On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 05:46:11PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > The big icons are 26 pixels. Anyway, 22 pixels icons now consume more > > horizontal space and, unless your window is extended across the entire > > screen width, it is not possible to have toolbars completely visible. > > On the other hand, the small icons are way too small. Only some of > > the icons were bigger than 20 pixels and they were looking better when > > scaled down, IMHO. > > Any objection to also increase the size of small icons as a compromise > > for those not agreeing with the move to 22 pixels normal icons? > > I think we should finally stick with the standard sizes (16x16, 22x22, 32x32, > 48x48). > > That is: increase smallIconSize from 14 to 16 and bigIconSize from 26 to 32.
We are talking about toolbar icons here, and even 26 pixels is too much, IMHO. However, as there may be people using lyx on small screen devices, even the 14 pixels icons could be useful. So, I change my proposal to introduce a medium 18 pixels size, such that to have 14, 18, 22, and 26 pixel sizes. -- Enrico (vocal anti-hero)
