request them can be found here:
>
http://lococouncil.ubuntu.com/2014/03/13/14-04-dvdscds-pre-orders-now-open-for-verified-loco-teams/
>
> If you have any questions, make sure to email us at
> loco-coun...@lists.ubuntu.com.
>
> --
> On behalf of the LoCo Council,
> José Antoni
3/14-04-dvdscds-pre-orders-now-open-for-verified-loco-teams/
>
> If you have any questions, make sure to email us at
> loco-coun...@lists.ubuntu.com.
>
> --
> On behalf of the LoCo Council,
> José Antonio Rey
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-contacts@lis
Hello, everyone!
As you read, the pre-orders of DVD/CD Packs for 14.04 are now open. More
information about the topic and how to request them can be found here:
http://lococouncil.ubuntu.com/2014/03/13/14-04-dvdscds-pre-orders-now-open-for-verified-loco-teams/
If you have any questions, make
the beginning of the email subject.
More info about this monthly show can be found at
http://lococouncil.ubuntu.com/2014/02/28/loco-teams-update-on-air/. See
you there!
--
José Antonio Rey
--
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
Hi all,
As everyone in this list probably knows, vUDS is starting this week \o/
LoCo teams are going to be a key topic this time around, and I'd like to
invite
everyone who'd like to contribute to making our LoCos even more awesome to
participate, be it on the live session, on I
ction looks like:
> > http://ubuntu-discourse.org/category/local-teams
> >
> > And here's a currently empty example with Vancouver:
> > http://ubuntu-discourse.org/category/ubuntu-vancouver
> >
> > The idea would be to move interested LoCo teams that are NOT u
ssion-on-discourse/959
>
> So what does this have to do with local teams? As it turns out
> Discourse needs a few things sorted out, mostly, how can it support
> nested categories? How can it scale? Well I've had some talks with the
> upstream project, the Forums Council, and the LoCo
some talks with the
upstream project, the Forums Council, and the LoCo council and we feel
that LoCo teams would be the perfect place to rock this. Here's what
the LoCo section looks like:
http://ubuntu-discourse.org/category/local-teams
And here's a currently empty example with Vancouve
Le 10/09/2013 09:32, Bhavani Shankar R a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Philippe wrote:
Hi everyone,
Where are we going with this thread ?
One thing I try to put in place in my team is when someone start a project
or a discussion, he have to follow it, to run it, to summarize it, a
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Philippe wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Where are we going with this thread ?
>
> One thing I try to put in place in my team is when someone start a project
> or a discussion, he have to follow it, to run it, to summarize it, and to
> find the people to do the actions
Hi everyone,
Where are we going with this thread ?
One thing I try to put in place in my team is when someone start a
project or a discussion, he have to follow it, to run it, to summarize
it, and to find the people to do the actions (the hardest part I think).
Because by experience, when thi
Yes, Ohio's been unapproved for over six months. That's why this is news to me
unless when you reached out was before I took over as Point of Contact/Leader
from the prior Council.
Stephen Michael Kellat
Point of Contact/Leader, Ubuntu Ohio
On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 00:28:30 -0700
Benjamin Kerensa
If Ohio was unapproved then absolutely yes. I emailed every unapproved loco
contact in North America to see why their loco had not been approved or
lapsed approval.
The common theme was similar to what Valorie has shared that being they
were trying to swim against q current.
On Sep 7, 2013 3:07 P
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> Why should they have to only reach out to the LoCo Council? This has not
> worked up till now why would it work in the future? The number of LoCo's is
> not so vast that the LoCo Council could not choose a select amount and do
> quarterly h
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 12:51:35 -0700
Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Pablo Rubianes
> > wrote:
> > > The LoCo Council want to help on this and other cases, but if people
> > don't
> > > contact the LoCo counc
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Pablo Rubianes
> wrote:
> > The LoCo Council want to help on this and other cases, but if people
> don't
> > contact the LoCo council we can't do it as there are a lot of Teams and
> we
> > can't know what
Just to clarify -- I wasn't talking trash about the LoCo Council. Of course
we talked with them, often. Stuff Happens; we all know this. What happened
or didn't happen wasn't their fault. It wasn't even the former leader's
fault, or those who decided that regional groups would be deprecated.
Impro
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Pablo Rubianes
wrote:
> The LoCo Council want to help on this and other cases, but if people don't
> contact the LoCo council we can't do it as there are a lot of Teams and we
> can't know what is happening in everyone of them.
+1 as the number of teams we cater to
gt; should step down considerately, however some people don't do it, and there
> is
> not easy way to force it.
>
> I'd like to see a policy for leaders and contact persons in a way that
> after
> certain time the contact person is rotated. This could help t
people don't do it, and there is
not easy way to force it.
I'd like to see a policy for leaders and contact persons in a way that after
certain time the contact person is rotated. This could help to avoid this
situations and could be a good metric about how internal Loco Teams perfor
It's nice to see some discussion on the list again. Frankly, I thought that
LoCos were just being phased out.
A few years ago, as I got involved in Ubuntu-Women, and then the larger
Ubuntu and Kubuntu communities, I was enthusiastic to get a local group
going, and by wonderful chance, another woma
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
>> Yes, Ubuntu already has it I guess, and Ubuntu Membership is on
>> parallels to a fedora ambassador or Mozilla reps I believe. Please
>> correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> No both are the closest equivalent to LoCo's but where more leadership
>
; > mind.
>
> Yes, Ubuntu already has it I guess, and Ubuntu Membership is on
> parallels to a fedora ambassador or Mozilla reps I believe. Please
> correct me if I'm wrong.
No both are the closest equivalent to LoCo's but where more leadership
occurs at the individual lev
s and see where they have been
> successful. Fedora Ambassadors, Mozilla Reps and other programs come to
> mind.
Yes, Ubuntu already has it I guess, and Ubuntu Membership is on
parallels to a fedora ambassador or Mozilla reps I believe. Please
correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Jono ha
Hi
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Benjamin Kerensa
> wrote:
> > I think what has been lacking in the LoCo Council is thinking outside the
> > box and I think the upcoming elections offer a great opportunity to
> bring in
> > some ch
On Wednesday, 4 September 2013, Jan Friberg wrote:
>
> 2013/9/4 Chris Johnston
>
> On 09/03/2013 04:20 PM, Jan Friberg wrote:
> >
> > I'd love to see some discussion around this. The Ubuntu community has
> > always worked hard to be inclusive of all kinds of contributions,
> > Ubuntu
Le 04/09/2013 05:57, Chris Johnston a écrit :
On 09/03/2013 04:20 PM, Jan Friberg wrote:
I'd love to see some discussion around this. The Ubuntu community has
always worked hard to be inclusive of all kinds of contributions,
Ubuntu Membership is open to everyone: artists, transla
2013/9/4 Chris Johnston
> On 09/03/2013 04:20 PM, Jan Friberg wrote:
> >
> > I'd love to see some discussion around this. The Ubuntu community has
> > always worked hard to be inclusive of all kinds of contributions,
> > Ubuntu Membership is open to everyone: artists, translators, fol
On 09/03/2013 04:20 PM, Jan Friberg wrote:
>
> I'd love to see some discussion around this. The Ubuntu community has
> always worked hard to be inclusive of all kinds of contributions,
> Ubuntu Membership is open to everyone: artists, translators, folks
> running Ubuntu events, eve
> I'd love to see some discussion around this. The Ubuntu community has
> always worked hard to be inclusive of all kinds of contributions,
> Ubuntu Membership is open to everyone: artists, translators, folks
> running Ubuntu events, everyone contributing anything to Ubuntu and
> the community! In
Hi all!
This email has good things to keep in mind! and all ideas are pretty good...
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 2:57 AM, YoBoY wrote:
> Le 31/08/2013 22:17, Pablo Rubianes a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>> As I am part of the LoCo Council I want to say that there's no magic
>> here, no single solutions f
Le 31/08/2013 22:17, Pablo Rubianes a écrit :
Hi all,
As I am part of the LoCo Council I want to say that there's no magic
here, no single solutions for the community problems,
but as Bhavani said we are working to get the best solution for all
cases, because not all the LoCos work the same, beca
Le 31/08/2013 19:54, Javier Lopez a écrit :
If we don't discuss real issues we're not gonna improve our communities =)
Hi,
Well, each time I have raised some issue, I just had the feeling it was
useless.
For example, the last one was the 13.04 DVD artwork. Laura did an
amazing job trying
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Jan Friberg wrote:
> Language is important
> In my mind translation is the most important work that can be done in the
> LoCo:s today. But the translators don't have the same status as the
> developers. Without the translators work people will not use the developers
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Jan Bongaerts wrote:
> For example, we have 3 people trying to work a bit on promoting ubuntu in
> the education sector. Unfortunately we have no idea or experience with this
> subject, and no-one can give us guidance. We have to discover it all on our
> own. Since
Just to add my 2cents , I LOVE the idea of giving the loco team contacts
early info. Thats the whole point of joining any clubs, insider info.
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Jan Friberg wrote:
> Hello everyone
> I rewrote this many times and then I just decided to send it as it is.
>
> I am th
Hello everyone
I rewrote this many times and then I just decided to send it as it is.
I am the Team Contact for Ubuntu Sweden. Let me start with a little history
from Sweden.
We lost our “approval” in November 2010. And it almost killed our LoCo.
>From that day every action made in the team was qu
past real UDS for letting me meet
> > them) on our events I always have to ping them, mail them, call them,
> > and it's time consuming and very frustrating.
> >
> > Now, we don't have enough people to lead, to organise events, to make
> > things work. New member
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 9:25 AM, YoBoY wrote:
> Le 31/08/2013 17:03, Michael Hall a écrit :
>
>> For tablecloths, lanyards and other materials you can apply for funding
>> from the community donations:
>>
>> http://fridge.ubuntu.com/2013/06/20/ubuntu-donations-and-community-funding/
>>
>>
>> Micha
ibutors don't participate on our locoteam, don't register to
> > our mailing lists. To have some of them (thanks to the past real UDS
> > for letting me meet them) on our events I always have to ping them,
> > mail them, call them, and it's time consuming and very
et them) on our events I always have to ping them,
> mail them, call them, and it's time consuming and very frustrating.
>
> Now, we don't have enough people to lead, to organise events, to
> make things work. New members want to participate but don't want
> responsibilities.
e now and an effort to make more LoCo's more
active and trying to support them and push them in every regard.
Some of them include:
Relaxing of the current approval process and rebranding the same, so
loco teams who are verified will continue to be verified until and
unless they fail to turn up
Le 31/08/2013 17:03, Michael Hall a écrit :
For tablecloths, lanyards and other materials you can apply for funding
from the community donations:
http://fridge.ubuntu.com/2013/06/20/ubuntu-donations-and-community-funding/
Michael Hall
mhall...@ubuntu.com
Thank you Michael for this informatio
ime consuming and very frustrating.
>
> Now, we don't have enough people to lead, to organise events, to make
> things work. New members want to participate but don't want
> responsibilities.
>
>
> ## Re-energizing
> You want to re-energize LoCo teams. Thank you
Hi!
So much true for Russian LoCo too...
But from some point of view, there are positive things I can mention:
* Our local forum is not so tech place as it used to be. People are
disscussing more about everything they care of. Community is not limited to
one particular theme anymore.
* Ubuntu a
Hi Philippe ,
I thought it was very well said about the current
state of affair for loco teams. Tres Bien.
Regards
Billy
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 6:53 PM, YoBoY wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm not perhaps the right person to talk about locoteams here beca
on't have enough people to lead, to organise events, to make
things work. New members want to participate but don't want
responsibilities.
## Re-energizing
You want to re-energize LoCo teams. Thank you for that, we clearly need
help and new motivated members.
You can start by
ed
> with the corpses of many great technologies that didn't catch on. The
> key to successful, living, breathing technology is *adoption* and
> *passionate users and developers*.
>
> ## Building Adoption
>
> LoCo Teams are a *critical* piece of how we drive this adopt
n't catch on. The
> key to successful, living, breathing technology is *adoption* and
> *passionate users and developers*.
>
> ## Building Adoption
>
> LoCo Teams are a *critical* piece of how we drive this adoption.
>
> LoCo teams are our front-line troops out there living U
technology is not enough though. Silicon Valley is littered
with the corpses of many great technologies that didn't catch on. The
key to successful, living, breathing technology is *adoption* and
*passionate users and developers*.
## Building Adoption
LoCo Teams are a *critical* piece of how we drive
Automating Team Reports
any news ? it's ok or not ?
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> The Mozilla Reps program also has reports but they are for individuals
> versus teams but the reporting is pretty similar in nature. The
> platform is already developed out and integrat
On 02/11/2013 04:09 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
I realize that we don't do it to have DVD's (I don't know anyone in my
LoCo who still uses disc media to install Ubuntu.) but instead the
DVD's is just another tool to further the effort.
I wonder how many groups do go through the approval / reap
LoCo teams need not be approved to manage a website or register a domain
containing the Ubuntu wordmark.
On Feb 11, 2013 1:32 AM, "Christophe Sauthier (Huats)" <
christophe.sauth...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:50 AM, YoBoY wrote:
> > Le 11/02/20
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> Am I the only person has considered that any special word for a LoCo might
> be counterproductive to the goal of advocating form use of Ubuntu?
>
> Let's consider this... The only changes that occur when a LoCo is approved
> is that the Lo
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:50 AM, YoBoY wrote:
> Le 11/02/2013 09:09, Benjamin Kerensa a écrit :
>
>>
>> IMHO contributing at the local community level should be the least
>> bureaucratic and easiest process in the community.
>>
>
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> And it is the easiest way to contribute for lot o
Hi YoBoy,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:50 AM, YoBoY wrote:
> Le 11/02/2013 09:09, Benjamin Kerensa a écrit :
>
>>
>> IMHO contributing at the local community level should be the least
>> bureaucratic and easiest process in the community.
>>
>
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> And it is the easiest way to contribu
The Mozilla Reps program also has reports but they are for individuals
versus teams but the reporting is pretty similar in nature. The
platform is already developed out and integrates with Moin which
Ubuntu already uses for the Wiki but eliminates the need to actually
use the Wiki since its a form
Le 11/02/2013 09:09, Benjamin Kerensa a écrit :
IMHO contributing at the local community level should be the least
bureaucratic and easiest process in the community.
Hi Benjamin,
And it is the easiest way to contribute for lot of users in my
community. They contribute to the localised resso
t; Big hugs,
>>
>> YoBoY
>>
>
> Hey there,
>
> I was quite surprised seeing this topic being discussed in multiple places :-)
>
> As far as I can say (re-iterating my views on the other list), we
> would rather define sponsored as sponsored from the ubuntu commu
ity of Ubuntu and we consider our selves members
of
> > the community.
> >
>
> Hello Zied,
>
> Agreed that Canonical does provide some resources (such as shipping
> cd's/dvd's via shipit for example) for Approved teams but I believe
> all the decisions are
I agree with the phrase "Sponsored" while at the same time I think YoBoy
has pointed out a seemingly important issue.
Which is sponsorship is nice albeit its not a reward or recognition the
reality is that LoCo's do a lot of hard work marketing Ubuntu to get this
label of recognition just so they
ponsored" has a current majority, perhaps we can reach
> consensus with a bit more information:
>
> What problem are we (or were we) trying to solve by labeling teams in
> the first place? Can anyone provide a crisp problem statement? And, as a
> thought experiment, what would
On 13-02-09 08:29 AM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Neil Oosthuizen wrote:
>> In the sense that the current approved loco's would be known as "recognized"
>> loco's... as in "recognized" by Canonical (or the Ubuntu Community) for
>> sustained contributions as a loco. B
>
> So, Dont you think it would be a bit hard if we say that a loco team
> is unrecognised when a loco team has just started to contribute,
> organising events and spreading ubuntu with a goal of getting approved
> eventually find the word a bit demotivating?
>
> Regards,
>
> Well then here lies th
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Neil Oosthuizen wrote:
> In the sense that the current approved loco's would be known as "recognized"
> loco's... as in "recognized" by Canonical (or the Ubuntu Community) for
> sustained contributions as a loco. But like I said, not to fragment the
> discussion any
being discussed in multiple places :-)
As far as I can say (re-iterating my views on the other list), we
would rather define sponsored as sponsored from the ubuntu community
as the whole approval process is taken care by the LoCo Council on
behalf of the ubuntu community.
So bringing in canonical (
>
>
> Hello Niel,
>
> Firstly, thanks a lot for contributing to the discussion :-)
>
> Considering that LoCo teams for a particular area are a group of
> people who are like minded to spread ubuntu who finally team up
> themselves to get recognized as a team working i
hanks a lot for contributing to the discussion :-)
Considering that LoCo teams for a particular area are a group of
people who are like minded to spread ubuntu who finally team up
themselves to get recognized as a team working in that particular area
to spread awareness on ubuntu, How does the recogni
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Martin Owens wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 18:49 +, Laura Czajkowski wrote:
>> some teams prefer to use their own tools.
>
> A fair point. But I'm thinking more about automation and instant
> feedback. Not council meditation. I'm sure the council would make a
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Laura Czajkowski wrote:
> On 08/02/13 18:06, Martin Owens wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 19:43 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>>> But wont it be too harsh on other loco teams as it gives rise to a
>>> thinking that they are marked as
u!"
> >>
> >> I've been following this thread all along, and this post is the one I
> >> keep thinking of. This accurately describes my feelings too.
> >>
> >> I also would like to note, it hasn't just been Canonical who us
Le 09/02/2013 01:20, Grant Bowman a écrit :
+1 for "Sponsored" which seems to have a majority from my unscientific
view reading along.
Really? Another fork of the topic?
The "sponsored" term just make me smile, and it's so linked with the
commercial part of Canonical. We are not really spons
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 13:26 -0800, Elizabeth Krumbach wrote:
> I would really like to see this too
Feel free to snipper me on specific items. You've got a backlog of
reputation to spend the size of a moon.
Martin,
--
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubunt
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 16:20 -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
> I am with "Ubuntu California"
This is where you have to decide if your an actor on behalf of the
Ubuntu California Local Community, or an individual associated with
other individuals in the Local Community.
In my travels, I hardly ever say
t; keep thinking of. This accurately describes my feelings too.
>>>
>>> I also would like to note, it hasn't just been Canonical who uses
>>> "approval" as a mechanism for giving gifts, Prentice Hall used it as
>>> the criteria for who they w
e I
>> keep thinking of. This accurately describes my feelings too.
>>
>> I also would like to note, it hasn't just been Canonical who uses
>> "approval" as a mechanism for giving gifts, Prentice Hall used it as
>> the criteria for who they would send cop
r who they would send copies of the Official Ubuntu
> Book to:
> http://www.jonobacon.org/2011/07/05/free-official-ubuntu-book-for-approved-loco-teams/
>
> --
> Elizabeth Krumbach // Lyz // pleia2
> http://www.princessleia.com
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-c
On 02/08/2013 04:26 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach wrote:
I would really like to see this too, the current bug to add this
functionality is here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/loco-team-portal/+bug/605651
I'm familiar with this ticket. I'm not sure how it relates with a
currently established process of
st been Canonical who uses
"approval" as a mechanism for giving gifts, Prentice Hall used it as
the criteria for who they would send copies of the Official Ubuntu
Book to:
http://www.jonobacon.org/2011/07/05/free-official-ubuntu-book-for-approved-loco-teams/
--
Elizabeth Krumbach // Ly
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Craig Maloney wrote:
> * Martin Owens (docto...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 18:49 +, Laura Czajkowski wrote:
>> > some teams prefer to use their own tools.
>>
>> A fair point. But I'm thinking more about automation and instant
>> feedback. Not co
* Chris Johnston (chrisjohns...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Craig,
>
> At one point there was work being done on a team reporting system [1].
> Please feel free to pick it up and start developing on it. I suspect
> though that you may not want it completely integrated in LTP as I
> think other groups/tea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/08/2013 02:25 PM, Craig Maloney wrote:
> * Martin Owens (docto...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 18:49 +, Laura Czajkowski wrote:
>>> some teams prefer to use their own tools.
>>
>> A fair point. But I'm thinking more about autom
* Martin Owens (docto...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 18:49 +, Laura Czajkowski wrote:
> > some teams prefer to use their own tools.
>
> A fair point. But I'm thinking more about automation and instant
> feedback. Not council meditation. I'm sure the council would make a lot
> mor
oteams which are active and get approved by
>>>> the LoCo council will end up in the sponsored list and yet to be
>>>> approved teams fall in a not so active category?.
>>> Oh no, no, active would simply be 'has the group edited anything on
>>> loco-
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 18:49 +, Laura Czajkowski wrote:
> some teams prefer to use their own tools.
A fair point. But I'm thinking more about automation and instant
feedback. Not council meditation. I'm sure the council would make a lot
more detailed and accurate reporting, but that's not to sa
On 08/02/13 18:06, Martin Owens wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 19:43 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>> But wont it be too harsh on other loco teams as it gives rise to a
>> thinking that they are marked as inactive just because they might have
>> forgotten/dint have time to
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 19:43 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> But wont it be too harsh on other loco teams as it gives rise to a
> thinking that they are marked as inactive just because they might have
> forgotten/dint have time to update their wiki or portal page for some
> time whils
gt;
> My preference is for "Canonical Supported" and "Active". Activity can be
> automatically seen from the loco teams website and Canonical's support
> can be dished our with whatever metrics they'd like.
>
Doesn't "Canonical Supported"
es members of
> the community.
>
Hello Zied,
Agreed that Canonical does provide some resources (such as shipping
cd's/dvd's via shipit for example) for Approved teams but I believe
all the decisions are made till date on the LoCo teams approval by the
Ubuntu LoCo Council on behalf of t
l in a not so active category?.
>
> Oh no, no, active would simply be 'has the group edited anything on
> loco-teams in the past 6 months'. It's more of an extreme way to
> discount truly inactive, abandoned groups and maybe find a way to get
> new people involved.
Fri, 2013-02-08 at 08:27 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>> > something like those locoteams which are active and get approved by
>> > the LoCo council will end up in the sponsored list and yet to be
>> > approved teams fall in a not so active category?.
>>
>&
y?.
>
> Oh no, no, active would simply be 'has the group edited anything on
> loco-teams in the past 6 months'. It's more of an extreme way to
> discount truly inactive, abandoned groups and maybe find a way to get
> new people involved.
>
> Martin,
>
>
&
'has the group edited anything on
loco-teams in the past 6 months'. It's more of an extreme way to
discount truly inactive, abandoned groups and maybe find a way to get
new people involved.
Martin,
--
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.c
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Martin Owens wrote:
>
> My preference is for "Canonical Supported" and "Active". Activity can be
> automatically seen from the loco teams website and Canonical's support
> can be dished our with whatever metrics they'd li
r people at
> > times. The feedback is that the word approved loco is not great to motivate
> > others who have not been approved or at some point were approved and then
> > not approved.
My preference is for "Canonical Supported" and "Active". Activity can be
a
Hi all!
I think "sponsored" or "verified" are the best words for our Loco Teams
Sergio Meneses
Linux User: #478743
Ubuntu User: #24056
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Randall Ross wrote:
> On 13-02-06 11:47 PM, YoBoY wrote:
> > Le 06/02/2013 20
On 13-02-06 11:47 PM, YoBoY wrote:
> Le 06/02/2013 20:23, Laura Czajkowski a écrit :
>>
>> status = Verified, Evaluated, Reviewed, Sponsored
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> It's great to see a change on this "approved" status (who just give us
> some CDs and gifts sometimes). I really like the idea. If I have to
>
eg dvd's/cd's et al))
On the contrary verified also is good but it should not raise a point
in any of the locoteams as to LoCo council does not look at the
operations of unverified loco teams (which isn't btw) and should not
refrain anyone from reaching out to the LoCo council in case
i-annual review, in which case feel free to let me know.
>
>
I'm not sure why you thought it was Canonical's motives for the
reapproval, it's not it came from the community discussions that it was
a good idea as a health check to see how loco teams were doing, it's
also part
Le 06/02/2013 20:23, Laura Czajkowski a écrit :
status = Verified, Evaluated, Reviewed, Sponsored
Hi,
It's great to see a change on this "approved" status (who just give us
some CDs and gifts sometimes). I really like the idea. If I have to
choose one of the proposition, I'll go with the R
1 - 100 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
