Re: enabling hunspell on linux (was: Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released)

Hello After all the troubles that I went through to get Hunspell to work with LyX on my Linux box, I went ahead and created a 'Hunspell' page on the wiki documenting some of the steps needed to correctly configure Hunspell with LyX. [1] Regards Liviu [1] http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Hunspell On Th

Re: enabling hunspell on linux (was: Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released)

Am 29.09.2011 um 22:54 schrieb Liviu Andronic: > I also managed to use > /usr/local/build/lyx-hunspell/dicts > > which contains the Hunspell dictionaries as hosted on the LyX SVN. Fine. > > A note: after changing the Hunspell Path it is mandatory to restart > LyX for the new settings to take e

Re: enabling hunspell on linux (was: Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released)

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > The hunspelldir_path in preferences is incorrect. Here (ubuntu) it is > > /usr/share/myspell/dicts > That's correct. I did manage to screw the path when trying the system dictionaries. I tested and I get Hunspell working with both /usr/share/m

Re: enabling hunspell on linux (was: Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released)

Am 29.09.2011 um 12:57 schrieb Liviu Andronic: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> I'm almost sure Hunspell with enchant doesn't use the dictionaries in >> "/usr/local/build/lyx-hunspell/dicts". >> > Yes, for sure. However I couldn't make LyX work with default Hunspell > di

Re: enabling hunspell on linux (was: Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released)

Am Donnerstag, 29. September 2011 schrieb Liviu Andronic: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > > I'm almost sure Hunspell with enchant doesn't use the dictionaries in > > "/usr/local/build/lyx-hunspell/dicts". > > Yes, for sure. However I couldn't make LyX work with default Hu

Re: enabling hunspell on linux (was: Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released)

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > I'm almost sure Hunspell with enchant doesn't use the dictionaries in > "/usr/local/build/lyx-hunspell/dicts". > Yes, for sure. However I couldn't make LyX work with default Hunspell dictionaries. I'm suspecting user error, but I still can't m

Re: enabling hunspell on linux (was: Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released)

Am 28.09.2011 um 23:46 schrieb Liviu Andronic: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> At runtime LyX needs to find the dictionaries. Did you set the path in the >> preferences? Alternatively you may copy them from LyX's SVN repository >> in dictionaries/dicts to the subdirectory

enabling hunspell on linux (was: Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released)

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > At runtime LyX needs to find the dictionaries. Did you set the path in the > preferences? Alternatively you may copy them from LyX's SVN repository > in dictionaries/dicts to the subdirectory dicts in the system directory of > LyX. > You may c

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 20:17, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Now I uninstalled LyX2.0.1 (because I also wanted to test the uninstaller). Now my .lyx files can't be opened by double-click and they don't have the lyx logo anymore. Sure, because you decided to uninstall LyX. We must therefore delete all

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

need to change to get the folder name changed. 8. Joost's LyX2.0 installer installed in the folder Program Files/LyX20. The merged installer in Program Files/LyX 2.0.1. Can we please have the same directory for newer installers? Preferably without all the version numbers. This is not possible,

Re: LyX ppa - was [ANNOUNCE] LyX 2.0.1 Released

Hi Bjorn, > Ok...I guess it is possible to climb a learning curve that tangents the > Matterhorn...(?) Thanks for your guidance :-) Possible, yes, but deeply miserable. This is why I always get into it four or five hours and throw my hands up in disgust. Regarding stuff, here are some things

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released

Hello Stephan On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 07.09.2011 um 12:30 schrieb Liviu Andronic: >> I'm curious as to why this is needed? > > This is not on purpose... it's the current behavior because there is no > standard for the location of the hunspell dictionaries. You ma

Is It Possible to Provide a Windows Installer for LyX 2.0.1? Thanks. Ahmed EOM

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

For example all graphic programs go to the folder "graphics", text editors and word processors go to "text". Our installer is proposing the default location in the base tree: "~\LyX 2.0.1" but user might want to have it in "~\text\LyX 2.0.1" This can also be

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 08:35, schrieb Liviu Andronic: 6. Joost had a reason to not allow to start the application from the installer. Isn't this a problem now anymore ? I don't know what you are referring to. This has been discussed earlier on the list. Now the last page of the installer (before hitt

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released

Am 07.09.2011 um 12:30 schrieb Liviu Andronic: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> So configure could detect the location of header and library and the final >> binary should provide the hunspell spellchecker backend. >> > Yes, it seems so. I can select Hunspell in Prefs. >

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > So configure could detect the location of header and library and the final > binary should provide the hunspell spellchecker backend. > Yes, it seems so. I can select Hunspell in Prefs. >> Am I doing something wrong or is there some incompati

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 um 13:19 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Le 06/09/11 12:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : >> Now, this causes the translation of languageTestString() to be cached. >> If we try to load all languages to see whether they are available, the >> cached value is thus pretty much random.

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 um 17:57 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > Op 6-9-2011 15:11, Stephan Witt schreef: >> Am 06.09.2011 um 13:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: >> >>> >>> When I was still young and naive about this problem, I suspected a cache >>> problem. Therefore I tried to disable completely th

Re: Instant preview does not work for lyx 2.0.1 for OSX

the line \def\Master {} each of the preambles of the child documents contains the lines \ifx \Master\undefined \input{../Preambles/Preamble_Standard} \input{../Preambles/Preamble_tikz} \fi In both LyX 2.0.0 and LyX 2.0.1 the "view master document" command produces a correc

Re: Instant preview does not work for lyx 2.0.1 for OSX

Sorry, I should have been more precise. Instant preview for included graphics (I have now tested jpg, pdf, eps) does work for me. What does not work is instant preview for equations which are typeset in LyX. I am using OSX 10.7.1 Regards, Marcus

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

10. Now, I have both LyX2.0.0 and LyX2.0.1 installed on my pc ? Shouldn't we overwrite the previous version ? No. See the reasons above. I totally do not agree with these reasons. Because a few people might want to use multiple minor releases, ALL users have to man

Re: Instant preview does not work for lyx 2.0.1 for OSX

On 2011-09-06 19.35, Marcus Kriele wrote: Instant preview does not seem to work with the 2.0.1 cocoa binary for Mac OSX. I have re-downloaded the last 2.0.0 version of the binary and instant preview works flawlessly with this older version. Therefore my problem does not seem to be caused by m

Instant preview does not work for lyx 2.0.1 for OSX

Instant preview does not seem to work with the 2.0.1 cocoa binary for Mac OSX. I have re-downloaded the last 2.0.0 version of the binary and instant preview works flawlessly with this older version. Therefore my problem does not seem to be caused by my lyx settings, unless I missed a change o

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Le 06/09/11 17:57, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Yes, I believe JMarc. The only problem is that it feels like shooting with a canon on a little mouse. OTOH, this availability code itself shoots with a canon on a little mouse. JMarc

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 6-9-2011 15:11, Stephan Witt schreef: Am 06.09.2011 um 13:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: When I was still young and naive about this problem, I suspected a cache problem. Therefore I tried to disable completely the cache but the situation did not change... I really think the problem

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 um 13:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > > When I was still young and naive about this problem, I suspected a cache > problem. Therefore I tried to disable completely the cache but the situation > did not change... > > I really think the problem is related to opening too ma

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

> > > > When I was still young and naive about this problem, I suspected a cache > problem. Therefore I tried to disable completely the cache but the situation > did not change... > > I really think the problem is related to opening too many translation files > with gettext. But I would be delighte

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Le 06/09/11 12:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Now, this causes the translation of languageTestString() to be cached. If we try to load all languages to see whether they are available, the cached value is thus pretty much random. When we call i18nLibFileSearch, we again try to translate lan

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 6-9-2011 11:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 03/09/11 21:25, Stephan Witt a écrit : I had a go at it some time go, and it looks like the code that looks for existing translations (int Language initialization) loads all the .gmo files and after some point gettext refuses to load a new on

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Le 03/09/11 21:25, Stephan Witt a écrit : I had a go at it some time go, and it looks like the code that looks for existing translations (int Language initialization) loads all the .gmo files and after some point gettext refuses to load a new one. You can check whether removing the test for av

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 05.09.2011 19:54, schrieb Pavel Sanda: >> Uwe Stöhr wrote: >>> Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). I'll leave the >>> installer for LyX 2.0.1 to Joost because the merged installer is not yet >>> able to in

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

ure. IMO it is useless. Why would one not want to have LyX in a directory called... "LyX" ? Maybe people requested this because they don't like the default LyX 2.0.0, LyX 2.0.1 and so forth. > There is also only one programs on my PC (Inkscape) that is not following > th

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> 6. Joost had a reason to not allow to start the application from the >> installer. Isn't this a problem >> now anymore ? > > I don't know what you are referring to. > This has been discussed earlier on the list. Now the last page of the installer

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released

Am 06.09.2011 um 00:32 schrieb Liviu Andronic: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Heck wrote: >> * BUILD/INSTALLATION >> >> - Using pkgconfig to configure hunspell (hunspell 1.3 was not correctly >> recognized). >> >> - Using explicit header and library detection as fallback to configur

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

. Without a folder for each program, I would have 5 entries with the same name "LyX". (Initially in the LyX folder there was also the link to uninstall LyX but Joost were opposed to this, so I dropped it.) 3. The start menu folder is called "LyX 2.0.1". I don't like t

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 05.09.2011 20:01, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: For these people we have the standard installer. The bundle installer is especially designed for new installations and therefore includes MiKTeX and JabRef (is optional). So the standard installer will not bother the user and is as small as

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 05.09.2011 19:54, schrieb Pavel Sanda: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). I'll leave the installer for LyX 2.0.1 to Joost because the merged installer is not yet able to install LyX if you install it without admin privileges (due to a Imagemagick

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > * BUILD/INSTALLATION > > - Using pkgconfig to configure hunspell (hunspell 1.3 was not correctly >  recognized). > > - Using explicit header and library detection as fallback to configure >  hunspell in case pkgconfig is missing in build enviro

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

ller. Here is some feedback: 1. The icon is not the nicest one. We should have a transparent one. 2. I agree with Joost that the dialog to choose the start menu folder is not necessary anymore. It is not useful having only a single item in a map. 3. The start menu folder is called "LyX

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released

On 09/05/2011 02:27 PM, José Matos wrote: > On 09/05/2011 06:54 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Congratulations, Richard! > +1 the first time is always the most terrifying. ;-) > I'm hoping that is true. Richard

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released

On 09/05/2011 06:54 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Congratulations, Richard! +1 the first time is always the most terrifying. ;-) -- José Matos

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

In th merged installer MiKTeX is directly included. So even if you don't have Internet access, you can install LyX and it will work with its basic features. There were some reasonable user requests in the past to include MiKTeX directly and the MiKTeX maintainer kindly built in some features

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Released

Richard Heck wrote: > Public release of LyX version 2.0.1 > === > > We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.1. This is the first > maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. Congratulations, Richard! Jürgen

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). I'll leave the > installer for LyX 2.0.1 to Joost because the merged installer is not yet > able to install LyX if you install it without admin privileges (due to a > Imagemagick issue). is this reg

LyX 2.0.1 Released

Public release of LyX version 2.0.1 === We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.1. This is the first maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. LyX 2.0.1 is the result of on-going efforts to make our stable version even more reliable and stable. We have

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 02.09.2011 15:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Can you send me a link to this installer. I want to test it. https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&release_id=18767 regards Uwe

Re: Language changes within index entries - French doc files uncompilable in LyX 2.0.1

he problematic cases right now? Richard, what about LyX 2.0.1? Is it delayed, so that I can put this in? regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 02.09.2011 08:41, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: In th merged installer MiKTeX is directly included. So even if you don't have Internet access, you can install LyX and it will work with its basic features. There were some reasonable user requests in the past to include MiKTeX directly and th

Language changes within index entries (was: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available)

Le 01/09/2011 16:15, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 01.09.2011 10:55, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien: Compilation of French versions of UserGuide and EmbeddedObjects fail for a similar reason: bad language change location in a sectioning heading. Where? For me all documentation files for all languages

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

I've been fiddling around endlessly to get the Application menu translated.. without succces.. Unfortunately LyX has the same problem. Yes, currently I have no idea how to get it translated. A Qt thing? I figured out some things: First, LyX uses QLibraryInfo::location(QLibraryInfo::Translati

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

her > removing the test for availability in Language loading fixes your problem When I remove the test it works. :( I get the following output: % /Users/Shared/LyX/lyx-build/LyX-2.0.1.build/src/lyx -dbg locale Festlegen des Test-Levels auf locale Testen von `locale' (Spracheinstellungen/Int

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Perhaps a look at git log for filetools.cpp would turn something up I'm afraid it's a complex interaction of gettext and the use of the Messages class. The translation of the string languageTestString() is cached, so maybe we ask for the translation of this string before gettext is ini

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Le 03/09/11 18:30, Stephan Witt a écrit : This is the problem. The LANG variable is set to "de_DE.UTF-8". Therefor the UI is german. But the docs are in english because of the "i18nLibFileSearch: lang = en" above. LyX 1.6 prints "i18nLibFileSearch: lang = de" in the same environment. I've check

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

eSearch. >> I've armed it with debug - both for 1.6.10 and 2.0.1 - like below: >> >> --- lyx-2.0.1/src/support/filetools.cpp 2011-08-28 20:44:53.0 >> +0200 >> +++ lyx-2.0.1-locale/src/support/filetools.cpp 2011-09-03 >> 13:16:00.0 +

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

aware that the documentation is not localized for LyX ? Was there a >> reason for or did you not came to it yet ? > The relevant code to choose the correct online help file is in > i18nLibFileSearch. > I've armed it with debug - both for 1.6.10 and 2.0.1 - like below: > > -

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

e a > reason for or did you not came to it yet ? The relevant code to choose the correct online help file is in i18nLibFileSearch. I've armed it with debug - both for 1.6.10 and 2.0.1 - like below: --- lyx-2.0.1/src/support/filetools.cpp 2011-08-28 20:44:53.0 +0200 +++

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 1-9-2011 16:19, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 31.08.2011 20:23, schrieb Richard Heck: I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). Can you send me a link to this installer. I want to test it. Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

t; -) type C-m (math mode), then x, then left-cursor (try once, twice, thrice >> left cursor) >> -) type C-q (quit) >> >> and we get SEGFAULT! > This exact procedure doesn't crash on Mac (lyx-2.0.1 release candidate build). > I didn't see it here either, at least not without instant preview. rh

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 09/01/2011 09:09 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Il 31/08/2011 20:23, Richard Heck ha scritto: >> I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: >> http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz > I only got this warning while compiling: > > Server.cpp: In member funct

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

t; left cursor) > -) type C-q (quit) > > and we get SEGFAULT! This exact procedure doesn't crash on Mac (lyx-2.0.1 release candidate build). Stephan

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 01.09.2011 16:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > > Was this bug fixed? >>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/**ticket/7737 >>> >> > I don't know what this is about. guess that Joost is downloading MiKTeX > fro

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

w on and off, but AFAICR there was a similar bug related to instant preview that was supposed to have been fixed (find below details including the ones about my system). (gdb) run Starting program: /home/tommaso/lyx-trunk-ws/lyx-2.0.1/src/lyx [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [Ne

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Il 31/08/2011 20:23, Richard Heck ha scritto: I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz I only got this warning while compiling: Server.cpp: In member function ‘bool lyx::LyXComm::loadFilesInOtherInstance()’: Server.cpp:1018:45: warning

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 01.09.2011 16:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Was this bug fixed? http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7737 I don't know what this is about. guess that Joost is downloading MiKTeX fro somewhere. I'll have a look. In th merged installer MiKTeX is directly included. So even if you don't hav

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 1-9-2011 16:40, Julien Rioux schreef: On 01/09/2011 4:19 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: From my point of view it is already stable enough since I tested it a lot on different Windows and computers. In case that Joost cannot provide an installer soo Was this bug fixed? http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 01/09/2011 4:19 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: From my point of view it is already stable enough since I tested it a lot on different Windows and computers. In case that Joost cannot provide an installer soo Was this bug fixed? http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7737 -- Julien

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 31.08.2011 20:23, schrieb Richard Heck: I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). I'll leave the installer for LyX 2.0.1 to Joost because the merged installer is not yet able to install LyX if you install it without

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 09/01/2011 07:43 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Stephan Witt wrote: >>> for testing. Please let me know if you have any trouble building it. >>> Assuming there are no problems, I will officially release in the >>> morning, Thursday, my time. >> I have no problem on Mac OS X. The build went fine. > bui

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 01.09.2011 10:55, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien: Compilation of French versions of UserGuide and EmbeddedObjects fail for a similar reason: bad language change location in a sectioning heading. Where? For me all documentation files for all languages compile. regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Richard Heck wrote: > Also, a question. What do people think about releasing patch files? Does > anyone use them? They are not that difficult to create, I would suppose, > but they do take time. I don't know if anybody really uses it, but I always used them to check the changes in advance of a re

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Stephan Witt wrote: > > for testing. Please let me know if you have any trouble building it. > > Assuming there are no problems, I will officially release in the > > morning, Thursday, my time. > > I have no problem on Mac OS X. The build went fine. build went fine on x86 linux, everything seems

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Richard Heck comcast.net> writes: > http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz > http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz.sighttp://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz.sig > for testing. Please let me know if you have any trouble building it. Builds flawlessly here (De

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 31.08.2011 um 20:23 schrieb Richard Heck: > > I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: >http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz >http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz.sig >http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz >http://frege.brown

LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz.sig http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz.sig for testing. Please let me know if you have any

LyX 2.0.1, Again

OK, we made it safely through the storm and all is well here. Enrico has made a few last commits, so I will be planning to freeze branch and prepare the release shortly, meaning later this afternoon or early on Wednesday, as preparation for the new school year permits. If I've approved anything th

Re: LyX 2.0.1

On 08/27/2011 05:06 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > >>> According to john I caused the crashes while fixing the scrolling. >>> That's why I did not backport the fix. >>> >> I'd propose the attached fix, which doesn't trigger any (either >> sporadic and endless) recursive repaint anymore on my U

Re: LyX 2.0.1

On 08/27/2011 09:03 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Il 27/08/2011 14:54, Pavel Sanda ha scritto: >> Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > John.. does this also fix your automatic testcases ? It fixed the recursive paint. I haven't really made regression tests. >>> So it's in: r39535. >> nice

Re: LyX 2.0.1

Il 27/08/2011 14:54, Pavel Sanda ha scritto: Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: John.. does this also fix your automatic testcases ? It fixed the recursive paint. I haven't really made regression tests. So it's in: r39535. nice, this also fixes the regression #7503. nice to know. What about branch ?

Re: LyX 2.0.1

Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: >>> John.. does this also fix your automatic testcases ? >> It fixed the recursive paint. >> >> I haven't really made regression tests. > > So it's in: r39535. nice, this also fixes the regression #7503. pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.1

Il 27/08/2011 11:26, John McCabe-Dansted ha scritto: On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: According to john I caused the crashes while fixing the scrolling. That's why I did not backport the fix. I'd propose the attached fix, which doesn't trigger any (either sporadi

Re: LyX 2.0.1

On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > >>> According to john I caused the crashes while fixing the scrolling. That's >>> why I did not backport the fix. >>> >> I'd propose the attached fix, which doesn't trigger any (either sporadic >> and endless) recursive repaint anymo

Re: LyX 2.0.1

According to john I caused the crashes while fixing the scrolling. That's why I did not backport the fix. I'd propose the attached fix, which doesn't trigger any (either sporadic and endless) recursive repaint anymore on my Ubuntu 11.04 + qt (4:4.7.2-0ubuntu6.2). If it's ok, then it would ap

Re: LyX 2.0.1

Il 25/08/2011 22:12, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto: According to john I caused the crashes while fixing the scrolling. That's why I did not backport the fix. However, I'm convinced that the underlying problem is already in branch. I'd propose the attached fix, which doesn't trigger any

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Monday...Hopefully

On 08/25/2011 09:12 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > you are playing with fire :) > p With a hurricane coming I would expect that to be safe. ;-) -- José Matos

Re: LyX 2.0.1

00:00, Richard Heck ha scritto: >> It appears that the long slumber of ftp.lyx.org is about to come to an >> end, which means that LyX 2.0.1 can be released. I expect to do the >> release work late Thursday or early Friday, depending upon the response >> to this message. So: If t

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Monday...Hopefully

Richard Heck wrote: > It seems there may be a few fixedintrunk bugs it would be good to have > in, though, anyway you are playing with fire :) p

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Monday...Hopefully

On 08/25/2011 04:04 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: >> As we are expecting a hurricane here in New England on Sunday, it seems >> a good idea to push 2.0.1 back a few days. I don't want to release and >> then be without power or internet, which well could happen. Hopefully, >> it will

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Monday...Hopefully

Richard Heck wrote: > As we are expecting a hurricane here in New England on Sunday, it seems > a good idea to push 2.0.1 back a few days. I don't want to release and > then be without power or internet, which well could happen. Hopefully, > it will not be too bad, and I can prepare the release on

Re: LyX 2.0.1

On 08/25/2011 03:42 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Il 25/08/2011 00:00, Richard Heck ha scritto: >> It appears that the long slumber of ftp.lyx.org is about to come to an >> end, which means that LyX 2.0.1 can be released. I expect to do the >> release work late Thursday or ea

Re: LyX 2.0.1

Il 25/08/2011 00:00, Richard Heck ha scritto: It appears that the long slumber of ftp.lyx.org is about to come to an end, which means that LyX 2.0.1 can be released. I expect to do the release work late Thursday or early Friday, depending upon the response to this message. So: If there is

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Monday...Hopefully

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > > As we are expecting a hurricane here in New England on Sunday, it seems > Good luck with that! The release can certainly await. Liviu > a good idea to push 2.0.1 back a few days. I don't want to release and > then be without power or inter

LyX 2.0.1 Monday...Hopefully

As we are expecting a hurricane here in New England on Sunday, it seems a good idea to push 2.0.1 back a few days. I don't want to release and then be without power or internet, which well could happen. Hopefully, it will not be too bad, and I can prepare the release on Monday. But we are not real

LyX 2.0.1

It appears that the long slumber of ftp.lyx.org is about to come to an end, which means that LyX 2.0.1 can be released. I expect to do the release work late Thursday or early Friday, depending upon the response to this message. So: If there is anything anyone would still like to get into 2.0.1

Re: SV: LyX 2.0.1 Duplicate context menu entry "Dissolve Inset" forphantoms

Am Sonntag, 24. Juli 2011 schrieb Helge Hafting: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > >Helge Hafting wrote: > >> Right-click a phantom. Notice that "Dissolve Inset" appear twice on the > >> context menu. This also leads to annoying messages in the terminal, > >> because the menu entry shortcut conflicts with the

SV: LyX 2.0.1 Duplicate context menu entry "Dissolve Inset" forphantoms

Pavel Sanda wrote: >Helge Hafting wrote: >> >> Right-click a phantom. Notice that "Dissolve Inset" appear twice on the >> context menu. >> This also leads to annoying messages in the terminal, because the menu entry >> shortcut conflicts with the shortcut for the other identical entry. > >i thoug

Re: [Patch] Big translation update, nb.po for lyx 2.0.1

Helge Hafting wrote: > I found time, and have updated the norwegian translation nb.po: > * Now 5107 translated strings > * Various fixes > * Updated copyright notice to 2011 > thanks, its in. pavel

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Duplicate context menu entry "Dissolve Inset" for phantoms

Helge Hafting wrote: > > Right-click a phantom. Notice that "Dissolve Inset" appear twice on the > context menu. > This also leads to annoying messages in the terminal, because the menu entry > shortcut conflicts with the shortcut for the other identical entry. i thought Kornel kicked it out.p

LyX 2.0.1 Duplicate context menu entry "Dissolve Inset" for phantoms

Right-click a phantom. Notice that "Dissolve Inset" appear twice on the context menu. This also leads to annoying messages in the terminal, because the menu entry shortcut conflicts with the shortcut for the other identical entry. Helge Hafting

Lyx 2.0.1: Inconsistent table menus

There are two sets of table menus. A context menu you get by right-clicking the table, and a dynamic menu that appear under the main menu "edit". They have some of the same choices (multicolumn, add row, ...) but different shortcuts. Having the same shortcuts in both places would be better: * l

  1   2   >