On 01.07.2009, at 01:53, Patrick McCarty wrote:
Here is what I'm confused about:
If lilypond-book requires md5, and 10.4 has Python 2.3.5, then why
hasn't this been reported by Mac users before?
-Patrick
Because I forgot. This was reported on the german lilypond forum, and
I forgot to add
Now that the grob-properties are mostly sorted, the back-to-back
'direction entries for TextScript seem rather odd:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond-internals/TextScript.html
Can anyone verify unequivocally that the second 'direction entry
for TextScript in define-grobs.
> I'm not top-posting
Hello,
I was typesetting a bit of polyphonic music and wanted \voiceOne to put dynamics
above the staff. Looking at the code I realized that \voiceOne, \voiceTwo, etc.
automatically change the directions of the grobs in the hardcoded list
direction-polyphonic-grobs in the fi
Mark Polesky wrote:
Mark Polesky wrote:
Okay, I think I got somewhere, but now jEdit won't open on my
host drive. I don't know if it's related, but installing
VirtualBox/lilybuntu is the only thing that really changed since
I could last open jEdit...
I tried troubleshooting jEdit according to
Mark Polesky wrote:
> Okay, I think I got somewhere, but now jEdit won't open on my
> host drive. I don't know if it's related, but installing
> VirtualBox/lilybuntu is the only thing that really changed since
> I could last open jEdit...
>
> I tried troubleshooting jEdit according to their FAQ,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 04:53:44PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> If lilypond-book requires md5, and 10.4 has Python 2.3.5, then why
> hasn't this been reported by Mac users before?
Because mac users got used to manually installing python from
macports or fink, manually editing the #!/usr/bin/pyt
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> You use the lilybuntu.iso file to install the lily-dev ready
> Ubuntu.
Okay, I think I got somewhere, but now jEdit won't open on my
host drive. I don't know if it's related, but installing
VirtualBox/lilybuntu is the only thing that really changed since
I could last open
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 01:43:14AM +0200, James E. Bailey wrote:
>
> On 01.07.2009, at 01:05, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Graham
>> Percival wrote:
>>>
>>> No 2.5 on 10.4, and no md5 in python 2.3.5. Can we include md5 in
>>> the embedded python 2.6 inside the lily
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote:
Hello LilyPond developers!
Some improvements to the Mac GUI have been integrated into GUB. You
can find the list of changes here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/88076/show
Graham and I would a
On 01.07.2009, at 01:05, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:33:29PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:05 PM, James E.
Bailey wrote:
10.4.11 Intel. GUI and convert-ly work.
Hmm. You should have a
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:33:29PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:05 PM, James E.
>> Bailey wrote:
>> >
>> > 10.4.11 Intel. GUI and convert-ly work.
>>
>> Hmm. You should have a couple of files in your installati
2009/6/29 Graham Percival :
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:41:22PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
>> Can you make me a project member on the bug tracker? It will save
>> time and hassle if I can do the tagging myself once I've ported each
>> bugfix.
>
> Certainly! That should been done ages ago.
Thank
Thanks, applied to kainhofer. Jan: I'll send you the whole bunch
of patches at once.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:04:05PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch should fix the "/usr/bin/python" problem for the Mac OS X
> Python scripts; "/usr/bin/env python" is use
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:33:29PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:05 PM, James E.
> Bailey wrote:
> >
> > 10.4.11 Intel. GUI and convert-ly work.
>
> Hmm. You should have a couple of files in your installation:
> "md5.pyc" and "md5.pyo".
>
> On this machine (10.5.6), t
2009/6/29 Mark Polesky :
> 1) Did I make any mistakes?
These are so deprecated, they don't exist (you've picked them up from
the Changelog):
ly:paper-def?
ly:verbose?
> 3) when you write this:
> > None here, as long as you automate it (perhaps use a markup
> > command to extract and prettif
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:05 PM, James E.
Bailey wrote:
>
> 10.4.11 Intel. GUI and convert-ly work.
> lilypond-book fails because of python. Also, updating lilypond-book with
> either #!/path/to/python or #!/usr/bin/env python gives me this error:
> 23:59:46 jamesebailey lilypond
> snippets:~/Downl
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>
>> Hello LilyPond developers!
>>
>> Some improvements to the Mac GUI have been integrated into GUB. You
>> can find the list of changes here:
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/88076/show
>>
>> Graham and I would ap
2009/7/1 Carl D. Sorensen :
> You install the operating system that is on the .iso you downloaded.
>
> Being on a windows machine, you may need to burn a cd from the .iso, then
> install from the cd.
In a virtual machine, the CD drive is also virtual, an ISO image works
as if a real CD were insert
On 6/30/09 1:30 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
>
>
> regarding this...
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-06/msg00294.html
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-06/msg00303.html
>
> Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> After making the .iso I tested it in Sun VirtualBox
On 30.06.2009, at 21:48, Patrick McCarty wrote:
Hello LilyPond developers!
Some improvements to the Mac GUI have been integrated into GUB. You
can find the list of changes here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/88076/show
Graham and I would appreciate any feedback on functionality from those
r
Hello,
This patch should fix the "/usr/bin/python" problem for the Mac OS X
Python scripts; "/usr/bin/env python" is used instead.
The discussion is here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=717
Thanks,
Patrick
>From 8ea2f88fc7041f4d81c51f9936dd162b21ed31fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200
On Jun 30, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
Hello LilyPond developers!
Some improvements to the Mac GUI have been integrated into GUB. You
can find the list of changes here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/88076/show
Graham and I would appreciate any feedback on functionality from tho
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote:
Hello LilyPond developers!
Some improvements to the Mac GUI have been integrated into GUB. You
can find the list of changes here:
I tried it on a PPC running 10.4.11. Files compile fine from the gui or
the command line. Updating syntax from the
Patrick McCarty wrote:
Hello LilyPond developers!
Some improvements to the Mac GUI have been integrated into GUB. You
can find the list of changes here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/88076/show
Graham and I would appreciate any feedback on functionality from those
running Mac OS X 10.3, 10.4,
Hello LilyPond developers!
Some improvements to the Mac GUI have been integrated into GUB. You
can find the list of changes here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/88076/show
Graham and I would appreciate any feedback on functionality from those
running Mac OS X 10.3, 10.4, or 10.5. The test insta
Mark Polesky wrote:
regarding this...
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-06/msg00294.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-06/msg00303.html
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
After making the .iso I tested it in Sun VirtualBox OSE and
everything worked perfectly. Here
regarding this...
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-06/msg00294.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-06/msg00303.html
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> After making the .iso I tested it in Sun VirtualBox OSE and
> everything worked perfectly. Here are the exact step
On 6/30/09 12:16 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:53:34AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 6/30/09 11:02 AM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
>>
>> However, on a hunch I decided to look at the .gdbinit file. I had been
>> using the .gdbinit file from the CG. When I
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:53:34AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 6/30/09 11:02 AM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> >
> > When I compile LilyPond with the intent of debugging it, I use
> >
> > ./configure --disable-optimising
> >
> > instead. Did you try that?
>
> I had not. I also hadn't
On 6/30/09 11:02 AM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 08:40:05AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> I'm trying to get the CG instructions for using gdb up-to-date. And I'm
>> trying to debug a problem with the new autobeam stuff I'm working on.
>>
>> So I checked out a fresh
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 08:40:05AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> I'm trying to get the CG instructions for using gdb up-to-date. And I'm
> trying to debug a problem with the new autobeam stuff I'm working on.
>
> So I checked out a fresh master.
>
> Then I did
>
> ./configure --enable-debugg
>> Thanks, these are both fixed now. I've configured PianoStaff to
>> stretch by default, but by a smaller amount than the other staff
>> groups. At this point, though, all of the default settings are
>> provisional (ie. if someone would try out different values and
>> choose something that looks
> Any thoughts on how to debug this segmentation fault in gdb?
You might try to run valgrind on lilypond, ignoring the zillions of
warnings regarding Scheme (or use a valgrind suppress file -- a few
years ago Han-Wen has posted something): This should give you the `hot
spot' which causes the segf
2009/6/30 Joe Neeman :
> Thanks, these are both fixed now. I've configured PianoStaff to stretch
> by default, but by a smaller amount than the other staff groups. At this
> point, though, all of the default settings are provisional (ie. if
> someone would try out different values and choose someth
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:48 +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Montag, 22. Juni 2009 15:31:14 schrieb Joe Neeman:
> > A quick update on the new vertical spacing: the version now in dev/jneeman
> > has most of the features that I had planned
>
> Wow, I just tried it out for the first time, and
I'm trying to get the CG instructions for using gdb up-to-date. And I'm
trying to debug a problem with the new autobeam stuff I'm working on.
So I checked out a fresh master.
Then I did
./configure --enable-debugging
make
gdb lilypond
GNU gdb 6.3.50-20050815 (Apple version gdb-768) (Tue Oct
Thanks for your patience.
It was a pleasure to help. (but wasn't easy for me).
--- Mar 30/6/09, Graham Percival ha scritto:
Da: Graham Percival
Oggetto: Re: espanol.ly minimal additions
A: "Massimiliano G. G."
Data: Martedì 30 giugno 2009, 08:09
Thanks, both patches applied.
Cheers,
- Gra
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> So, instead, we can say that, *if* anyone should complain
>
> - users are greatly helped by/need clear image logos
> - every single project has it's own unreadable legalese
> and we cannot afford the time and money to get a lawyer
> go over this
> - it str
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:56:57AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op dinsdag 30-06-2009 om 01:42 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
> > Since my contributions are directly proportional to my amount of
> > panty-knottedness, shouldn't you deliberately knot them? ;)
> > (seriousl
Op dinsdag 30-06-2009 om 01:42 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Since my contributions are directly proportional to my amount of
> panty-knottedness, shouldn't you deliberately knot them? ;)
> (seriously, "immense irritation" is the most motivating factor for
> me working on lilyp
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:30:29AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> So, instead, we can say that, *if* anyone should complain
>
> - it strikes us that these legalese are in place to prevent
> misuse/slander etc, and *not* to slow down other free software
> projects, or hinder other free
Op dinsdag 30-06-2009 om 00:59 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> > > Why dont you just leave them, and remove them if someone sends a
> > > nastygram?
> >
> > +1.
>
> Because if anybody complains, it's kind-of hard to pretend it was
> an innocent mistake after this archived, publ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 06:12:33 schrieb Graham Percival:
> Hi Reinhold,
>
> You recently committed d41b484a83c68e0f12800c3f073eb991af1e7946,
> which (apparently) stopped some breakage with the latext texi2html
> version.
>
> Is that for 1.82, or fo
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:15:00AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op maandag 29-06-2009 om 22:55 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Han-Wen
> Nienhuys:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Francisco Vila
> > wrote:
> > > 2009/6/29 Graham Percival :
> > >> IMO, this whole thing is bloody bollocks. L
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 05:13:26PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Windows logos are not free and they are problematic. These are in
> commons and can be used:
>
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Microsoft_Windows_logos
Heh, I like the imitation logo.
Could you take a screenshot of a b
> Alternatively, a new .scm file (similar to define-grobs.scm or
> define-grob-interfaces.scm) could be created: define-predicates.scm.
> This would define an alist of predicate types and predicates, and
> any predicates that were found by your routine and were not included
> in the define-predicat
Op maandag 29-06-2009 om 22:55 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Han-Wen
Nienhuys:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> > 2009/6/29 Graham Percival :
> >> IMO, this whole thing is bloody bollocks. Let's stop wasting our
> >> time and simply remove every graphical logo from the we
47 matches
Mail list logo
