2009/6/29 Mark Polesky <markpole...@yahoo.com>: > 1) Did I make any mistakes?
These are so deprecated, they don't exist (you've picked them up from the Changelog): ly:paper-def? ly:verbose? > 3) when you write this: > > None here, as long as you automate it (perhaps use a markup > > command to extract and prettify the list entries). > what qualifies as automating?Can I just copy the UNARY > TYPE-CHECKS to a list and work with that? Is that what you > meant? Or did you want the UNARY TYPE-CHECKS list to somehow > be automated, to account for future additions to the list? > Offhand, I can't imagine a sensible way of doing that. If you add the missing predicates to type-p-name-alist, then you can use it to display a list of names and descriptions. You could add a public function to c++.scm which will read type-p-name-alist and return a list of string pairs (predicate-name . description). Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
