On 13-02-09 08:29 AM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote: > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Neil Oosthuizen <nlst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> In the sense that the current approved loco's would be known as "recognized" >> loco's... as in "recognized" by Canonical (or the Ubuntu Community) for >> sustained contributions as a loco. But like I said, not to fragment the >> discussion anymore, just something that occurred to me. >> > Thanks Niel for your response. Its perfectly fine I think as the > community and the LoCo council would welcome inputs from all. > > So, Dont you think it would be a bit hard if we say that a loco team > is unrecognised when a loco team has just started to contribute, > organising events and spreading ubuntu with a goal of getting approved > eventually find the word a bit demotivating? > > Regards, > The word "recognized" can also be an emotionally charged word to some. It is similar (though softer) in tone to "approved."
Though "sponsored" has a current majority, perhaps we can reach consensus with a bit more information: What problem are we (or were we) trying to solve by labeling teams in the first place? Can anyone provide a crisp problem statement? And, as a thought experiment, what would the LoCo landscape look like if labels were dropped altogether? Would it catalyze the creation of more teams? More active teams? Cheers, Randall
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- loco-contacts mailing list loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
