I agree with the phrase "Sponsored" while at the same time I think YoBoy has pointed out a seemingly important issue.
Which is sponsorship is nice albeit its not a reward or recognition the reality is that LoCo's do a lot of hard work marketing Ubuntu to get this label of recognition just so they can get CD's (never enough) to further their marketing to a higher level. I sometimes think the process and criteria used to judge who gets resources is counterproductive indeed we have a number of states when love Ubuntu but do not want to go through hoopla just to get DVD's which then they have to distribute. +1 for being the Ubuntu Community and not the sponsored Canonical Community. My two cents written at 2:00am ;) On Feb 9, 2013 12:37 AM, "YoBoY" <yoboy.legu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Le 09/02/2013 01:20, Grant Bowman a écrit : > >> +1 for "Sponsored" which seems to have a majority from my unscientific >> view reading along. >> > > Really? Another fork of the topic? > > The "sponsored" term just make me smile, and it's so linked with the commercial part of Canonical. We are not really sponsored, giving us some CD twice a year, it's good, but it's clearly not enough. Where are all the common communication stuff (stickers, badges,…)? Locos are alone for that and have to find real sponsorship elsewhere. > > So please, don't link us too much with Canonical. We are the Ubuntu Community, not the sponsored Canonical Community. > > Big hugs, > > YoBoY > > > > -- > loco-contacts mailing list > loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
-- loco-contacts mailing list loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
