 (this is
btw aren't those 22 pixels what you get if you just switch to "big" icons via
context menu?
pavel
Joost Verburg wrote:
> be nice to have at least a little bit of UI refresh for 2.0 :)
2.0 is good excuse, but it should happen before RC. i would like to
make freeze more strict once we enter it.
just side notes:
- there are related bugs #3149, #6540.
- also manuals need to be fixed.
pavel
"Rob Oakes" wrote in message
news:88f13752-72ca-4a77-83f1-13040e951...@oak-tree.us...
As a way of starting, you might take a look at some of the icons in the
Oxygen set or in the faenza set. We might also look at finding an artist
to create a custom set for LyX? Maybe for 2.1? The Ubuntu artw
> Is it OK if I increase the default size with 2 pixels and try to find some
> better public domain or GPL icons to replace some of the current ones? I'd be
> nice to have at least a little bit of UI refresh for 2.0 :)
I think that would be fantastic.
+1
As a way of starting, you might take a
Is it OK if I increase the default size with 2 pixels and try to find
some better public domain or GPL icons to replace some of the current
ones? I'd be nice to have at least a little bit of UI refresh for 2.0 :)
+1
Vincent
Hello,
I have a set of famfamfam silk icons
(http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/) plus a series of custom ones
adapted to LyX. See the screenshot here
(http://www.sciviews.org/LyX/Lyx_alticons.png).
The XMP icons for LyX 1.5.X are here:
http://www.sciviews.org/LyX/LyX1.5alticons.zip
Jürgen wrote:
> Rather than replacing our (also KDE-derived) icon set with another one, it
> would be worth investigating into the use of stock icons, i.e. using the icon
> theme currently used by the OS or DE.
i personally would really welcome an icon set based on a consistent palette and
design
Gwenael Gabard wrote:
> Hi, I haven't contributed to the development of Lyx so far but I was
> thinking of preparing an alternative set of icons. I had a quick look at
> the Crystal icons theme used in KDE and I think there are plenty of
> existing icons that can be used (some new icons will be nee
> "John" == John Spray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> I have now done this - at runtime lyx-gtk will get lots of nice
John> icons from installed themes. You'll probably need something like
John> gnome-icon-theme installed in order to see this. Anyway,
John> something to bear in mind for any
Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 14:59 + schrieb John C. Spray:
> I would point out that the GTK frontend uses GTK+ stock icons for things
> like load/save/search and so on. The point of this is to obey the
> user's theme. The qt frontend could do the same thing with KDE icons I
> suppose. There i
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, John C. Spray wrote:
>
> > By the way, I have a nicer, larger .png/alpha application icon for lyx
> > (than the little xpm) which is good for people using big icons on panels
> > and so on. I can find it (on my home machine) if
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, John C. Spray wrote:
> By the way, I have a nicer, larger .png/alpha application icon for lyx
> (than the little xpm) which is good for people using big icons on panels
> and so on. I can find it (on my home machine) if anyone's interested in
> including it in 1.4.
I was goi
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 15:36 +0100, Frederic-Emmanuel PICCA wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 03:05:42PM +0100, Leuven, E. wrote:
> >>* the icons are extremely ugly (and very inconsistent in style)
> > We badly need an artist on staff.
>
> What about using the same icones than
> "Elena" == Elena Samsonova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Elena> People, here are three icons for the toolbar that I made. Feel
Elena> free to include them into the distribution if you like.
I put them in cvs (I just changed the background to be transparent).
THanks.
JMarc
96 matches
Mail list logo
