While we all appreciate you inviting the community to help, I also
encourage the proposers to consider choosing a name among yourselves.
There's nothing wrong with that, and as it's the project you are
proposing, it's natural that you can choose the name.
geir
Jim Hurley wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> I
There certainly is interest in Apache Harmony, as this is very much
aligned to what we've already been doing for the past year and a few
months.
geir
On Sep 27, 2006, at 5:09 AM, Chris Gray wrote:
Hello guys,
To introduce myself: I'm one of the original developers of the
Wonka embedded
All,
The PPMC of the Apache Harmony incubator podling has voted to ask for
graduation from the Apache Incubator. We have enjoyed our time here
with you, but feel that we don't want to overstay our welcome. We want
to do our part to help make sure the ASF has more projects than the
Incubator :)
+1
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> The Tuscany PPMC has voted to release a parent pom and buildtools jar
> that are dependencies for a forthcoming M2 release. These would be made
> available through the m2-incubating-repository to allow end users to
> build source distributions of that release. In accordan
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 October 2006 12:44, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> Thanks, and we look forward to your comments. To avoid cross-post
>> confusion, I will forward this message to the harmony-dev list rather
>> than CC.
>
> Amazing feat, indeed. I
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Tuesday October 17 2006 12:44 am, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> The PPMC of the Apache Harmony incubator podling has voted to ask for
>> graduation from the Apache Incubator. We have enjoyed our time here
>> with you, but feel that we don't wa
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>> On Tuesday October 17 2006 12:44 am, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>>> The PPMC of the Apache Harmony incubator podling has voted to ask for
>>>> grad
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 October 2006 10:33, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> Will you be satisfied with a vote on posting a snapshot?
>
> I think some Incubator PMC member wants to see a 'full release' artifact for
> review. The podling should select a r
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Don Brown wrote:
Agreed. I don't think it is fair to be making up graduation
requirements right when a project is about to graduate.
The graduation requirement is that a majority of the PMC members
agree that a podling should be graduate
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/18/06, Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You said that you have run Tomcat on top of Harmony. Why can't you
produce a release such that I can throw the Tomcat jar at it, too?
Sure, it is a developer release, but it let's non-Harmony folks play
with your p
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 10/18/06, Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You said that you have run Tomcat on top of Harmony. Why can't you
>> produce a r
(I had a modified version of this yesterday, as I wanted to wait to
summarize. Here it is, trimmed down)
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:44:22PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
The PPMC of the Apache Harmony incubator podling has voted to ask for
graduation from the Apache
I'm not dismissing the importance of Greg's concern, and am not trying
to take the Harmony conversation down a rat-hole (or different rat-hole
in this case...), so I changed the Subject line.
---
Let me take a brief side trip here about [Unwritten] Incubator
Graduation Requirements
Isn'
I made the mistake of not responding publicly, thinking that it was just
best to ignore it. I had nothing to do with it - it didn't represent any
sentiment that I have, nor was I a participant in any such email
conversation, or ever have been. My head has only room for one hat at a
time, and
geir
Leo Simons wrote:
Last e-mail on this for the day, promised! :-)
Greg -- having many e-mails as threaded responses rather than a single
one is useful if you have nested threading and you're only interested in
part of a sub-sub-thread. Maybe gmail needs fixing :-P. In any case,
here&
Into the incubator, of course ;)
geir
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Robert,
Is this something you would bring over to the ASF, and which we can start
promoting around the ASF to use?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the source is the heart of any apache release. most issues with
> releases are actually issues with the source. a community that does
> not understand how to create source that can be
Greg Stein wrote:
On 10/19/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 19, 2006, at 3:32 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
...
> I'd like to ask that those who have asked for a release to assuage
> concerns about community health and capability to please read those
&g
I'm pretty resigned to the fact that we're not going to be able to
present a resolution to the board this month for Harmony. I do keep a
flicker of hope, mainly because I'm an eternal optimist.
I do think it's a shame, because I believe the core values sought and
taught in the incubation pr
I just wanted to run RAT on RAT ;)
geir
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 10/19/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this something you would bring over to the ASF, and which we can start
promoting around the ASF to use?
To be honest, I don't believe it's a good fit. Not every projec
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
IMHO - the only reason to have a project (TLP or subproject, no matter) is
to release code. Anything prior to a release might be a sandbox, it might
be a podling, it might be a lose alliance of the willing. Whatever...
Greg Stein wrote:
I was happy to give a +1 days ago. But that wasn't put on the table.
Ok. I'm going to stick my neck out here, out of my comfort zone.
While bringing Harmony out for graduation was never meant to be a
vehicle for change, it's clear that there are opportunities where we can
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Last checkpoint, "Has the sponsoring PMC [e.g. Board] voted to accept the
project?" You have a few hours yet to put a resolution on their plate for
next week. And honestly - they would probably table it for review even if
you gave them a month lead time, so might
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
I was happy to give a +1 days ago. But that wasn't put on the table.
Ok. I'm going to stick my neck out here, out of my comfort zone.
While bringing Harmony out for graduation was never meant to be a
vehicle for change, it's c
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 06:34:02PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Just so no one misunderstands this - the only way a podling can graduate
is if it has enough IPMC votes. The model in mind was that there are
IPMC members engaged with the community, so that it's
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not trying hold a vote "elsewhere" - this can only happen if there
is a binding vote by the Incubator - it just means you vote "over there"
rather than "over here&
Might be nice to leave "binding-ness" as an accounting detail for the
person running the vote, to get rid of the "my vote counts, yours
doesn't" thing that David pointed out.
After all, if you get consensus, and it's all +1s.
geir
Paul Fremantle wrote:
David
I think you are wrong. Bef
Greg Stein wrote:
The Incubator is about verification, not participation. I think Geir
is wrong in trying to lever IPMC members into more project
involvement. We are here as volunteers to oversee the process, not
participate in the projects.
I think this is a topic for honest disagreement,
The Apache Harmony community has voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
<http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/
200610.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The following votes have been recorded (in order of votes cast) :
+1 Geir Magnus
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The Apache Harmony community has voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
<http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/
200610.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The following votes have been recorded (in order of vote
w00t!
Jim Hurley wrote:
Hi all-
Thank you to the 134 folks who participated in the survey
to help us determine a new name for the "Jini" project
proposal at Apache. The results are included below.
The first preference was for "aladin" (related to the "genie"
theme), but unfortunately, there ar
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, I am asking for a vote of the Incubator on graduation of Harmony
that is conditional on the board's approval of a TLP for that purpose.
This way we don't have to vote again after the board meet
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, I am asking for a vote of the Incubator on graduation of Harmony
that is conditional on the board's approval of a TLP for that purpose.
This way we don't have to
As noted in the vote email :
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Under the Incubator process, Harmony must have a destination prior
to exiting incubation, which means the ASF Board must decide whether or
not create a TLP for Apache Harmony prior to the Incubator vote being
official. However, I suspect
I didn't want to mess up the vote thread...
Should this really be "Shall"? We've been successful in Harmony with a
slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt' start with any code.
We treated the Initial Committer l
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Should this really be "Shall"? We've been successful in Harmony with a
slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt' start with any
code.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Should this really be "Shall"? We've been successful in Harmony with a
slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
except for the mentors and champi
Anyway, I do realize that the discussion was two weeks ago. I just
missed it. Apologies. Ignore me :)
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Should this really be "Shall"?
Anyone else? Mino started processing last night, and I want to give
time for people to have a chance to vote...
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The Apache Harmony community has voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
<http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incuba
if you haven't voted and are interested in voting, please do.
Thanks
geir
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(transaction);
getBoardApproval(transaction);
transaction.commit();
}
catch(RollbackException re) {
continueIncubation();
}
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The Apache Harmony community has voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
<http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incuba
+1
Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
The OpenJPA incubator community voted on and has approved a proposal to
release OpenJPA 0.9.6-incubating. Pursuant to the Releases section of
the Incubation Policy
(http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
) we would now like to req
I don't think so.
Let the podling come up with what they call 0.9.6, let it give clear
information to what that means, and the incubator PMC votes from there.
This is getting counterproductive.
geir
Patrick Linskey wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Marc that we should continue to iterate on the
0.
+1
Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
The OpenJPA incubator community voted on and has approved a proposal to
release OpenJPA 0.9.6-incubating. Pursuant to the Releases section of
the Incubation Policy
(http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
) we would now like to req
+1
Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
Hi,
I have fixed all the issues that were raised during the earlier vote and
I have uploaded the new release at: http://people.apache.org/~bravi
Also, I used the tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko/tags/yoko-1.0-incubating
-M1-release for th
me: River
* Project Key: RIVER
(4) identify the initial set of committers
* Dan Creswell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Bill Venners ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Mark Brouwer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Geir Magnusson Jr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Bob Scheifler ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Jim Waldo ([EMAIL
+1 from me
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as "River".
You may be familiar with this project as it has been discussed under
other names, including Braintree and J
Note - this vote will be for 3 days, ending midnight, saturday december
23rd, 2006.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as "River".
You may be familiar with this project
On Dec 21, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 20, 2006, at 10:46 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as
"River". You may be familiar with this project
On Dec 21, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 21, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Dec 21, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 20, 2006, at 10:46 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Jim,
I've updated the proposal in the wiki, hopefully addressing your two
concerns - noting that there are no other implementations of Jini
technology at the ASF, and noting that committership for the initial
committers will be granted upon engagement with the project, as
determined by th
Yoav
No other votes cast. (I hope I didn't miss anyone).
As we received an adequate number of +1 votes from Incubator PMC
members, this vote passes :)
I'll get the necessary infrastructure machinery going, staring with
the mail lists.
geir
On Dec 20, 2006, at 10:46 PM, Geir Ma
All - note that the mail lists for the River podling have been created :
The public lists are :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subscribe in the usual way, following the pattern :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
See you there.
geir
--
As long as you mark it as UNTESTED or BETA per the JAX-WS part - IOW,
make no claim about compatibility, you're fine.
geir
On Mar 13, 2007, at 4:14 AM, Bozhong Lin wrote:
Hi,
Apache CXF team is planning for its 2.0 final release. In benefit
of CXF users, we would like to cut 2.0 release s
401 - 454 of 454 matches
Mail list logo
