On 6/30/09 12:16 PM, "Patrick McCarty" <pnor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:53:34AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 6/30/09 11:02 AM, "Patrick McCarty" <pnor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> However, on a hunch I decided to look at the .gdbinit file. I had been
>> using the .gdbinit file from the CG. When I eliminated the .gdbinit file,
>> everything ran properly. So apparently, it's a problem with the .gdbinit
>> file.
>>
>> Could somebody with more knowledge of what's going on than me look at the
>> .gdbinit file and tell me what's wrong?
>
> I'm not sure, but here is the output for me when I use the .gdbinit
> file:
>
> $ gdb lilypond
> GNU gdb 6.8
> Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
> <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
> and "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"...
> Function "scm_error" not defined.
> Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) [answered
> N; input not from terminal]
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x6e447d: file warn.cc, line 68.
> Breakpoint 2 at 0x4f7e9e: file grob.cc, line 562.
>
> As you can see, gdb does not create a breakpoint for "scm_error",
> which is a part of Guile.
>
> I would try removing the breakpoint for "scm_error" in the init file
> to see if that works, and keep everything else.
Interesting ... I got a breakpoint set when I ran gdb. So my output was
different from yours.
But I eliminated the scm_error breakpoint from the file, and things ran OK.
Then, I manually added a breakpoint for scm_error, and I got a different
address for the breakpoint, but things seem to work normally.
Thanks for the tip!
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
