On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Actually, John, I'd redo FormSplash as a stand alone class, not derived from
> > FormBase at all. You redefine or don't use pretty well all the virtual
> > methods(). It's all a bit confusing; imagine what it
shlyx.tgz
I've made all necessary additions to support Serbo-Croatian in LyX.
* extension of encodings with iso8859-5 and cp-1251
* extension of languages with serbocroatian and serbian.
Serbo-Croatian is a generic name of the language (locale is sh) and
its dialects are Croatian and Serbia
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
[...]
> > > We can also use this file for storing the paper options for xdvi and
> dvipdfm,
> > > which are currently hard-coded in converters.C.
> >
> > I didn't got a response for this mail.
> > Does anyone think this is a bad/good idea ?
>
> This is a g
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Dear all,
|
| The MVC branch is ready to merge back into HEAD. I'll leave things as they
| are for the weekend and then create the patch on Monday.
Ok, before we do the merge:
- get people to try out your patch/branch
- get people to
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I needed to #include in BufferView_pimpl.C
| in order for LC_TIME to be defined
and would not do?
Lgb
After the latest patches LyX wouldn't compile, the following tiny patch
fixes this.
--
Baruch Even
http://baruch.ev-en.org/
Index: src/frontends/xforms/FormPreferences.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends
Dear all,
The MVC branch is ready to merge back into HEAD. I'll leave things as they
are for the weekend and then create the patch on Monday.
For those interested:
frontends/controllers is a new directory that will eventually contain classes
controlling the interaction of all dialogs to and fr
Attached the character patch v2. With some cleaning following Angus' and
John's suggestions.
Thank you, gr.ed.
character2.diff.gz
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 23-Feb-2001 John Levon wrote:
| >
| > How ? What's the code path that reaches MenuSendto() ?
| > Where is LFUN_MENUSENDTO handled ?
|
| Ohh I see what you mean! Someone disabled this! I really want
| this enabled and will do so as soon as I've some
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:15:23 -0500
From: Roy Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Broken link in www.devel.lyx.org
There appears to be a problem on this page of your site.
On your page http://www.devel.
On Friday 23 February 2001 13:33, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 12:17:41PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > I think that we should remove the printer flags fields from lyxrc and the
> > preferences dialog. Instead we will have a file called lib/programflags
> > that will have the flag in
Edwin, this is beautifully done. Two small points:
In src/lyxfunc.C
case LFUN_FREE:
- Free(owner->view());
- owner->view()->setState();
- owner->showState();
+ owner->view()->owner()->getDialogs()->setUserFreeFont();
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 12:17:41PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I think that we should remove the printer flags fields from lyxrc and the
> preferences dialog. Instead we will have a file called lib/programflags
> that will have the flag information for various commands (dvips, dvilj4):
>
> Program
Hi!
I would like to point your attention to some peculiarities in the 1.1.6fix1 version of
LyX.
I'm using LyX 1.1.6fix1 on a Linux 2.2.17 system, I have compiled LyX from sources,
using egcs-2.91.66
When inserting text in the table, when using numerical keyboard, the nubers get
inserted in f
I needed to #include in BufferView_pimpl.C
in order for LC_TIME to be defined
thanks
john
--
"Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack away on
a complicated piece of code and avoid total anarchy has never managed a
software project."
- Andy Tanenbaum
Hello,
I've had some a small problem building lyx with the newest libspell
version:
/home/zeitlin/include/pspell/manager.h: In function `struct isp_result *
sc_check_word(const class string &)':
/home/zeitlin/include/pspell/manager.h:59: too few arguments to function
`int pspell_manager_check(
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Continuing on:
>
> This is not acceptable. Patches to .fd files only accepted as a last resort.
> This doesn't qualify.
>
> Angus
ok, whatever
john
--
"Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack away on
a complicated piec
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:32:32PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > > > I thought we dodn't do C-style casts?
> > >
> > > You want me to do a typedef instead ? or is the scope resolution
> > > operator allowed in C++ style casts ?
> >
> > Change the line above to
> > Formats::FormatList::size_type
Continuing on:
This is not acceptable. Patches to .fd files only accepted as a last resort.
This doesn't qualify.
Angus
Index: src/frontends/xforms/forms/form_filedialog.C.patch
===
RCS file: form_filedialog.C.patch
diff -N form_
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >From the xforms manuals (they really are very good):
I didn't have it around at the time of patch, my bad
> It returns the number of the current choice (0 if there is no choice).
*sigh* then why didn't they make it unsigned
anyway, Dekel's change i
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 05:06:13PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 23-Feb-2001 John Levon wrote:
> >
> > How ? What's the code path that reaches MenuSendto() ?
> > Where is LFUN_MENUSENDTO handled ?
>
> Ohh I see what you mean! Someone disabled this! I really want
> this enabled and will do
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| You're trying to delete the same object twice.
|
| void FormSplash::build()
| {
| dialog_ = build_splash();
| }
|
|
| FD_form_splash * FormSplash::build_splash()
| {
| FD_form_splash *fdui = new FD_form_splash;
| fdui->form->u_vdata = this;
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 23-Feb-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > I'd say yes... I'll let others decide that one.
| > (I have never used it...)
|
| Definitively NO! Why should we remove this functionallity?
| I use it for example to print series of letters out of LyX!
On Friday 23 February 2001 16:32, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:19:03PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > > > Index: src/frontends/xforms/FormPreferences.C
> > > >
> > > > + if (i < 0 || (((::Formats::FormatList::size_type)i) <=
> >
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:19:03PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > > Index: src/frontends/xforms/FormPreferences.C
> > >
> > > + if (i < 0 || (((::Formats::FormatList::size_type)i) <=
> > > local_formats.size())) {
> > >
> > > I thought we dodn't do C-styl
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Fixed!
> Fixed!
> Fixed!
damnit you're fast !
> Why shouldn't it! It works (but only inside the tabular, so for now it
> page/scrolls the tabular up'n'down.
>
> Jürgen
I'm just thinking of the poor user who starts off in a tabular and trys to
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:19:03PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > Index: src/frontends/xforms/FormPreferences.C
> >
> > + if (i < 0 || (((::Formats::FormatList::size_type)i) <=
> > local_formats.size())) {
> >
> > I thought we dodn't do C-style casts?
>
> You want me to do a typedef instead ?
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > And I still don't understand _why_ this is needed.
|
| You will!
I didn't...
| Diff attached (I was about to commit you just beat me for about 5 minutes
| with your mail ;)
It was better than expected, so go ahead.
Lgb
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 23-Feb-2001 John Levon wrote:
| >
| > Attached is very minor cleanups for mathed and support.
| >
|
| This seems also good to me!
mmm...yes
Lgb
On 22-Feb-2001 Michael Schmitt wrote:
> You are right. I corrected myself meanwhile. The problem is that you
> cannot select a single cell! I think this is not intended, is it?
>
I'll still have to look at this one!
> Partially confirmed. It works fine inside the red boxes. Using the
> keys o
On 23-Feb-2001 John Levon wrote:
> Indeed, fixed, but there are less important problems related :
>
> 1) the cursor will leave white hole in the blue selection
Fixed!
> 2) switching out of an insettext leaves the stuff selected when selecting
>elsewhere
Fixed!
> 3) selecting some text,
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This is NOT a get-at-John day (by the way).
awww, that sounds like fun.
>
> The FileDialog stuff will take some digesting. It's huge!
but actually very simple in concept. Literally filedlg.C just got moved.
I suppose I should have left the KDE v
Hi,
Could someone review the applied patch. It moves the layout character stuff
to frontends/xforms. It seems to be functional and compiles, but it is not
impossible that I missed something or should do things differently.
Thanks, Ed.
character1.diff.gz
This is NOT a get-at-John day (by the way).
The FileDialog stuff will take some digesting. It's huge!
As for the rest:
Index: src/frontends/xforms/FormGraphics.C
- string const pattern = "*(ps|png)";
+ // FIXME: currently we need the second '|' to prevent mis-interpretation
+
So I gave you time enough!
I'll have to go now and I will commit this before!
If there is some big problem with the code we can revert it later
(but I really think there is no problem with it I just moved the
code and adapted it without changing it AND I did test it)
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-.
On 23-Feb-2001 John Levon wrote:
>
> How ? What's the code path that reaches MenuSendto() ?
> Where is LFUN_MENUSENDTO handled ?
Ohh I see what you mean! Someone disabled this! I really want
this enabled and will do so as soon as I've some time!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> You're trying to delete the same object twice.
>
> Capisco?
> A
*d'oh*
sorry, sorry, slow on the take today
john
--
"Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack away on
a complicated piece of code and avoid total anarchy ha
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:55, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > > What a weird way to ask a question !
> >
> > My apologies.
>
> no problem, I would smiley but I know what day it is.
>
> > > Doesn't the "pre" delete the FormSplash object itself rather than
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Actually, John, I'd redo FormSplash as a stand alone class, not derived from
> FormBase at all. You redefine or don't use pretty well all the virtual
> methods(). It's all a bit confusing; imagine what it'll be like in 6 month's
> time!
>
> Angus
M
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 23-Feb-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > I'd say yes... I'll let others decide that one.
> > (I have never used it...)
>
> Definitively NO! Why should we remove this functionallity?
> I use it for example to print series of letters out of Ly
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:53, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Application form being processed by the Lunatic Asylum as we speak.
>
> ha !
>
> > Anyway, futher comment to FormSplash. You derive it from FormBaseBI which
> > already has a Connection h_.
>
On 23-Feb-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'd say yes... I'll let others decide that one.
> (I have never used it...)
Definitively NO! Why should we remove this functionallity?
I use it for example to print series of letters out of LyX!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > What a weird way to ask a question !
>
> My apologies.
no problem, I would smiley but I know what day it is.
> > Doesn't the "pre" delete the FormSplash object itself rather than the
> dialog_.
> > It's the equivalent of "delete this" if the Close
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Application form being processed by the Lunatic Asylum as we speak.
ha !
> Anyway, futher comment to FormSplash. You derive it from FormBaseBI which
> already has a Connection h_.
>
> void FormBaseBI::connect()
> {
> h_ = d_->hideAll.connect(
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:39, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > void FormSplash::CloseCB(FL_OBJECT * ob)
> > {
> > FormSplash * pre = static_cast(ob->form->u_vdata);
> > pre->hide();
> > delete pre->dialog_;
> > pre->dialog_ = 0;
> > + // wh
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:37, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Well currently I consider you to be a b@$@!?d because of all those ^M
> > carriage returns
> > pre->dialog_ = 0;
> > + // why this?
> > delete pre;
> > }
> >
>
> Unless I'm going mad
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This cleans up a couple of things mentioned 2 weeks ago.
This is ok.
| p.s. can we remove LyXSendTo.C ???
I'd say yes... I'll let others decide that one.
(I have never used it...)
Lgb
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 23-Feb-2001 John Levon wrote:
| >
| > This cleans up a couple of things mentioned 2 weeks ago.
|
| This seems good to me, Lars what do you say?
Just give me time to have a look.
Lgb
On 23 Feb 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | As you know we also are pretty specialized f.ex. Jean-Marc does the configure
> | stuff normally. So If I see a part which is in my campus I'm fast to review
> | it, but if most of the patch is outside a
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> void FormSplash::CloseCB(FL_OBJECT * ob)
> {
> FormSplash * pre = static_cast(ob->form->u_vdata);
> pre->hide();
> delete pre->dialog_;
> pre->dialog_ = 0;
> + // why this?
> delete pre;
> }
>
> This is just a pointer
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| As you know we also are pretty specialized f.ex. Jean-Marc does the configure
| stuff normally. So If I see a part which is in my campus I'm fast to review
| it, but if most of the patch is outside and I don't know how to split it
| up I probably will g
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Well currently I consider you to be a b@$@!?d because of all those ^M
> carriage returns
> pre->dialog_ = 0;
> + // why this?
> delete pre;
> }
>
Unless I'm going mad, my patch doesn't have either of these features. I'm really
confuse
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:22, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > On Friday 23 February 2001 15:07, John Levon wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > This should help the iconify situation in xforms.
> > > It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash,
> > > and remo
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 23 February 2001 15:07, John Levon wrote:
>
> > >
> > This should help the iconify situation in xforms.
> > It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash,
> > and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C
> >
> > john
>
> The Fo
On 23-Feb-2001 John Levon wrote:
>
> Attached is very minor cleanups for mathed and support.
>
This seems also good to me!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fa
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:07, John Levon wrote:
> >
> This should help the iconify situation in xforms.
> It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash,
> and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C
>
> john
The FormSplash patch has gone both into this file and into the FileDi
Attached is very minor cleanups for mathed and support.
john
--
On Year 2000 compliance :
"Unfortunately, it is not possible to gather similar
assurances on the compliance of viruses."
- Dr. Solomon's RIP
diff -u -p -r1.40 ChangeLog
--- src/mathed/ChangeLog2001/02/20 17:45:
This should help the iconify situation in xforms.
It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash,
and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C
john
--
On Year 2000 compliance :
"Unfortunately, it is not possible to gather similar
assurances on the compliance of viruses."
-
>
> Please don't.
>
Well this has to be done!
> If you do this anyway... please post the complete diff _before_
> committing _anything_ to the repository.
I can make you happy about this, but look at it now, as I want to commit
this. Also pay head that we NEED this!
> I am _really_ nervous a
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, John Levon wrote:
>
> I've split this apart as best I can (luckily I found a
> diff I did of FormExternal against this, so I could
> back it off with minimum of fuss)
>
> john
ugh, sorry, malformed patch. try the new attached instead
thanks
john
--
On Year 2000 complianc
I've split this apart as best I can (luckily I found a
diff I did of FormExternal against this, so I could
back it off with minimum of fuss)
john
--
On Year 2000 compliance :
"Unfortunately, it is not possible to gather similar
assurances on the compliance of viruses."
- Dr. Solomon's
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 22-Feb-2001 Juergen Vigna wrote:
|
| > To fix this I would need to split all LyXFunc up in LyXFunc which need
| > LyXText and other LyXFuncs. Would it be doable to have a dispatch
| > routine inside LyXText for all functions needing a LyXText?
|
|
On 23-Feb-2001 John Levon wrote:
>
> This cleans up a couple of things mentioned 2 weeks ago.
This seems good to me, Lars what do you say?
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/
On 23-Feb-2001 Paolo Gai wrote:
Thanks IMO I already fixed this in cvs but anyway if it helps
here is the patch for 1.1.6 (which I also checked in into the 1_1_6 cvs.
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/tabular.C,v
r
This cleans up a couple of things mentioned 2 weeks ago.
john
p.s. can we remove LyXSendTo.C ???
--
On Year 2000 compliance :
"Unfortunately, it is not possible to gather similar
assurances on the compliance of viruses."
- Dr. Solomon's RIP
Index: src/ChangeLog
===
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > One option is to replace the most suspicious changes with the
| > "original" ones instead of reverting the whole thing.
|
| Unless you found the bug already I'd ask you to revert the "whole thing" now.
| I'd rather stay a bit longer at work today tha
This bit fixes the various things I mentioned to JMarc today
john
--
On Year 2000 compliance :
"Unfortunately, it is not possible to gather similar
assurances on the compliance of viruses."
- Dr. Solomon's RIP
Index: ChangeLog
===
On 23-Feb-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> Alternatively, Lars will end up having to look at everything!
Good old Lars ;)
Well I had a (REALLY) fast look at the patch and now I'm more then before
of the same opinion as Angus. There are too much different changes in that
file, to chop with and I fea
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> For the same reason. It's too much for mere mortals to cope with!
OK, I'll split it now. Thanks.
> Well different people know different bits of the code to different levels.
> For example, I feel able to comment on the FileDialog stuff which looks li
On Friday 23 February 2001 13:58, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Come on, John! This is huge and monstrous! Can't you split it up into
> > logically independent patches:
> >
> > * configure stuff
> > * File dialog
> > * External dialog
> > * DO_USE_DEFAULT_L
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 23-Feb-2001 John Levon wrote:
>
> > It was half the size last week when it got ignored. I *could* just split it up
> > but I don't see how that helps, it just makes 10 or so ChangeLog .rej files
> > the applier has to clean up.
> >
> > It all ha
On 23-Feb-2001 John Levon wrote:
> It was half the size last week when it got ignored. I *could* just split it up
> but I don't see how that helps, it just makes 10 or so ChangeLog .rej files
> the applier has to clean up.
>
> It all has to be reviewed by *someone*. How does splitting it up mak
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Come on, John! This is huge and monstrous! Can't you split it up into
> logically independent patches:
>
> * configure stuff
> * File dialog
> * External dialog
> * DO_USE_DEFAULT_LANGUAGE
> * etc etc
>
> You might get some feedback then!
>
> Angus
Come on, John! This is huge and monstrous! Can't you split it up into
logically independent patches:
* configure stuff
* File dialog
* External dialog
* DO_USE_DEFAULT_LANGUAGE
* etc etc
You might get some feedback then!
Angus
On Friday 23 February 2001 12:46, John Levon wrote:
> The not-a
Hello!
Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> I tried to compile LyX 1.1.6. on a RS/6000 (AIX 4.3.3) using gcc 2.95.2.
> Everything worked fine until the linking (not a GNU ld) began. Then I had a TOC
>overflow for the directory /src.
> So I tried to modify the scr/Makefile with LDFLAGS=-bbigtoc.
> Then it
On Friday 23 February 2001 12:19, you wrote:
> On 22 Feb 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > | I re-tried purify, but it seems it does not work here anymore. I
> > | though I'd find a way to get a list of allocated blocks...
> > |
> > | Assumin
The not-attached patch fixes all sorts of stuff, and GUIIizes
the External form and FileDialog.
One thing of interest is a "fix" for the FL_TRANSIENT stuff.
This *should* ensure that iconified dialogs are brought
back up again - at least it seems a convention that
XMapWindow() has this effect. A
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > - When selecting text by doube-clicking the left mouse button,
> > the cell content is displayed in the top left corner of the main
> > lyx window!
>
> Fixed! (I cannot remember where this came from)
Indeed, fixed, but there are less impor
On 22 Feb 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> - the install when compiling from source won't work properly for
> John> many people
>
> John> or maybe I am hassling you too much now
>
> What is this problem exactly?
>
> JMarc
Th
On 22 Feb 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I re-tried purify, but it seems it does not work here anymore. I
> | though I'd find a way to get a list of allocated blocks...
> |
> | Assuming this comes from LyXText, what are the places where
On 22-Feb-2001 Juergen Vigna wrote:
> To fix this I would need to split all LyXFunc up in LyXFunc which need
> LyXText and other LyXFuncs. Would it be doable to have a dispatch
> routine inside LyXText for all functions needing a LyXText?
Well for now I will split the switch in LyXFunc::Dispatc
Hi!
I'm writing this mail to inform you that I think I have discovered a bug
in LyX 1.1.6fix1.
I installed the RPM found on Sylvan's FTP site.
try these things:
- download the file http://erika.sssup.it/perf.lyx.gz (only 1700 bytes)
- open it
- in the first table, go on the top right corner (t
83 matches
Mail list logo
